Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Deltoid muscle weakness due to C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery is an uncommon but potentially debilitating complication. Symptoms can manifest upon emergence from anesthesia or days to weeks following surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of spontaneous electromyography (spEMG) monitoring in detecting evolving C-5 nerve root compromise. By contrast, transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potential (tceMEP) monitoring has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in identifying impending C-5 injury. In this study the authors sought to 1) determine the frequency of immediate versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery, 2) identify risk factors associated with the development of C-5 palsies, and 3) determine whether tceMEP and spEMG neuromonitoring can help to identify acutely evolving C-5 injury as well as predict delayed-onset deltoid muscle paresis.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed the neuromonitoring and surgical records of all patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery involving the C-4 and/or C-5 level in the period from 2006 to 2008. Real-time tceMEP and spEMG monitoring from the deltoid muscle was performed as part of a multimodal neuromonitoring protocol during all surgeries. Charts were reviewed to identify patients who had experienced significant changes in tceMEPs and/or episodes of neurotonic spEMG activity during surgery, as well as those who had shown new-onset deltoid weakness either immediately upon emergence from the anesthesia or in a delayed fashion.

Results

Two hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing 235 cervical spine surgeries involving the C4–5 level served as the study cohort. The overall incidence of perioperative C-5 nerve root injury was 5.1%. The incidence was greatest (50%) in cases with dual corpectomies at the C-4 and C-5 spinal levels. All patients who emerged from anesthesia with deltoid weakness had significant and unresolved changes in tceMEPs during surgery, whereas only 1 had remarkable spEMG activity. Sensitivity and specificity of tceMEP monitoring for identifying acute-onset deltoid weakness were 100% and 99%, respectively. By contrast, sensitivity and specificity for spEMG were only 20% and 92%, respectively. Neither modality was effective in identifying patients who demonstrated delayed-onset deltoid weakness.

Conclusions

The risk of new-onset deltoid muscle weakness following cervical spine surgery is greatest for patients undergoing 2-level corpectomies involving C-4 and C-5. Transcranial electrical stimulation–induced MEP monitoring is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting C-5 radiculopathy that manifests immediately upon waking from anesthesia. While the absence of sustained spEMG activity does not rule out nerve root irritation, the presence of excessive neurotonic discharges serves both to alert the surgeon of such potentially injurious events and to prompt neuromonitoring personnel about the need for additional tceMEP testing. Delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury cannot be predicted by intraoperative neuromonitoring via either modality.

Abbreviations used in this paper:ACD = anterior cervical decompression; EMG = electromyography; spEMG = spontaneous EMG; SSEP = somatosensory evoked potential; tceMEP = transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potential.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Vidya M. Bhalodia, M.A., 900 Old Marple Rd., Springfield, PA 19064. email: vidya.bhalodia@specialtycaresg.com.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online July 26, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12355.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Transcranial electrical stimulation–induced MEPs recorded from deltoid, biceps, and first dorsal interosseous muscles during C4–5 corpectomy. Responses from the deltoid and biceps muscles showed > 65% amplitude attenuation during the course of decompression, prompting a surgical alert. There was complete resolution of attenuated responses following a 15-minute surgical pause. The patient had no neurological sequelae upon emergence from the anesthesia.

References

1

Bose BSestokas AKSchwartz DM: Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 6:3813852007

2

Bose BSestokas AKSchwartz DM: Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during instrumented anterior cervical fusion. Spine J 4:2022072004

3

Chen YGuo YLu XChen DSong DShi J: Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:24302011

4

Dai LNi BYuan WJia L: Radiculopathy after laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:8468491998

5

Fan DSchwartz DMVaccaro ARHilibrand ASAlbert TJ: Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:249925022002

6

Flynn TB: Neurologic complications of anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7:5365391982

7

Greiner-Perth RElsaghir HBöhm HEl-Meshtawy M: The incidence of C5-C6 radiculopathy as a complication of extensive cervical decompression: own results and review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 28:1371422005

8

Hasegawa KHomma TChiba Y: Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E197E2022007

9

Hashimoto MMochizuki MAiba AOkawa AHayashi KSakuma T: C5 palsy following anterior decompression and spinal fusion for cervical degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 19:170217102010

10

Hilibrand ASSchwartz DMSethuraman VVaccaro ARAlbert TJ: Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:124812532004

11

Ikenaga MShikata JTanaka C: Radiculopathy of C-5 after anterior decompression for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 3:2102172005

12

Jimenez JCSani SBraverman BDeutsch HRatliff JK: Palsies of the fifth cervical nerve root after cervical decompression: prevention using continuous intraoperative electromyography monitoring. J Neurosurg Spine 3:92972005

13

Kelleher MOTan GSarjeant RFehlings MG: Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8:2152212008

14

Kristof RAKiefer TThudium MRingel FStoffel MKovacs A: Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate-screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod-screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 18:195119562009

15

Lieberman JALyon RFeiner JHu SSBerven SH: The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E414E4242008

16

Liu TZou WHan YWang Y: Correlative study of nerve root palsy and cervical posterior decompression laminectomy and internal fixation. Orthopedics 33:5582010

17

MacDonald DB: Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:4164292002

18

Sakaura HHosono NMukai YIshii TYoshikawa H: C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:244724512003

19

Sasai KSaito TAkagi SKato IOhnari HIida H: Preventing C5 palsy after laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:197219772003

20

Schwartz DMAuerbach JDDormans JPFlynn JDrummond DSBowe JA: Neurophysiologic detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:244024492007

21

Schwartz DMSestokas AK: A systems-based algorithmic approach to intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery. Semin Spine Surg 14:1361452002

22

Schwartz DMSestokas AKDormans JPVaccaro ARHilibrand ASFlynn JM: Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: is it safe?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:104610492011

23

Schwartz DMSestokas AKHilibrand ASVaccaro ARBose BLi M: Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 20:4374442006

24

Sevki KMehmet TUfuk TAzmi HMercan SErkal B: Results of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior cervical corpectomy and stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:249325002004

25

Shibuya SKomatsubara SOka SKanda YArima NYamamoto T: Differences between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spinal Cord 48:2142202010

26

Tanaka NNakanishi KFujiwara YKamei NOchi M: Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:301330172006

27

Yonenobu KHosono NIwasaki MAsano MOno K: Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:127712821991

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 54 54 11
Full Text Views 64 64 27
PDF Downloads 105 105 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar