This study compared the fixing strength and stability achieved by a unilateral plate and screw configuration against a standard cervical fixation plate using a single-level corpectomy and allograft strut graft model.
Multidirectional in vitro flexibility tests were performed using a robotic spine testing system. Human cadaveric spines were assessed for spinal stability after vertebral corpectomy and anterior instrumentation. Specimens were mounted cranially and caudally on custom jigs that were then attached to load cells on the robotic system's end effector and base pedestal. C2–T1 spine specimens (n = 6) were tested intact; then after C-5 corpectomy (the vertebral body was excised), allograft placement and anterior plate fixation were performed. The surgeons performed a uniform corpectomy and reconstruction of each specimen in a protocol fashion. Two plates were compared: a unilateral 4-hole cervical plate designed to obtain rigid fixation using 4 convergent fixation screws all placed unilateral to the vertebral midline, and a standard cervical plate with bilateral plate screw configuration. The plate testing sequence was selected at random to limit bias. Fixation screws were matched for length and diameter. Pure moments were applied under load control (maximum 1.8 Nm) in flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation. Vertebral motion was measured using an optoelectronic system. The mean relative range of motion between C-4 and C-6 was compared among groups using repeated-measures ANOVA (significance level of 0.05).
In comparing the intact construct and 2 different plates in all planes of motion, only motion in extension (intact vs unilateral plate, p = 0.003; intact vs standard plate, p = 0.001) and left axial rotation (intact vs unilateral plate, p = 0.019) were significantly affected. In terms of immediate cervical stability after 1-level corpectomy and placement of an allograft reconstruction, the unilateral plate showed comparable stiffness to the standard plate in all 3 motion planes (flexion [p = 0.993], extension [p = 0.732], left lateral bending [p = 0.683], right lateral bending [p = 0.546], left axial rotation [p = 0.082], and right axial rotation [p = 0.489]). The unilateral plate showed a trend toward improved stiffness in axial rotation. In no direction did the unilateral configuration prove significantly less stiff than the traditional configuration.
The unilateral plate design proposed here requires minimal dissection and retraction beyond the midline of tissues susceptible to scar, postoperative pain, and swelling. The authors' study suggests that a unilateral plate can be configured to provide comparable fixation strength and torsional stiffness compared with traditional, widely accepted plate designs.
Abbreviation used in this paper:ROM = range of motion.
Address correspondence to: Robert F. McLain, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk S40, Cleveland, Ohio 44195. email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online April 19, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.SPINE12949.
Frempong-BoaduAHoutenJKOsbornBOpulenciaJKellsLGuidaDD: Swallowing and speech dysfunction in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, objective preoperative and postoperative assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech15:362–3682002
HunterWBucklenBMuzumdarAMoldavskyMHussainMKhalilS: A comparative biomechanical study of traditional and in-line plating systems following immediate stabilization of single and bi-level cervical segments. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon)27:84–902012
KaramYRDahdalehNSMagnettaMJKimBSLimTHSerhanH: Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)36:E455–E4602011
McAfeePCCappuccinoACunninghamBWDevineJGPhillipsFMReganJJ: Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech23:1–82010
RileyLHIIISkolaskyRLAlbertTJVaccaroARHellerJG: Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)30:2564–25692005
Smith-HammondCANewKCPietrobonRCurtisDJScharverCHTurnerDA: Prospective analysis of incidence and risk factors of dysphagia in spine surgery patients: comparison of anterior cervical, posterior cervical and lumbar procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)29:1441–14462004
WuGSieglerSAllardPKirtleyCLeardiniARosenbaumD: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech35:543–5482002