Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Despite advances in technology and understanding in spinal physiology, reoperation for symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (ASD), same-level recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis in elderly patients continues to occur. While revision lumbar surgery is effective, attention has turned to questions on the utility and value of the revision decompression and fusion procedure. To date, an analysis of the cost and health state gain associated with revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, ASD, or same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis has yet to be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of revision surgery in elderly patients with recurrent or persistent back and leg pain.

Methods

After reviewing their institutional database, the authors found 69 patients 65 years of age and older who had undergone revision decompression and instrumented fusion for back and leg pain associated with pseudarthrosis (17 patients), same-level recurrent stenosis (24 patients), or ASD (28 patients) and included them in this study. Total 2-year back-related medical resource utilization and health state values (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs], calculated from the EQ-5D, the EuroQol-5D health survey, with US valuation) were assessed. Two-year resource use was multiplied by unit costs based on Medicare national allowable payment amounts. The mean total 2-year cost per QALY gained after revision surgery was assessed.

Results

The mean (± standard deviation) time between the index surgery and revision surgery was 3.51 ± 3.63 years. A mean cumulative 2-year gain of 0.35 QALY was observed after revision surgery. The mean total 2-year cost of revision surgery was $28,256 ± $3000 (ASD: $28,829 ± $3812, pseudarthrosis: $28,069 ± $2508, same-level recurrent stenosis: $27,871 ± $2375). Revision decompression and extension of fusion was associated with a mean 2-year cost of $80,594 per QALY gained.

Conclusions

Revision decompression and fusion provided a significant gain in health state utility for elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, same-level recurrent stenosis, or ASD, with a mean 2-year cost of $80,594 per QALY gained. When indicated, revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, same-level recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis is a valuable treatment option for elderly patients experiencing persistent back and leg pain. Findings in this study provided a value measure of surgery that can be compared with future cost-per-QALY-gained studies of medical management or alternative surgical approaches.

Abbreviations used in this paper:ASD = adjacent-segment disease; CPT = current procedural terminology; DRG = diagnosis-related group; IQR = interquartile range; QALY = quality-adjusted life year.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Owoicho Adogwa, M.D., M.P.H, 215 Light Hall, Nashville, Tennessee 37232. email: owoicho.adogwa@gmail.com.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online December 14, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12226.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing a significant improvement in health state (QALYs, calculated from the EQ-5D with US valuation) 2 years after revision with fusion for symptomatic ASD, same-level recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis. The 2-year mean cost per QALY gained after revision surgery ranged from $69,677 for same-level recurrent stenosis to $90,545 for pseudarthrosis. For all 3 cohorts, revision surgery for persistent and recurrent back and leg pain was shown to be moderately cost-effective.

References

1

Adogwa OCarr RKKudyba KKarikari IBagley CAGokaslan ZL: Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine [epub ahead of print December 14 2012. DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12224]

2

Adogwa OParker SLShau DNMendenhall SKDevin CJCheng JS: Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion for adjacent-segment disease: defining the value of surgical intervention. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:1411462012

3

Amundsen TWeber HNordal HJMagnaes BAbdelnoor MLilleas F: Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:142414262000

4

Badia XDiaz-Prieto AGorriz MTHerdman MTorrado HFarrero E: Using the EuroQol-5D to measure changes in quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:190119072001

5

Bala MMRiemsma RPNixon JKleijnen J: Systematic review of the (cost-)effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for people with failed back surgery syndrome. Clin J Pain 24:7417562008

6

Carreon LYPuno RMDimar JR IIGlassman SDJohnson JR: Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:208920922003

7

Cassinelli EHEubanks JVogt MFurey CYoo JBohlman HH: Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2302352007

8

Chen WJLai PLNiu CCChen LHFu TSWong CB: Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E519E5242001

9

Dagenais SCaro JHaldeman S: A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 8:8202008

10

Deyo RAMartin BIKreuter WJarvik JGAngier HMirza SK: Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:197919862011

11

Deyo RAMirza SK: Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:1391462006

12

Deyo RAMirza SKMartin BI: Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:272427272006

13

Deyo RAMirza SKMartin BI: Error in trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 306:10882011. (Letter)

14

Deyo RAMirza SKMartin BIKreuter WGoodman DCJarvik JG: Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:125912652010

15

Djurasovic MGlassman SDHoward JMCopay AGCarreon LY: Health-related quality of life improvements in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion as a revision surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2692762011

16

Drewett RFMinns RJSibly TF: Measuring outcome of total knee replacement using quality of life indices. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74:2862901992

17

Ebeling UKalbarcyk HReulen HJ: Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. Timing, surgical findings, and outcome in 92 patients. J Neurosurg 70:3974041989

18

Jansson KANémeth GGranath FJönsson BBlomqvist P: Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:2102162009

19

Johnson JACoons SJErgo ASzava-Kovats G: Valuation of EuroQOL (EQ-5D) health states in an adult US sample. Pharmacoeconomics 13:4214331998

20

Martin BIDeyo RAMirza SKTurner JAComstock BAHollingworth W: Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA 299:6566642008

21

Ozgen SNaderi SOzek MMPamir MN: Findings and outcome of revision lumbar disc surgery. J Spinal Disord 12:2872921999

22

Ragab AAFye MABohlman HH: Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:3483532003

23

Räsänen PPaavolainen PSintonen HKoivisto AMBlom MRyynänen OP: Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 78:1081152007

24

Santos ERGoss DGMorcom RKFraser RD: Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:99710012003

25

Schlegel JDSmith JASchleusener RL: Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:9709811996

26

Shabat SArinzon ZGepstein RFolman Y: Long-term follow-up of revision decompressive lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:1421452011

27

Torrance GW: Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 5:1301986

28

Tosteson ANLurie JDTosteson TDSkinner JSHerkowitz HAlbert T: Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. Ann Intern Med 149:8458532008

29

Weiner DKKim YSBonino PWang T: Low back pain in older adults: are we utilizing healthcare resources wisely?. Pain Med 7:1431502006

30

Weinstein JNLurie JDOlson PRBronner KKFisher ES: United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:270727142006

31

Weinstein JNLurie JDTosteson TDTosteson ANBlood EAAbdu WA: Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:278928002008

32

Weinstein JNTosteson TDLurie JDTosteson ANBlood EHanscom B: Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:7948102008

33

Weinstein JNTosteson TDLurie JDTosteson ANHanscom BSkinner JS: Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 296:244124502006

34

Zheng FSandhu HSCammisa FP JrGirardi FPKhan SN: Predictors of functional outcome in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery. J Spinal Disord 14:5185212001

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 46 46 14
Full Text Views 83 83 24
PDF Downloads 91 91 17
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar