Sagittal spinopelvic malalignment is a significant cause of pain and disability in patients with adult spinal deformity. Surgical correction of spinopelvic malalignment can result in compensatory changes in spinal alignment outside of the fused spinal segments. These compensatory changes, termed reciprocal changes, have been defined for thoracic and lumbar regions but not for the cervical spine. The object of this study was to evaluate postoperative reciprocal changes within the cervical spine following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO).
This was a multicenter retrospective radiographic analysis of patients from International Spine Study Group centers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: adults (>18 years old) with spinal deformity treated using lumbar PSO, a preoperative C7–S1 plumb line greater than 5 cm, and availability of pre- and postoperative full-length standing radiographs.
Seventy-five patients (60 women, mean age 59 years) were included. The lumbar PSO significantly improved sagittal alignment, including the C7–S1 plumb line, C7–T12 inclination, and pelvic tilt (p <0.001). After lumbar PSO, reciprocal changes were seen to occur in C2–7 cervical lordosis (from 30.8° to 21.6°, p <0.001), C2–7 plumb line (from 27.0 mm to 22.9 mm), and T-1 slope (from −38.9° to −30.4°, p <0.001). Ideal correction of sagittal malalignment (postoperative sagittal vertical alignment < 50 mm) was associated with the greatest relaxation of cervical hyperlordosis (−12.4° vs −5.7°, p = 0.037). A change in cervical lordosis correlated with changes in T-1 slope (r = −0.621, p <0.001), C7–T12 inclination (r = 0.418, p <0.001), T12–S1 angle (r = −0.339, p = 0.005), and C7–S1 plumb line (r = 0.289, p = 0.018). Radiographic parameters that correlated with changes in cervical lordosis on multivariate linear regression analysis included change in T-1 slope and change in C2–7 plumb line (r2 = 0.53, p <0.001).
Adults with positive sagittal spinopelvic malalignment compensate with abnormally increased cervical lordosis in an effort to maintain horizontal gaze. Surgical correction of sagittal malalignment results in improvement of the abnormal cervical hyperlordosis through reciprocal changes.
Abbreviations used in this paper:ASD = adult spinal deformity; ISSG = International Spine Study Group; LL = lumbar lordosis; PI = pelvic incidence; PSO = pedicle subtraction osteotomy; PT = pelvic tilt; SS = sacral slope; SVA = sagittal vertical alignment; TK = thoracic kyphosis.
Address correspondence to: Christopher P. Ames, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, A850, San Francisco, California 94143-0112. email: email@example.com.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online August 3, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.SPINE1250.
BlondelBSchwabFAmesCPLeHuecJCSmithJSDemakakosJ: The crucial role of cervical alignment in regulating sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in human standing posture. Presented at the 19th International Meeting on Advanced Spine TechniquesIstanbul TurkeyJuly 18–212012
KuntzCIVLevinLSOndraSLShaffreyCIMorganCJ: Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine6:104–1122007
LafageVSchwabFViraSHartRBurtonDSmithJS: Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic parameter correction? Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine14:184–1912011
RosePSBridwellKHLenkeLGCronenGAMulconreyDSBuchowskiJM: Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)34:785–7912009
SchwabFLafageVBoyceRSkalliWFarcyJP: Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)31:E959–E9672006
SchwabFPatelAUngarBFarcyJPLafageV: Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)35:2224–22312010
VillavicencioATBabuskaJMAshtonABuschERoecaCNelsonEL: Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery68:1309–13162011