Single-session and multisession CyberKnife radiosurgery for spine metastases—University of Pittsburgh and Georgetown University experience

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute;
  • 2 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center;
  • 3 Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
  • 4 Departments of Radiation Oncology and
  • 5 Neurosurgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The authors compared the effectiveness of single-session (SS) and multisession (MS) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of spinal metastases.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the clinical outcomes of 348 lesions in 228 patients treated with the CyberKnife radiosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Georgetown University Medical Center. One hundred ninety-five lesions were treated using an SS treatment regimen (mean 16.3 Gy), whereas 153 lesions were treated using an MS approach (mean 20.6 Gy in 3 fractions, 23.8 Gy in 4 fractions, and 24.5 Gy in 5 fractions). The primary end point was pain control. Secondary end points included neurological deficit improvement, toxicity, local tumor control, need for retreatment, and overall survival.

Results

Pain control was significantly improved in the SS group (SSG) for all measured time points up to 1 year posttreatment (100% vs 88%, p = 0.003). Rates of toxicity and neurological deficit improvement were not statistically different. Local tumor control was significantly better in the MS group (MSG) up to 2 years posttreatment (96% vs 70%, p = 0.001). Similarly, the need for retreatment was significantly lower in the MSG (1% vs 13%, p < 0.001). One-year overall survival was significantly greater in the MSG than the SSG (63% vs 46%, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Single-session and MS SRS regimens are both effective in the treatment of spinal metastases. While an SS approach provides greater early pain control and equivalent toxicity, an MS approach achieves greater tumor control and less need for retreatment in long-term survivors.

Abbreviations used in this paper:BED = biological equivalent dose; EBRT = external-beam radiation therapy; GUMC = Georgetown University Medical Center; MS = multisession; MSG = MS group; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; SS = single session; SSG = SS group; UPCI = University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Current affiliation for Dr. Gagnon: Frederick Regional Health System, Frederick, Maryland.

Current affiliation for Dr. Henderson: Doctors Community Hospital, Lanham, Maryland.

Address correspondence to: Dwight E. Heron, M.D., UPMC Cancer Pavilion, 5150 Centre Avenue, Suite 545, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232. email: HeronD2@upmc.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online May 11, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE11902.

  • 1

    Bentzen SM, , Hoskin P, , Roos D, & Nielsen OS: Fractionated radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: evidence-based medicine or...?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:681683, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Benzil DL, , Saboori M, , Mogilner AY, , Rocchio R, & Moorthy CR: Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors of the spine. J Neurosurg 101:Suppl 3 413418, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bilsky MH, , Lis E, , Raizer J, , Lee H, & Boland P: The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor. Oncologist 4:459469, 1999

  • 4

    Coleman RE: Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12:6243s6249s, 2006

  • 5

    Degen JW, , Gagnon GJ, , Voyadzis JM, , McRae DA, , Lunsden M, & Dieterich S, : CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors for pain control and quality of life. J Neurosurg Spine 2:540549, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Gagnon GJ, , Nasr NM, , Liao JJ, , Molzahn I, , Marsh D, & McRae D, : Treatment of spinal tumors using cyberknife fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery: pain and quality-of-life assessment after treatment in 200 patients. Neurosurgery 64:297307, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gaze MN, , Kelly CG, , Kerr GR, , Cull A, , Cowie VJ, & Gregor A, : Pain relief and quality of life following radiotherapy for bone metastases: a randomised trial of two fractionation schedules. Radiother Oncol 45:109116, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Gerszten PC, , Burton SA, , Belani CP, , Ramalingam S, , Friedland DM, & Ozhasoglu C, : Radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal lung metastases. Cancer 107:26532661, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Gerszten PC, , Burton SA, , Ozhasoglu C, , Vogel WJ, & Quinn AE, CyberKnife radiosurgery: single-fraction treatment for spinal tumors. Mould RF, , Schulz RA, & Bucholz RD, : Robotic Radiosurgery Sunnyvale, CA, CyberKnife Society Press, 2005. 1:171186

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gerszten PC, , Burton SA, , Ozhasoglu C, , Vogel WJ, , Welch WC, & Baar J, : Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Neurosurg Spine 3:288295, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Gerszten PC, , Burton SA, , Ozhasoglu C, & Welch WC: Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:193199, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Gerszten PC, , Burton SA, , Welch WC, , Brufsky AM, , Lembersky BC, & Ozhasoglu C, : Single-fraction radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal breast metastases. Cancer 104:22442254, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Gibbs IC, , Kamnerdsupaphon P, , Ryu MR, , Dodd R, , Kiernan M, & Chang SD, : Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for spinal metastases. Radiother Oncol 82:185190, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Haley ML, , Gerszten PC, , Heron DE, , Chang YF, , Atteberry DS, & Burton SA: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of external beam and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of spine metastases: a matched-pair analysis. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14:537542, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Hartsell WF, , Scott CB, , Bruner DW, , Scarantino CW, , Ivker RA, & Roach M III, : Randomized trial of short-versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:798804, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Henderson FC, , McCool K, , Seigle J, , Jean W, , Harter W, & Gagnon GJ: Treatment of chordomas with CyberKnife: george-town university experience and treatment recommendations. Neurosurgery 64:2 Suppl A44A53, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lutz S, , Berk L, , Chang E, , Chow E, , Hahn C, & Hoskin P, : Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:965976, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Murphy MJ, , Chang S, , Gibbs I, , Le QT, , Martin D, & Kim D: Image-guided radiosurgery in the treatment of spinal metastases. Neurosurg Focus 11:6 e6, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Nelson JW, , Yoo DS, , Sampson JH, , Isaacs RE, , Larrier NA, & Marks LB, : Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lesions of the spine and paraspinal regions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:13691375, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Patchell RA, , Tibbs PA, , Regine WF, , Payne R, , Saris S, & Kryscio RJ, : Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 366:643648, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Rades D, , Stalpers LJ, , Veninga T, , Schulte R, , Hoskin PJ, & Obralic N, : Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol 23:33663375, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Roodman GD: Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med 350:16551664, 2004

  • 23

    Ryu S, , Jin JY, , Jin R, , Rock J, , Ajlouni M, & Movsas B, : Partial volume tolerance of the spinal cord and complications of single-dose radiosurgery. Cancer 109:628636, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Sahgal A, , Bilsky M, , Chang EL, , Ma L, , Yamada Y, & Rhines LD, : Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: current status, with a focus on its application in the postoperative patient. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 14:151166, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Tong D, , Gillick L, & Hendrickson FR: The palliation of symptomatic osseous metastases: final results of the Study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer 50:893899, 1982

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Tsai JT, , Lin JW, , Chiu WT, & Chu WC: Assessment of image-guided CyberKnife radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors. J Neurooncol 94:119127, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Wowra B, , Zausinger S, , Drexler C, , Kufeld M, , Muacevic A, & Staehler M, : CyberKnife radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors: characterization of well-suited patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:29292934, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 596 228 21
Full Text Views 274 92 0
PDF Downloads 459 124 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0