Single-session and multisession CyberKnife radiosurgery for spine metastases—University of Pittsburgh and Georgetown University experience

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The authors compared the effectiveness of single-session (SS) and multisession (MS) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of spinal metastases.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the clinical outcomes of 348 lesions in 228 patients treated with the CyberKnife radiosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Georgetown University Medical Center. One hundred ninety-five lesions were treated using an SS treatment regimen (mean 16.3 Gy), whereas 153 lesions were treated using an MS approach (mean 20.6 Gy in 3 fractions, 23.8 Gy in 4 fractions, and 24.5 Gy in 5 fractions). The primary end point was pain control. Secondary end points included neurological deficit improvement, toxicity, local tumor control, need for retreatment, and overall survival.

Results

Pain control was significantly improved in the SS group (SSG) for all measured time points up to 1 year posttreatment (100% vs 88%, p = 0.003). Rates of toxicity and neurological deficit improvement were not statistically different. Local tumor control was significantly better in the MS group (MSG) up to 2 years posttreatment (96% vs 70%, p = 0.001). Similarly, the need for retreatment was significantly lower in the MSG (1% vs 13%, p < 0.001). One-year overall survival was significantly greater in the MSG than the SSG (63% vs 46%, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Single-session and MS SRS regimens are both effective in the treatment of spinal metastases. While an SS approach provides greater early pain control and equivalent toxicity, an MS approach achieves greater tumor control and less need for retreatment in long-term survivors.

Abbreviations used in this paper:BED = biological equivalent dose; EBRT = external-beam radiation therapy; GUMC = Georgetown University Medical Center; MS = multisession; MSG = MS group; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; SS = single session; SSG = SS group; UPCI = University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.

Article Information

Current affiliation for Dr. Gagnon: Frederick Regional Health System, Frederick, Maryland.

Current affiliation for Dr. Henderson: Doctors Community Hospital, Lanham, Maryland.

Address correspondence to: Dwight E. Heron, M.D., UPMC Cancer Pavilion, 5150 Centre Avenue, Suite 545, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232. email: HeronD2@upmc.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online May 11, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE11902.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Pain control in the treatment groups. Pain control, defined as the sum of the percentage of patients with decreased and stable pain, is greater in the SSG. These results are statistically significant at each time point (p < 0.05).

  • View in gallery

    Radiographic tumor control in the treatment groups. Tumor control, defined as the sum of the percentage of tumors that decreased in size and the percentage that did not grow, was better in the MSG. These results were statistically significant at each time point (p < 0.05).

  • View in gallery

    Radiosurgical plan for an L-4 spinal metastasis.

References

1

Bentzen SMHoskin PRoos DNielsen OS: Fractionated radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: evidence-based medicine or...?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:6816832000

2

Benzil DLSaboori MMogilner AYRocchio RMoorthy CR: Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors of the spine. J Neurosurg 101:Suppl 34134182004

3

Bilsky MHLis ERaizer JLee HBoland P: The diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal tumor. Oncologist 4:4594691999

4

Coleman RE: Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12:6243s6249s2006

5

Degen JWGagnon GJVoyadzis JMMcRae DALunsden MDieterich S: CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors for pain control and quality of life. J Neurosurg Spine 2:5405492005

6

Gagnon GJNasr NMLiao JJMolzahn IMarsh DMcRae D: Treatment of spinal tumors using cyberknife fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery: pain and quality-of-life assessment after treatment in 200 patients. Neurosurgery 64:2973072009

7

Gaze MNKelly CGKerr GRCull ACowie VJGregor A: Pain relief and quality of life following radiotherapy for bone metastases: a randomised trial of two fractionation schedules. Radiother Oncol 45:1091161997

8

Gerszten PCBurton SABelani CPRamalingam SFriedland DMOzhasoglu C: Radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal lung metastases. Cancer 107:265326612006

9

Gerszten PCBurton SAOzhasoglu CVogel WJQuinn AECyberKnife radiosurgery: single-fraction treatment for spinal tumors. Mould RFSchulz RABucholz RD: Robotic Radiosurgery Sunnyvale, CACyberKnife Society Press2005. 1:171186

10

Gerszten PCBurton SAOzhasoglu CVogel WJWelch WCBaar J: Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Neurosurg Spine 3:2882952005

11

Gerszten PCBurton SAOzhasoglu CWelch WC: Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1931992007

12

Gerszten PCBurton SAWelch WCBrufsky AMLembersky BCOzhasoglu C: Single-fraction radiosurgery for the treatment of spinal breast metastases. Cancer 104:224422542005

13

Gibbs ICKamnerdsupaphon PRyu MRDodd RKiernan MChang SD: Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for spinal metastases. Radiother Oncol 82:1851902007

14

Haley MLGerszten PCHeron DEChang YFAtteberry DSBurton SA: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of external beam and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of spine metastases: a matched-pair analysis. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14:5375422011

15

Hartsell WFScott CBBruner DWScarantino CWIvker RARoach M III: Randomized trial of short-versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:7988042005

16

Henderson FCMcCool KSeigle JJean WHarter WGagnon GJ: Treatment of chordomas with CyberKnife: george-town university experience and treatment recommendations. Neurosurgery 64:2 SupplA44A532009

17

Lutz SBerk LChang EChow EHahn CHoskin P: Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:9659762011

18

Murphy MJChang SGibbs ILe QTMartin DKim D: Image-guided radiosurgery in the treatment of spinal metastases. Neurosurg Focus 11:6e62001

19

Nelson JWYoo DSSampson JHIsaacs RELarrier NAMarks LB: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lesions of the spine and paraspinal regions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:136913752009

20

Patchell RATibbs PARegine WFPayne RSaris SKryscio RJ: Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 366:6436482005

21

Rades DStalpers LJVeninga TSchulte RHoskin PJObralic N: Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol 23:336633752005

22

Roodman GD: Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med 350:165516642004

23

Ryu SJin JYJin RRock JAjlouni MMovsas B: Partial volume tolerance of the spinal cord and complications of single-dose radiosurgery. Cancer 109:6286362007

24

Sahgal ABilsky MChang ELMa LYamada YRhines LD: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: current status, with a focus on its application in the postoperative patient. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 14:1511662011

25

Tong DGillick LHendrickson FR: The palliation of symptomatic osseous metastases: final results of the Study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer 50:8938991982

26

Tsai JTLin JWChiu WTChu WC: Assessment of image-guided CyberKnife radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors. J Neurooncol 94:1191272009

27

Wowra BZausinger SDrexler CKufeld MMuacevic AStaehler M: CyberKnife radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors: characterization of well-suited patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:292929342008

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 99 99 33
Full Text Views 77 77 19
PDF Downloads 180 180 32
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar