The load-sharing score (LSS) of vertebral body comminution is predictive of results after short-segment posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Some authors have posited that an LSS > 6 is predictive of neurological injury, ligamentous injury, and the need for surgical intervention. However, the authors of the present study hypothesized that the LSS does not predict ligamentous or neurological injury.
The prospectively collected spinal cord injury database from a single institution was queried for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Study inclusion criteria were acute (< 24 hours) burst fractures between T-10 and L-2 with preoperative CT and MRI. Flexion-distraction injuries and pathological fractures were excluded. Four experienced spine surgeons determined the LSS and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity. Neurological status was assessed from a review of the medical records.
Forty-four patients were included in the study. There were 4 patients for whom all observers assigned an LSS > 6, recommending operative treatment. Eleven patients had LSSs ≤ 6 across all observers, suggesting that nonoperative treatment would be appropriate. There was moderate interobserver agreement (0.43) for the overall LSS and fair agreement (0.24) for an LSS > 6. Correlations between the LSS and the PLC score averaged 0.18 across all observers (range −0.02 to 0.34, p value range 0.02–0.89). Correlations between the LSS and the American Spinal Injury Association motor score averaged −0.12 across all observers (range −0.25 to −0.03, p value range 0.1–0.87). Correlations describing the relationship between an LSS > 6 and the treating physician's decision to operate averaged 0.17 across all observers (range 0.11–0.24, p value range 0.12–0.47).
The LSS does not uniformly correlate with the PLC injury, neurological status, or empirical clinical decision making. The LSSs of only one observer correlated significantly with PLC injury. There were no significant correlations between the LSS as determined by any observer and neurological status or clinical decision making.
Abbreviations used in this paper:ASIA = American Spinal Injury Association; LSC = load-sharing classification; LSS = load-sharing score; PLC = posterior ligamentous complex.
Address correspondence to: Kris Radcliff, M.D., Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 2500 English Creek Avenue, Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08422. email: email@example.com.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online April 6, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11570.
AligizakisAKatonisPStergiopoulosKGalanakisIKarabekiosSHadjipavlouA: Functional outcome of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine managed non-operatively, with early ambulation, evaluated using the load sharing classification. Acta Orthop Belg68:279–2872002
AltayMOzkurtBAktekinCNOzturkAMDoganOTabakAY: Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures with short- or long-segment posterior fixation in magerl type a fractures. Eur Spine J16:1145–11552007
BonoCMVaccaroARHurlbertRJArnoldPOnerFCHarropJ: Validating a newly proposed classification system for thoracolumbar spine trauma: looking to the future of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score. J Orthop Trauma20:567–5722006
DaiLYJiangLSJiangSD: Conservative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a long-term follow-up results with special reference to the load sharing classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)33:2536–25442008
HabaHTaneichiHKotaniYTeraeSAbeSYoshikawaH: Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. J Neurosurg99:1 Suppl20–262003
KatonisPPaskuDAlpantakiKMavrogenisAFKorresDSSapkasGS: Combination of the AO-Magerl and load-sharing classifications for the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Orthopedics[epub ahead of print]2010
OnerFCvan GilsAPFaberJADhertWJVerboutAJ: Some complications of common treatment schemes of thoracolumbar spine fractures can be predicted with magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study of 53 patients with 71 fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)27:629–6362002
PatelAADaileyABrodkeDSDaubsMHarropJWhangPG: Thoracolumbar spine trauma classification: the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score system and case examples. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine10:201–2062009
PatelAAVaccaroARAlbertTJHilibrandASHarropJSAndersonDG: The adoption of a new classification system: time-dependent variation in interobserver reliability of the thoracolumbar injury severity score classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)32:E105–E1102007
RihnJAYangNFisherCSaravanjaDSmithHMorrisonWB: Using magnetic resonance imaging to accurately assess injury to the posterior ligamentous complex of the spine: a prospective comparison of the surgeon and radiologist. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine12:391–3962010
VaccaroARLehmanRAJrHurlbertRJAndersonPAHarrisMHedlundR: A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)30:2325–23332005
VaccaroARLimMRHurlbertRJLehmanRAJrHarropJFisherDC: Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a consensus panel review by the Spine Trauma Study Group. J Spinal Disord Tech19:1–102006
WhangPGVaccaroARPoelstraKAPatelAAAndersonDGAlbertTJ: The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)32:791–7952007