Economic burden of nonoperative treatment of adult spinal deformity

Peter G. Passias Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Peter G. Passias in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Waleed Ahmad Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Waleed Ahmad in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Pooja Dave Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Pooja Dave in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Renaud Lafage Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Renaud Lafage in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Virginie Lafage Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Virginie Lafage in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Jamshaid Mir Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Jamshaid Mir in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Eric O. Klineberg Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Eric O. Klineberg in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Khaled M. Kabeish Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland;

Search for other papers by Khaled M. Kabeish in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Jeffrey L. Gum Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky;

Search for other papers by Jeffrey L. Gum in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Breton G. Line Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado;

Search for other papers by Breton G. Line in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Robert Hart Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington;

Search for other papers by Robert Hart in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Douglas Burton Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas;

Search for other papers by Douglas Burton in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Justin S. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Justin S. Smith in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Christopher P. Ames Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas;

Search for other papers by Christopher P. Ames in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Christopher I. Shaffrey Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;

Search for other papers by Christopher I. Shaffrey in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Frank Schwab Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;

Search for other papers by Frank Schwab in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Richard Hostin Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas; and

Search for other papers by Richard Hostin in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Thomas Buell Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Thomas Buell in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
D. Kojo Hamilton Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by D. Kojo Hamilton in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Shay Bess Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado;

Search for other papers by Shay Bess in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD , on behalf of International Spine Study Group
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $384.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the cost utility of nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

Nonoperatively and operatively treated patients who met database criteria for ASD and in whom complete radiographic and health-related quality of life data at baseline and at 2 years were available were included. A cost analysis was completed on the PearlDiver database assessing the average cost of nonoperative treatment prior to surgical intervention based on previously published treatments (NSAIDs, narcotics, muscle relaxants, epidural steroid injections, physical therapy, and chiropractor). Utility data were calculated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) converted to SF-6D with published conversion methods. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) used a 3% discount rate to account for residual decline in life expectancy (78.7 years). Minor and major comorbidities and complications were assessed according to the CMS.gov manual’s definitions. Successful nonoperative treatment was defined as a gain in the minimum clinically importance difference (MCID) in both ODI and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)–pain scores, and failure was defined as a loss in MCID or conversion to operative treatment. Patients with baseline ODI ≤ 20 and continued ODI of ≤ 20 at 2 years were considered nonoperative successful maintenance. The average utilization of nonoperative treatment and cost were applied to the ASD cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 824 patients were included (mean age 58.24 years, 81% female, mean body mass index 27.2 kg/m2). Overall, 75.5% of patients were in the operative and 24.5% were in the nonoperative cohort. At baseline patients in the operative cohort were significantly older, had a greater body mass index, increased pelvic tilt, and increased pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch (all p < 0.05). With respect to deformity, patients in the operative group had higher rates of severe (i.e., ++) sagittal deformity according to SRS–Schwab modifiers for pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch (p < 0.05). At 2 years, patients in the operative cohort showed significantly increased rates of a gain in MCID for physical component summary of SF-36, ODI, and SRS-activity, SRS-pain, SRS-appearance, and SRS-mental scores. Cost analysis showed the average cost of nonoperative treatment 2 years prior to surgical intervention to be $2041. Overall, at 2 years patients in the nonoperative cohort had again in ODI of 0.36, did not show a gain in QALYs, and nonoperative treatment was determined to be cost-ineffective. However, a subset of patients in this cohort underwent successful maintenance treatment and had a decrease in ODI of 1.1 and a gain in utility of 0.006 at 2 years. If utility gained for this cohort was sustained to full life expectancy, patients’ cost per QALY was $18,934 compared to a cost per QALY gained of $70,690.79 for posterior-only and $48,273.49 for combined approach in patients in the operative cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ASD undergoing operative treatment at baseline had greater sagittal deformity and greater improvement in health-related quality of life postoperatively compared to patients treated nonoperatively. Additionally, patients in the nonoperative cohort overall had an increase in ODI and did not show improvement in utility gained. Patients in the nonoperative cohort who had low disability and sagittal deformity underwent successful maintenance and cost-effective treatment.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASD = adult spinal deformity; BMI = body mass index; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; LOS = length of stay; MCID = minimum clinically importance difference; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PI-LL = pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch; PT = pelvic tilt; QALY = quality-adjusted life year; SRS = Scoliosis Research Society; SVA = sagittal vertical axis.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Scheer JK, Hostin R, Robinson C, et al. Operative management of adult spinal deformity results in significant increases in QALYs gained compared to nonoperative management: analysis of 479 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(5):339347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Carter OD, Haynes SG. Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol. 1987;16(4):537544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Francis RS. Scoliosis screening of 3,000 college-aged women. The Utah Study—phase 2. Phys Ther. 1988;68(10):15131516.

  • 4

    Choi SH, Son SM, Goh TS, Park W, Lee JS. Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment in patients with adult spinal deformity with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e870e876.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, Mazel C, Guise JD, Skalli W. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(6):982991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, Lenke LG, eds. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek; 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance. Article in French. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot. 2003;89(3):218227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Brown AE, Alas H, Pierce KE, et al. Obesity negatively affects cost efficiency and outcomes following adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine J. 2020;20(4):512518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Poorman GW, Passias PG, Qureshi R, et al. Cost-utility analysis of cervical deformity surgeries using 1-year outcome. Spine J. 2018;18(9):15521557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Horn SR, Passias PG, Hockley A, et al. Cost-utility of revisions for cervical deformity correction warrants minimization of reoperations. J Spine Surg. 2018;4(4):702711.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Passias PG, Poorman GW, Bortz CA, et al. Predictors of adverse discharge disposition in adult spinal deformity and associated costs. Spine J. 2018;18(10):18451852.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Qureshi R, Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Shimer AL, Shen FH, Hassanzadeh H. A comparison of anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions: complications, readmissions, discharge dispositions, and costs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(24):18651870.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Version 28.0 ICD-10 MS-DRGs Update. CMS.gov. Accessed July 31, 2023. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/downloads/v28msdrgupdate.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Carreon LY, Glassman SD, McDonough CM, Rampersaud R, Berven S, Shainline M. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(19):20852089.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Carreon LY, Bratcher KR, Das N, Nienhuis JB, Glassman SD. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(8):678682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Sassi F. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(5):402408.

  • 17

    Murray CJ. Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):429445.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Tan-Torres T, Baltussen R, Adam T, et al., eds. Making Choices in Health: WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. World Health Organization; 2003:71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Lenke LG. Treatment of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity: past, present, and future. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(5):551567.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Passias PG, Jalai CM, Line BG, et al. Patient profiling can identify patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) at risk for conversion from nonoperative to surgical treatment: initial steps to reduce ineffective ASD management. Spine J. 2018;18(2):234244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Fu KM, Smith JS, Sansur CA, Shaffrey CI. Standardized measures of health status and disability and the decision to pursue operative treatment in elderly patients with degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(1):4247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Bess S, Line B, Fu KM, et al. The health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity: comparison of deformity types to United States population norms and chronic diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(3):224233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Gum JL, Hostin R, Robinson C, et al. Impact of cost valuation on cost-effectiveness in adult spine deformity surgery. Spine J. 2017;17(1):96101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 276 276 276
Full Text Views 40 40 40
PDF Downloads 53 53 53
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0