Procedural reimbursement for spine surgery has changed drastically over the past 20 years. A comprehensive understanding of these trends is important as major changes in reimbursement models of spine surgery continue to evolve within various spine specialties as well as broader national healthcare policy. In this study the authors evaluated the monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the 15 most common spinal surgery procedures from 2000 to 2021.
The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project database (2019) was queried to determine the 15 most commonly performed spine surgery procedures. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for each of these procedures were obtained from the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and comprehensive reimbursement data for each code were extracted. Changes in Medicare reimbursement rates were calculated and averaged for each procedure as both raw percent changes and percent changes adjusted for inflation to 2021 US dollars (USD) based on the consumer price index (CPI). The adjusted R2 value, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and both the average annual and the total percent change in reimbursement were calculated based on these adjusted trends for all included procedures.
After adjustment for inflation, average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 33.8% from 2000 to 2021. The greatest mean decrease was seen in anterior cervical arthrodesis (−38.7%), while the smallest mean decrease was in vertebral body excision (−17.1%). From 2000 to 2021, the adjusted reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 1.9% each year, with an average R2 value of 0.69.
This is the first study to evaluate monetary trends in Medicare reimbursement for spine surgery procedures. After adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the 15 most commonly performed spine procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2021. Increased awareness of these trends and the forces driving them will be critical in the coming years as negotiations regarding reimbursement models continue to unfold. Greater understanding of spine surgery reimbursement among policy makers, hospitals, and surgeons will be important to ensure continued access to quality surgical spine care in the United States.
APM = alternative payment model; CAGR = compound annual growth rate; CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CPI = consumer price index; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; GPCI = geographic practice cost index; MACRA = Medicare Access and Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act; RVU = relative value unit; SGR = Sustainable Growth Rate; USD = US dollars.
VuCC, LanniTB, NandalurSR. Trends in Medicare reimbursement and work relative value unit production in radiation oncology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(6):870–875.10.1016/j.jacr.2018.02.00529615363)| false
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Board of Trustees. 2021Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds. Accessed February 14, 2022.https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2021-medicare-trustees-report.pdf33316331)| false
Medicare physician payment: why it’s still a problem, and what to do now. Health Affairs Blog, January 27, 2017.Accessed February 14, 2022.https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20170127.058490/full/)| false
KimDH, LloydC, FernandezDK, SpielmanA, BradshawD. A direct experience in a new accountable care organization: results, challenges, and the role of the neurosurgeon. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(4S):S42–S49.10.1093/neuros/nyw173)| false
UppalS, ShahinMS, RathbunJA, GoffBA. Since surgery isn’t getting any easier, why is reimbursement going down? An update from the SGO taskforce on coding and reimbursement. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(2):235–237.
UppalS, ShahinMS, RathbunJA, GoffBA. Since surgery isn’t getting any easier, why is reimbursement going down? An update from the SGO taskforce on coding and reimbursement. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(2):235–237.2728750710.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.008)| false
KayeDR, YeZ, LiJ, The stability of physician-specific episode costs for urologic cancer surgery: implications for urologists under the merit-based incentive program. Urology. 2019;123:114–119.10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.05130125647)| false
SquitieriL, ChungKC. Value-based payment reform and the Medicare Access and Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):205–214.
SquitieriL, ChungKC. Value-based payment reform and the Medicare Access and Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):205–214.10.1097/PRS.000000000000343128272277)| false
Medicare Program; CY 2021 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment Policies. Document Number: 2020-17127. Accessed February 14, 2022.https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/17/2020-17127/medicare-program-cy-2021-payment-policies-under-the-physician-fee-schedule-and-other-changes-to-part)| false