Early mobilization versus bed rest for incidental durotomy: an institutional cohort study

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $376.00
USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess whether flat bed rest for > 24 hours after an incidental durotomy improves patient outcome or is a risk factor for medical and wound complications and longer hospital stay.

METHODS

Medical records of consecutive patients undergoing thoracic and lumbar decompression procedures from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Operative notes and progress notes were reviewed and searched to identify patients in whom incidental durotomies occurred. The need for revision surgery related to CSF leak or wound infection was recorded. The duration of bed rest, length of hospital stay, and complications (pulmonary, gastrointestinal, urinary, and wound) were recorded. The rates of complications were compared with regard to the duration of bed rest (≤ 24 hours vs > 24 hours).

RESULTS

A total of 420 incidental durotomies were identified, indicating a rate of 6.7% in the patient population. Of the 420 patients, 361 underwent primary repair of the dura; 254 patients were prescribed bed rest ≤ 24 hours, and 107 patients were prescribed bed rest > 24 hours. There was no statistically significant difference in the need for revision surgery (7.87% vs 8.41%, p = 0.86) between the two groups, but wound complications were increased in the prolonged bed rest group (8.66% vs 15.89%, p = 0.043). The average length of stay for patients with bed rest ≤ 24 hours was 4.47 ± 3.64 days versus 7.24 ± 4.23 days for patients with bed rest > 24 hours (p < 0.0001). There was a statistically significant increase in the frequency of ileus, urinary retention, urinary tract infections, pulmonary issues, and altered mental status in the group with prolonged bed rest after an incidental durotomy. The relative risk of complications in the group with bed rest ≤ 24 hours was 50% less than the group with > 24 hours of bed rest (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.39–0.62; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, the rate of revision surgery was not higher in patients with durotomy who underwent immediate mobilization, and medical complications were significantly decreased. Flat bed rest > 24 hours following incidental durotomy was associated with increased length of stay and increased rate of medical complications. After primary repair of an incidental durotomy, flat bed rest may not be necessary and appears to be associated with higher costs and complications.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; DVT = deep venous thrombosis; LOS = length of stay.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $376.00
USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Ishikura H, Ogihara S, Oka H, et al. Risk factors for incidental durotomy during posterior open spine surgery for degenerative diseases in adults: a multicenter observational study. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188038.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Du JY, Aichmair A, Kueper J, et al. Incidental durotomy during spinal surgery: a multivariate analysis for risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(22):E1339E1345.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Guerin P, El Fegoun AB, Obeid I, et al. Incidental durotomy during spine surgery: incidence, management and complications. A retrospective review. Injury. 2012;43(4):397401.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Baker GA, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ, et al. Risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery: a multivariate analysis. Spine J. 2012;12(2):121126.

  • 5

    McMahon P, Dididze M, Levi AD. Incidental durotomy after spinal surgery: a prospective study in an academic institution. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(1):3036.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D. Incidental dural tear in spine surgery: analysis of a nationwide database. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(2):389394.

  • 7

    Takahashi Y, Sato T, Hyodo H, et al. Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: risk factors and anatomic locations: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(2):165169.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD. Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine. Management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(12):17281732.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Williams BJ, Sansur CA, Smith JS, et al. Incidence of unintended durotomy in spine surgery based on 108,478 cases. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):117124.

  • 10

    Sin AH, Caldito G, Smith D, Rashidi M, Willis B, Nanda A. Predictive factors for dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in patients undergoing lumbar surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(3):224227.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Bosacco SJ, Gardner MJ, Guille JT. Evaluation and treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(389):238247.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Gautschi OP, Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Tessitore E, Schaller K. Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery—a three-nation survey to evaluate its management. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156(9):18131820.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Oitment C, Aref M, Almenawar S, Reddy K. Spinal dural repair: a Canadian questionnaire. Global Spine J. 2018;8(4):359364.

  • 14

    Herren C, Sobottke R, Mannion AF, et al. Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(10):24832495.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    d’Astorg H, Szadkowski M, Vieira TD, et al. Management of incidental durotomy: results from a nationwide survey conducted by the French Society of Spine Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2020;143:e188e192.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Gautschi OP, Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Schaller K. Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery - is there still a role for flat bed rest? Spine J. 2014;14(10):25222523.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Radcliff KE, Sidhu GDS, Kepler CK, et al. Complications of flat bed rest after incidental durotomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(7):281284.

  • 18

    Robson CH, Paranathala MP, Dobson G, Ly F, Brown DP, O’Reilly G. Early mobilisation does not increase the complication rate from unintended lumbar durotomy. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;32(6):13.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Farshad M, Aichmair A, Wanivenhaus F, Betz M, Spirig J, Bauer DE. No benefit of early versus late ambulation after incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(1):141146.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Low JCM, von Niederhäusern B, Rutherford SA, King AT. Pilot study of perioperative accidental durotomy: does the period of postoperative bed rest reduce the incidence of complication? Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27(6):800802.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Kögl N, Schenk L, Preuss Hernandez C, Thomé C, Petr O. Bed rest after incidental durotomy in lumbar surgery. A redundant measure in case of watertight dural repair. J Neurosurg Sci. Published online November 27, 2020. doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.20.05143-7

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Brower RG. Consequences of bed rest. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):S422S428.

  • 23

    Talec P, Gaujoux S, Samama CM. Early ambulation and prevention of post-operative thrombo-embolic risk. J Visc Surg. 2016;153(6S):S11S14.

  • 24

    Hamburg NM, McMackin CJ, Huang AL, et al. Physical inactivity rapidly induces insulin resistance and microvascular dysfunction in healthy volunteers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(12):26502656.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Puvanesarajah V, Hassanzadeh H. The true cost of a dural tear: medical and economic ramifications of incidental durotomy during lumbar discectomy in elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(10):770776.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Strömqvist F, Sigmundsson FG, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Karlsson MK. Incidental durotomy in degenerative lumbar spine surgery – a register study of 64,431 operations. Spine J. 2019;19(4):624630.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Buck JS, Yoon ST. The incidence of durotomy and its clinical and economic impact in primary, short-segment lumbar fusion: an analysis of 17,232 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(18):14441450.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Kothe R, Quante M, Engler N, et al. The effect of incidental dural lesions on outcome after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: results of a multi-center study with 800 patients. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(10):25042511.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Nandyala SV, Elboghdady IM, Marquez-Lara A, Noureldin MNB, Sankaranarayanan S, Singh K. Cost analysis of incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(17):E1042E1051.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Alluri R, Kang HP, Bouz G, Wang J, Hah RJ. The true effect of a lumbar dural tear on complications and cost. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(3):E155E162.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Convertino VA. Cardiovascular consequences of bed rest: effect on maximal oxygen uptake. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(2):191196.

  • 32

    Kazarian ER, Lopez WY, Eizember S, et al. Incidental durotomy is associated with increased risk of delirium in patients aged 65 and older. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(17):12151220.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Than KD, Wang AC, Etame AB, La Marca F, Park P. Postoperative management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008;51(5):263266.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, Covington LA. Management of incidental durotomy without mandatory bed rest. A retrospective review of 20 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(19):20622064.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Waisman M, Schweppe Y. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage after lumbar spine operations. Conservative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(1):5253.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1447 1447 151
Full Text Views 209 209 6
PDF Downloads 325 325 11
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0