Editorial. Navigation in spine surgery: an innovation here to stay

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Perdomo-Pantoja A, Ishida W, Zygourakis C, Holmes C, Iyer RR, et al. Accuracy of current techniques for placement of pedicle screws in the spine: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 51,161 screws. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:664678.e3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Molliqaj G, Schatlo B, Alaid A, Solomiichuk V, Rohde V, et al. Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(5):E14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Fiani B, Quadri SA, Ramakrishnan V, Berman B, Khan Y, Siddiqi J. Retrospective review on accuracy: a Pilot study of robotically guided thoracolumbar/sacral pedicle screws versus fluoroscopy-guided and computerized tomography stealth-guided screws. Cureus. 2017;9(7):e1437.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Jiang B, Karim Ahmed A, Zygourakis CC, Kalb S, Zhu AM, et al. Pedicle screw accuracy assessment in ExcelsiusGPS® robotic spine surgery: evaluation of deviation from pre-planned trajectory. Chin Neurosurg J. 2018;4:23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Laudato PA, Pierzchala K, Schizas C. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy using O-arm, robotic guidance, or freehand technique: a comparative study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2018;43(6):E373E378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Gao S, Lv Z, Fang H. Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(4):921930.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Schröder ML, Staartjes VE. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(5):E12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Liu H, Chen W, Wang Z, Lin J, Meng B, Yang H. Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J CARS. 2016;11(12):22732281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, Rachwal-Czyzewicz I, Renovanz M, et al. Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(5):E11.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM, Rajpal S, Burneikiene S, et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(2):196203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):170178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Chan A, Parent E, Narvacan K, San C, Lou E. Intraoperative image guidance compared with free-hand methods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior spinal surgery: a systematic review on screw-related complications and breach rates. Spine J. 2017;17(9):12151229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Liu A, Jin Y, Cottrill E, Khan M, Westbroek E, et al. Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality–assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws. J Neurosurg Spine. Published online October 8, 2021. doi:10.3171/2021.2.SPINE202097

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1990;15(1):1114.

  • 15

    van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, Köchling M, Höss N. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(17):E986E991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Onen MR, Simsek M, Naderi S. Robotic spine surgery: a preliminary report. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(4):512518.

  • 17

    Khan A, Meyers JE, Siasios I, Pollina J. Next-generation robotic spine surgery: first report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019;17(1):6169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Huntsman KT, Ahrendtsen LA, Riggleman JR, Ledonio CG. Robotic-assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(1):199203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Jiang B, Pennington Z, Zhu A, Matsoukas S, Ahmed AK, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement accuracy and instrumentation reliability based on a preplanned trajectory. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(4):519528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Lonjon N, Chan-Seng E, Costalat V, Bonnafoux B, Vassal M, Boetto J. Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(3):947955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Han X, Tian W, Liu Y, Liu B, He D, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(5):615622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Vaccaro AR, Panchmatia JR, Kaye D, Prasad SK. Barriers to adoption of new technology. In: Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery.1st ed. Thieme Medical Publishers;2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Mendelsohn D, Strelzow J, Dea N, Ford NL, Batke J, et al. Patient and surgeon radiation exposure during spinal instrumentation using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation. Spine J. 2016;16(3):343354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Bandela JR, Jacob RP, Arreola M, Griglock TM, Bova F, Yang M. Use of CT-based intraoperative spinal navigation: management of radiation exposure to operator, staff, and patients. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(2):390394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Nottmeier EW, Bowman C, Nelson KL. Surgeon radiation exposure in cone beam computed tomography-based, image-guided spinal surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(2):196200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lange J, Karellas A, Street J, Eck JC, Lapinsky A, et al. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013;38(5):E306E312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1

    Gumprecht HK, Widenka DC, Lumenta CB. BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(1):97105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press of Glencoe;1962.

  • 3

    Moore GA. Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers. HarperBusiness;1991.

  • 4

    Dibble CF, Molina CA. Device profile of the XVision-spine (XVS) augmented-reality surgical navigation system: overview of its safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18(1):18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 185 185 112
Full Text Views 24 24 4
PDF Downloads 29 29 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0