Predictors of neurologic outcome after surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament differ based on myelopathy severity: a multicenter study

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Yongin;
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul;
  • 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seoul;
  • 4 Department of Neurosurgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;
  • 5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;
  • 6 Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the 4th Teaching Hospital of Peking University, Beijing;
  • 7 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, China;
  • 8 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York;
  • 9 Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York;
  • 10 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; and
  • 11 POSTECH Biotech Center, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, Korea
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare prognostic factors for neurological recovery in patients undergoing surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) based on their presenting mild, moderate, or severe myelopathy.

METHODS

The study included 372 consecutive patients with OPLL who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy between 2006 and 2016 in East Asian countries with a high OPLL prevalence. Baseline and postoperative clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) myelopathy score and recovery ratio. Radiographic assessment included occupying ratio, cervical range of motion, and sagittal alignment parameters. Patient myelopathy was classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on the preoperative JOA score. Linear and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify patient and surgical factors associated with neurological recovery stratified by baseline myelopathy severity.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 45.4 months (range 25–140 months). The mean preoperative and postoperative JOA scores and recovery ratios for the total cohort were 11.7 ± 3.0, 14.5 ± 2.7, and 55.2% ± 39.3%, respectively. In patients with mild myelopathy, only age and diabetes correlated with recovery. In patients with moderate to severe myelopathy, older age and preoperative increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging were significantly correlated with a lower likelihood of recovery, while female sex and anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) were associated with better recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Various patient and surgical factors are correlated with likelihood of neurological recovery after surgical treatment for cervical OPLL, depending on the severity of presenting myelopathy. Older age, male sex, intramedullary high signal intensity, and posterior decompression are associated with less myelopathy improvement in patients with worse baseline function. Therefore, myelopathy-specific preoperative counseling regarding prognosis for postoperative long-term neurological improvement should include consideration of these individual and surgical factors.

ABBREVIATIONS ACCF = anterior cervical corpectomy fusion; ADF = anterior decompression with fusion; BMI = body mass index; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; ROM = range of motion; SI = signal intensity; T2WI = T2-weighted images; VAS-neck = visual analog scale for neck pain.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Tables and Figures (PDF 1,976 KB)

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Yoon Ha: Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hayoon@yuhs.ac.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 12, 2021; DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE20504.

Disclosures Dr. Cheung reports receiving support from Avalon SpinCare, AO Spine, Medtronic, NuVasive, and OrthoSmart. Dr. Hoh reports receiving a stipend as a member of The Spine Journal editorial board.

  • 1

    Wu JC, Chen YC, Huang WC.. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in cervical spine: prevalence, management, and prognosis. Neurospine. 2018;15(1):3341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Deora H, Kim SH, Behari S, . Anterior surgical techniques for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):408420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Tetreault LA, Kopjar B, Vaccaro A, . A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(18):16591666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, . A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3)(suppl):70S83S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Nakashima H, Kanemura T, Kanbara S, . What are the important predictors of postoperative functional recovery in patients with cervical OPLL? Results of a multivariate analysis. Global Spine J. 2019;9(3):315320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Sato H, . Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(1):122126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Sumi M, Miyamoto H, Suzuki T, . Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(1):814.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Lee CK, Shin DA, Yi S, . Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(1):100107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Choi JH, Shin JJ, Kim TH, . Does intramedullary signal intensity on MRI affect the surgical outcomes of patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament?. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56(2):121129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Shin JJ, Jin BH, Kim KS, . Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(10):16871694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Khan I, Archer KR, Wanner JP, . Trajectory of improvement in myelopathic symptoms from 3 to 12 months following surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(6):763768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, . Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001;26(17):18901895.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kong LD, Meng LC, Wang LF, . Evaluation of conservative treatment and timing of surgical intervention for mild forms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Exp Ther Med. 2013;6(3):852856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kwon SY, Shin JJ, Lee JH, Cho WH.. Prognostic factors for surgical outcome in spinal cord injury associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:94.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Badhiwala JH, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, . Efficacy and safety of surgery for mild degenerative cervical myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America and international prospective multicenter studies. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(4):890897.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, . Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013;38(5):392400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Fidelman Z, Gepstein R.. Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(1):3237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, . Impact of diabetes on the outcomes of cervical laminoplasty: a prospective cohort study of more than 500 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2014;39(3):220227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Cook C, Roman M, Stewart KM, . Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of clinical special tests for myelopathy in patients seen for cervical dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(3):172178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Cho YE, Shin JJ, Kim KS, . The relevance of intramedullary high signal intensity and gadolinium (Gd-DTPA) enhancement to the clinical outcome in cervical compressive myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(12):22672274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Kim B, Yoon DH, Shin HC, . Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2015;15(5):875884.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Vaziri S, Lockney DT, Dru AB, . Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after fusion?. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):483491.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, . Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11(2):130141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Head J, Rymarczuk G, Stricsek G, . Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: surgical approaches and associated complications. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):517529.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Lee SH, Kim KT, Lee JH, . 540° cervical realignment procedure for extensive cervical OPLL with kyphotic deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(24):18761883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lee DH, Joo YS, Hwang CJ, . A novel technique to correct kyphosis in cervical myelopathy due to continuous-type ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(3):325330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Sakai K, Yoshii T, Hirai T, . Impact of the surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy on the preoperative cervical sagittal balance: a review of prospective comparative cohort between ADF and laminoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(1):104112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Ha Y, Shin JJ.. Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes in cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(5):14091421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Hukuda S, Kojima Y.. Sex discrepancy in the canal/body ratio of the cervical spine implicating the prevalence of cervical myelopathy in men. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2002;27(3):250253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, . Postoperative changes in spinal cord signal intensity in patients with cervical compression myelopathy: comparison between preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(6):524528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Uchida K, Nakajima H, Takeura N, . Prognostic value of changes in spinal cord signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. Spine J. 2014;14(8):16011610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Tetreault L, Wilson JR, Kotter MR, . Predicting the minimum clinically important difference in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40(6):E14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Fargen KM, Cox JB, Hoh DJ.. Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after laminoplasty? Radiographic and clinical evidence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament lesion growth and the risk factors for late neurologic deterioration. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(6):512524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K.. Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2)(suppl):180189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 547 547 519
Full Text Views 59 59 51
PDF Downloads 53 53 47
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0