Intrawound vancomycin application after spinal surgery: a propensity score–matched cohort analysis

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Surgery,
  • 2 School of Public Health,
  • 3 Medical School, and
  • 4 Department of Orthopedics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery is associated with increased morbidity and healthcare costs. In an effort to reduce SSI rates, the application of intrawound vancomycin powder has gained popularity. However, there is limited high-quality evidence to support the safety and efficacy of this practice. The authors sought to determine if intrawound application of vancomycin powder improves 90-day overall SSI rates.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective, vancomycin exposure–matched cohort study at a single tertiary care hospital over 21 months. They included all patients undergoing elective spinal surgery and stratified the patients into two groups: those who received intrawound vancomycin powder application and those who received no application of vancomycin powder. The primary outcome of interest was the 90-day overall SSI rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of superficial SSI, deep SSI, wound disruption, and a post hoc analysis of the microbiology and minimum inhibitory concentrations. Baseline patient demographics, clinical presentation, comorbidities, perioperative factors, and 90-day postoperative outcomes were manually abstracted from patient charts. To mitigate bias, we performed 1:1 matching after calculating propensity scores and identified 1 patient from the no-vancomycin cohort for each patient in the vancomycin cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 997 patients met our inclusion criteria (473 patients receiving vancomycin and 524 patients not receiving vancomycin). Propensity score matching produced 221 matched pairs. Risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated similar overall SSI rates between the groups (OR 1.9, p = 0.329). On unadjusted analysis, the overall 90-day SSI rate was greater in the vancomycin group (n = 10 [4.5%]) than in the no-vancomycin group (n = 5 [2.3%]) (p < 0.001), as were the superficial SSI rate (7 [3.2%] vs 4 [1.8%], p < 0.001), deep SSI rate (3 [1.4%] vs 1 [0.5%], p < 0.001), and wound disruption rate (5 [2.3%] vs 1 [0.5%], p < 0.001). No cultured isolate demonstrated vancomycin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors observed no difference in SSI rates after the intrawound application of vancomycin powder during spine surgery. Vancomycin use did not contribute to antimicrobial resistance; however, it may select out gram-negative bacteria and increase rates of wound disruption.

ABBREVIATIONSASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index; MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SSI = surgical site infection.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 401 KB)

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Victor Vakayil: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. vvakayil@umn.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 5, 2021; DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201129.

Disclosures Dr. Polly: consultant for SI Bone and Globus; clinical or research support for the study described from Mizuho OSI, Medtronic, and AO Spine; royalties from Springer; selling of patents to Globus and Medtronic; and executive committee of the American Spine Registry.

  • 1

    Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, . Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):20392046.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Awad SS. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and post-operative surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012;13(4):234237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Koutsoumbelis S, Hughes AP, Girardi FP, . Risk factors for postoperative infection following posterior lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(17):16271633.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, . The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(4):183189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, . Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298(15):17631771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Texakalidis P, Lu VM, Yolcu Y, . Impact of powdered vancomycin on preventing surgical site infections in neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(3):569580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Sweet FA, Forsthoefel CW, Sweet AR, Dahlberg RK. Local versus systemic antibiotics for surgical infection prophylaxis in a rat model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(18):e120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Fleischman AN, Austin MS. Local intra-wound administration of powdered antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017;2(1):2328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Martin JR, Adogwa O, Brown CR, . Experience with intrawound vancomycin powder for posterior cervical fusion surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(1):2633.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Tubaki VR, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP. Effects of using intravenous antibiotic only versus local intrawound vancomycin antibiotic powder application in addition to intravenous antibiotics on postoperative infection in spine surgery in 907 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(25):21492155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mirzashahi B, Chehrassan M, Mortazavi SMJ. Intrawound application of vancomycin changes the responsible germ in elective spine surgery without significant effect on the rate of infection: a randomized prospective study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018;102(1):3539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Ghobrial GM, Thakkar V, Andrews E, . Intraoperative vancomycin use in spinal surgery: single institution experience and microbial trends. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(7):550555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Takeuchi M, Wakao N, Kamiya M, . A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the local application of vancomycin versus ampicillin powder into the operative field for thoracic and/or lumbar fusions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(5):553559.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Schroeder JE, Girardi FP, Sandhu H, . The use of local vancomycin powder in degenerative spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(4):10291033.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Martin JR, Adogwa O, Brown CR, . Experience with intrawound vancomycin powder for spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(2):177184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Horii C, Yamazaki T, Oka H, . Does intrawound vancomycin powder reduce surgical site infection after posterior instrumented spinal surgery? A propensity score-matched analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(12):22052212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Emohare O, Ledonio CG, Hill BW, . Cost savings analysis of intrawound vancomycin powder in posterior spinal surgery. Spine J. 2014;14(11):27102715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Centers for Disease Control National Healthcare Safety Network. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Accessed October 23, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):12451251.

  • 20

    Vakayil V, Bauman B, Joppru K, . Surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcers: laparoscopic versus open approach. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(1):281292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008;27(12):20372049.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):150161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):30833107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2008;171(2):481502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Ehlers AP, Khor S, Shonnard N, . Intra-wound antibiotics and infection in spine fusion surgery: a report from Washington State’s SCOAP-CERTAIN Collaborative. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17(2):179186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Desmond J, Lovering A, Harle C, . Topical vancomycin applied on closure of the sternotomy wound does not prevent high levels of systemic vancomycin. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23(5):765770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C. Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(24):20842088.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Chotai S, Wright PW, Hale AT, . Does intrawound vancomycin application during spine surgery create vancomycin-resistant organism?. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):746753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    do Nascimento TL, Finger G, Sfreddo E, . Double-blind randomized clinical trial of vancomycin in spinal arthrodesis: no effects on surgical site infection. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;32(3):473480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Khan NR, Thompson CJ, DeCuypere M, . A meta-analysis of spinal surgical site infection and vancomycin powder. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):974983.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Xiong L, Pan Q, Jin G, . Topical intrawound application of vancomycin powder in addition to intravenous administration of antibiotics: a meta-analysis on the deep infection after spinal surgeries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(7):785789.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Ghobrial GM, Cadotte DW, Williams K Jr, . Complications from the use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spinal surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(4):E11.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Kang DG, Holekamp TF, Wagner SC, Lehman RAJ Jr. Intrasite vancomycin powder for the prevention of surgical site infection in spine surgery: a systematic literature review. Spine J. 2015;15(4):762770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998;316(7124):6166.

  • 35

    Chiang H-Y, Herwaldt LA, Blevins AE, . Effectiveness of local vancomycin powder to decrease surgical site infections: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2014;14(3):397407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Evaniew N, Khan M, Drew B, . Intrawound vancomycin to prevent infections after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(3):533542.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337(8746):867872.

  • 38

    Edin ML, Miclau T, Lester GE, . Effect of cefazolin and vancomycin on osteoblasts in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(333):245-251.

  • 39

    Eder C, Schenk S, Trifinopoulos J, . Does intrawound application of vancomycin influence bone healing in spinal surgery?. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(4):10211028.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Goldschmidt E, Rasmussen J, Chabot JD, . The effect of vancomycin powder on human dural fibroblast culture and its implications for dural repair during spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(5):665670.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Dial BL, Lampley AJ, Green CL, Hallows R. Intrawound vancomycin powder in primary total hip arthroplasty increases rate of sterile wound complications. Hip Pelvis. 2018;30(1):3744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Hoelen DWM, Tjan DHT, van Vugt R, . Severe local vancomycin induced skin necrosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64(4):553554.

  • 43

    Hanada M, Nishikino S, Hotta K, . Intrawound vancomycin powder increases post-operative wound complications and does not decrease periprosthetic joint infection in primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(7):23222327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Mirza SK, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, . Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(24):26512662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Neuman BJ, Ailon T, Scheer JK, . Development and validation of a novel adult spinal deformity surgical invasiveness score: analysis of 464 patients. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(6):847853.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1962 1962 442
Full Text Views 203 203 75
PDF Downloads 99 99 37
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0