Strategies for prevention of rod fracture in adult spinal deformity: cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, and lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Ki Young Lee MD, PhD, Jung-Hee Lee MD, PhD, Kyung-Chung Kang MD, PhD, Sang-Kyu Im MD, Hae Seong Lim MD, and Sun Whan Choi MD
View More View Less
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Restoring the proper sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) can improve radiological and clinical outcomes, but pseudarthrosis including rod fracture (RF) is a common problematic complication. The purpose of this study was to analyze the methods for reducing the incidence of RF in deformity correction of ASD.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively selected 178 consecutive patients (mean age 70.8 years) with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK) who underwent deformity correction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were classified into the non-RF group (n = 131) and the RF group (n = 47). For predicting the crucial factors of RF, patient factors, radiographic parameters, and surgical factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of RF was 26% (47/178 cases), occurring in 42% (42/100 cases) of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), 7% (5/67 cases) of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior column osteotomy, 18% (23/129 cases) of cobalt chrome rods, 49% (24/49 cases) of titanium alloy rods, 6% (2/36 cases) placed with the accessory rod technique, and 32% (45/142 cases) placed with the 2-rod technique. There were no significant differences in the incidence of RF regarding patient factors between two groups. While both groups showed severe sagittal imbalance before operation, lumbar lordosis (LL) was more kyphotic and pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL (PI-LL) mismatch was greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, while LL and PI-LL did not show significant differences between the two groups, LL and sagittal vertical axis correction were greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, at the last follow-up, the two groups did not show significant differences in radiographic parameters except thoracolumbar junctional angles. As for surgical factors, use of the cobalt chrome rod and the accessory rod technique was significantly greater in the non-RF group (p < 0.05). As for the correction method, PSO was associated with more RFs than the other correction methods, including LLIF (p < 0.05). By logistic regression analysis, PSO, preoperative PI-LL mismatch, and the accessory rod technique were crucial factors for RF.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater preoperative sagittal spinopelvic malalignment including preoperative PI-LL mismatch was the crucial risk factor for RF in LDK patients 65 years or older. For restoring and maintaining sagittal alignment, use of the cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, or LLIF was shown to be effective for reducing RF in ASD surgery.

ABBREVIATIONS ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ASD = adult spinal deformity; LDK = lumbar degenerative kyphosis; LL = lumbar lordosis; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; LSJ = lumbosacral junction; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PCO = posterior column osteotomy; PI = pelvic incidence; PI-LL = PI minus LL; PJK = proximal junctional kyphosis; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; PSO = pedicle subtraction osteotomy; PT = pelvic tilt; RF = rod fracture; rhBMP-2 = recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2; SS = sacral slope; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; TK = thoracic kyphosis; TLJ = thoracolumbar junction; VAS = visual analog scale.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Jung-Hee Lee: Graduate School, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. ljhspine@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online February 19, 2021; DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201037.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):22242231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(9):10821085.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Rinella A, Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(suppl 1):4450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Berjano P, Aebi M. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(suppl 1):S49S57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Bridwell KH. Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19)(suppl):S171S178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Barton C, Noshchenko A, Patel V, Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series. Scoliosis. 2015;10:30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O. Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(1):E60E68.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Yang BP, Ondra SL, Chen LA, Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(1):917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(4):862867.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):9941003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):22382244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Takemitsu Y, Harada Y, Iwahara T, Lumbar degenerative kyphosis. Clinical, radiological and epidemiological studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(11):13171326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(1):112120.

  • 14

    Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36” radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(4):427433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Langella F, Villafañe JH, Damilano M, Predictive accuracy of Surgimap surgical planning for sagittal imbalance: a cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(22):E1297E1304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5)(suppl 5):578585.

  • 17

    Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19)(suppl):S119S125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Lenke LG. Treatment of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity: past, present, and future. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(5):551567.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Dickson DD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester LA. Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(15):11901195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Yagi M, Fujita N, Okada E, Surgical outcomes for drop body syndrome in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(8):571578.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Lee CS, Kim YT, Kim E. Clinical study of lumbar degenerative kyphosis. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 1997;4(1):2735.

  • 23

    Lee CS, Lee CK, Kim YT, Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(18):20292035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Lee JH, Kim JU, Jang JS, Lee SH. Analysis of the incidence and risk factors for the progression of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative kyphosis: minimum 2-year follow-up. Br J Neurosurg. 2014;28(2):252258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Lee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, Sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis: classification and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(8):E538E544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lee JH, Kim KT, Lee SH, Overcorrection of lumbar lordosis for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: comparison of radiographic outcomes between overcorrection and undercorrection. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(8):26682675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Lee JH, Kim KT, Suk KS, Analysis of spinopelvic parameters in lumbar degenerative kyphosis: correlation with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(24):E1386E1391.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5)(suppl 5):609618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Lafage V, Ames C, Schwab F, Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(3):E180E187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, Maeng DH. Influence of lumbar lordosis restoration on thoracic curve and sagittal position in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(3):280284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(10):845853.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(18):20932101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Tang JA, Leasure JM, Smith JS, Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2):276283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Lindsey C, Deviren V, Xu Z, The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(15):16801687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Dick JC, Bourgeault CA. Notch sensitivity of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, and stainless steel spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(15):16681672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Shono Y, McAfee PC. Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(12):16771688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(22):18991904.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Gupta S, Eksi MS, Ames CP, A novel 4-rod technique offers potential to reduce rod breakage and pseudarthrosis in pedicle subtraction osteotomies for adult spinal deformity correction. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;14(4):449456.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Scheer JK, Tang JA, Deviren V, Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(3):330335.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(3):E8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Lee KY, Lee JH, Kang KC, Minimally invasive multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior column osteotomy compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. Spine J. 2020;20(6):925933.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(20):23292336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Boachie-Adjei O, Dendrinos GK, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS. Management of adult spinal deformity with combined anterior-posterior arthrodesis and Luque-Galveston instrumentation. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4(2):131141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Godzik J, Haglin JM, Alan N, Retrospective multicenter assessment of rod fracture after anterior column realignment in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity correction. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e400e405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Berjano P, Cecchinato R, Sinigaglia A, Anterior column realignment from a lateral approach for the treatment of severe sagittal imbalance: a retrospective radiographic study. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(suppl 3):433438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 449 449 56
Full Text Views 65 65 23
PDF Downloads 56 56 25
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0