Vertebral body fracture rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy compared with external-beam radiation therapy for metastatic spine tumors

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery and
  • 2 Radiation Oncology and
  • 3 School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is utilized to deliver highly conformal, dose-escalated radiation to a target while sparing surrounding normal structures. Spinal SBRT can allow for durable local control and palliation of disease while minimizing the risk of damage to the spinal cord; however, spinal SBRT has been associated with an increased risk of vertebral body fractures. This study sought to compare the fracture rates between SBRT and conventionally fractionated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with metastatic spine tumors.

METHODS

Records from patients treated at the University of California, San Francisco, with radiation therapy for metastatic spine tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Vertebral body fracture and local control rates were compared between SBRT and EBRT. Ninety-six and 213 patients were identified in the SBRT and EBRT groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the need to control for primary tumor histology (p = 0.003 for prostate cancer, p = 0.0496 for renal cell carcinoma). The patient-matched EBRT comparison group was created by matching SBRT cases using propensity scores for potential confounders, including the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), the number and location of spine levels treated, sex, age at treatment, duration of follow-up (in months) after treatment, and primary tumor histology. Covariate balance following group matching was confirmed using the Student t-test for unequal variance. Statistical analysis, including propensity score matching and multivariate analysis, was performed using R software and related packages.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients met inclusion criteria, with 45 SBRT and 45 EBRT matched cases. Balance of the covariates, SINS, age, follow-up time, and primary tumor histology after the matching process was confirmed between groups (p = 0.062, p = 0.174, and 0.991, respectively, along with matched tumor histology). The SBRT group had a higher 5-year rate of vertebral body fracture at 22.22% (n = 10) compared with 6.67% (n = 3) in the EBRT group (p = 0.044). Survival analysis was used to adjust for uneven follow-up time and showed a significant difference in fracture rates between the two groups (p = 0.044). SBRT also was associated with a higher rate of local control (86.67% vs 77.78%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic cancer undergoing SBRT had higher rates of vertebral body fractures compared with patients undergoing EBRT, and this difference held up after survival analysis. SBRT also had higher rates of initial local control than EBRT but this difference did not hold up after survival analysis, most likely because of a high percentage of radiosensitive tumors in the EBRT cohort.

ABBREVIATIONS BED = biologically effective dose; EBRT = external-beam radiation therapy; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy; SINS = Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score; VCF = vertebral compression fracture.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Enrique Vargas: School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA. enrique.vargas@ucsf.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 14, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.SPINE191383.

Disclosures Dr. Mummaneni: consultant for DePuy Synthes, Globus, and Stryker; direct stock ownership in Spinicity/ISD; royalties from DePuy Synthes, Thieme Publishers, and Springer Publishers; honoraria from Spineart; and non–study-related clinical or research effort from AO Spine, NREF, and ISSG. Dr. Chou: consultant for Medtronic and Globus and royalties from Globus.

  • 1

    Ahmed KA, Stauder MC, Miller RC, Stereotactic body radiation therapy in spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(5):e803e809.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Chang EL, Shiu AS, Mendel E, Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(2):151160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Wang XS, Rhines LD, Shiu AS, Stereotactic body radiation therapy for management of spinal metastases in patients without spinal cord compression: a phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):395402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Puvanesarajah V, Lo SL, Aygun N, Prognostic factors associated with pain palliation after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(5):620629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Balagamwala EH, Jung DL, Angelov L, Incidence and risk factors for vertebral compression fractures from spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: results of a large institutional series. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2013;87(2):S89.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Boehling NS, Grosshans DR, Allen PK, Vertebral compression fracture risk after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(4):379386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Faruqi S, Tseng CL, Whyne C, Vertebral compression fracture after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: a review of the pathophysiology and risk factors. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(3):314322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Jawad MS, Fahim DK, Gerszten PC, Vertebral compression fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy: a large, multi-institutional, multinational evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(6):928936.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Sahgal A, Atenafu EG, Chao S, Vertebral compression fracture after spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: a multi-institutional analysis with a focus on radiation dose and the spinal instability neoplastic score. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):34263431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Sung SH, Chang UK. Evaluation of risk factors for vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic radiosurgery in spinal tumor patients. Korean J Spine. 2014;11(3):103108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Virk MS, Han JE, Reiner AS, Frequency of symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures requiring intervention following single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(1):E8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Chang UK, Kim MS, Han CJ, Lee DH. Clinical result of stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with conventional radiation therapy. J Neurooncol. 2014;119(1):141148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Sprave T, Verma V, Förster R, Local response and pathologic fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for spinal metastases—a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):859.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Voyant C, Julian D, Roustit R, Biological effects and equivalent doses in radiotherapy: a software solution. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013;19(1):4755.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    van Leeuwen CM, Oei AL, Crezee J, The alfa and beta of tumours: a review of parameters of the linear-quadratic model, derived from clinical radiotherapy studies. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):96.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Fowler JF, Tomé WA, Fenwick JD, Mehta MP. A challenge to traditional radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(4):12411256.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kim BD, Edelstein AI, Hsu WK, Spine surgeon specialty is not a risk factor for 30-day complication rates in single-level lumbar fusion: a propensity score-matched study of 2528 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(15):E919E927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mangona VS, Aneese AM, Marina O, Toxicity after central versus peripheral lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: a propensity score matched-pair analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(1):124132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective, multicenter, propensity-matched cohort assessment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(6):851861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Haley ML, Gerszten PC, Heron DE, Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of external beam and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of spine metastases: a matched-pair analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(4):537542.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Balagamwala EH, Naik M, Reddy CA, Pain flare after stereotactic radiosurgery for spine metastases. J Radiosurg SBRT. 2018;5(2):99105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Hall WA, Stapleford LJ, Hadjipanayis CG, Stereotactic body radiosurgery for spinal metastatic disease: an evidence-based review. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:979214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Husain ZA, Sahgal A, De Salles A, Stereotactic body radiotherapy for de novo spinal metastases: systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(3):295302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Ozdemir Y, Torun N, Guler OC, Local control and vertebral compression fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases. J Bone Oncol. 2019;15:100218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Tseng CL, Eppinga W, Charest-Morin R, Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: indications, outcomes, and points of caution. Global Spine J. 2017;7(2):179197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Zeng KL, Tseng CL, Soliman H, Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic spine metastases: an overview. Front Oncol. 2019;9:337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Sohn S, Chung CK, Sohn MJ, Stereotactic radiosurgery compared with external radiation therapy as a primary treatment in spine metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter, matched-pair study. J Neurooncol. 2014;119(1):121128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Cunha MV, Al-Omair A, Atenafu EG, Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): analysis of predictive factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(3):e343e349.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Dunne EM, Fraser IM, Liu M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung, spine and oligometastatic disease: current evidence and future directions. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(14):283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Kothari G, Loblaw A, Tree AC, Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018;17:1533033818789633.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Rose PS, Laufer I, Boland PJ, Risk of fracture after single fraction image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy to spinal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):50755079.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Myrehaug S, Sahgal A, Hayashi M, Reirradiation spine stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(4):428435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 516 516 73
Full Text Views 48 48 10
PDF Downloads 33 33 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0