Residual numbness of the upper extremity after cervical surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

View More View Less
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Although numbness is one of the chief complaints of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), preoperative factors relating to residual numbness of the upper extremity (UE) and impact of the outcomes on cervical surgery are not well established. The authors hypothesized that severe preoperative UE numbness could be a risk factor for residual UE numbness after surgery and that the residual UE numbness could have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the preoperative factors that are predictive of residual UE numbness after cervical surgery and demonstrate the effects of residual UE numbness on clinical scores and radiographic parameters.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective cohort study. The authors analyzed data of 103 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty from January 2012 to December 2014 and were followed up for more than 2 years postoperatively. The patients were divided into two groups: the severe residual-numbness group (postoperative visual analog scale [VAS] score for UE numbness > 40 mm) and the no/mild residual-numbness group (VAS score ≤ 40 mm). The outcome measures were VAS score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores for cervical myelopathy, physical and mental component summaries of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), radiographic film parameters (C2–7 sagittal vertical axis, range of motion, C2–7 lordotic angle, and C7 slope), and MRI findings (severity of cervical canal stenosis, snake-eye appearance, severity of foraminal stenosis). Following univariate analysis, which compared the preoperative factors between groups, the variables with p values < 0.1 were included in the multivariate linear regression analysis. Additionally, the changes in clinical scores and radiographic parameters after 2 years of surgery were compared using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Among 103 patients, 42 (40.8%) had residual UE numbness. In the multivariate analysis, sex and preoperative UE pain were found to be independent variables correlating with residual UE numbness (p = 0.017 and 0.046, respectively). The severity of preoperative UE numbness did not relate to the residual UE numbness (p = 0.153). The improvement in neck pain VAS score and physical component summary of the SF-36 was significantly low in the severe residual-numbness group (p < 0.001 and 0.040, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-one percent of the CSM patients experienced residual UE numbness for at least 2 years after cervical posterior decompression surgery. Female sex and preoperative severe UE pain were the predictive factors for residual UE numbness. The patients with residual UE numbness showed less improvement of neck pain and lower physical status compared to the patients without numbness.

ABBREVIATIONS ACDF = anterior cervical decompression and fusion; β = unstandardized partial regression coefficient; CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; cSVA = C2–7 sagittal vertical axis; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MCID = minimal clinically important difference; MCS = mental component summary; PCS = physical component summary; ROM = range of motion; SF-36 = 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; UE = upper extremity; VAS = visual analog scale.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Koji Tamai: Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. koji.tamai@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online July 31, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.SPINE191566.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981; 6(4): 354364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (359): 3548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(5): 507510.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(5): 479487.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Wang MY, Green BA. Laminoplasty for the treatment of failed anterior cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2003; 15(3): E7.

  • 6

    Machino M, Imagama S, Ando K, Characteristics of residual symptoms after laminoplasty in diabetic patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017; 42(12): E708E715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gibson J, Nouri A, Krueger B, Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a clinical review. Yale J Biol Med. 2018; 91(1): 4348.

  • 8

    Machino M, Ando K, Kobayashi K, The feature of clinical and radiographic outcomes in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective cohort study on 1025 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(12): 817823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kato S, Oshima Y, Matsubayashi Y, Minimum clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score in degenerative cervical myelopathy patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(10): 691697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Goh GS, Liow MHL, Ling ZM, Severity of preoperative myelopathy symptoms affects patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction and return to work after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45(10): 649656.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8(7): 693699.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Tamai K, Suzuki A, Terai H, Laminar closure after expansive open-door laminoplasty: fixation methods and cervical alignments impact on the laminar closure and surgical outcomes. Spine J. 2016; 16(9): 10621069.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Article in Japanese. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1994; 68: 490530.

  • 14

    Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974; 2(7889): 11271131.

  • 15

    Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11): 10371044.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Andresen AK, Paulsen RT, Busch F, Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction after surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(7): 703708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Badhiwala JH, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Minimum clinically important difference in SF-36 scores for use in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(21): E1260E1266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010; 10(6): 469474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Gerbershagen HJ, Rothaug J, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 107(4): 619626.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kimura A, Shiraishi Y, Inoue H, Predictors of persistent axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(1): 1015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71(3)(suppl 1): 662669.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Tamai K, Buser Z, Paholpak P, Can C7 slope substitute the T1 slope? An analysis using cervical radiographs and kinematic MRIs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(7): 520525.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH, New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(1): W134W140.

  • 24

    Mizuno J, Nakagawa H, Inoue T, Hashizume Y. Clinicopathological study of “snake-eye appearance” in compressive myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(2)(suppl): 162168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Kim S, Lee JW, Chai JW, A new MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on axial T2-weighted images. Korean J Radiol. 2015; 16(6): 12941302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Kong CB, Jeon DW, Chang BS, Outcome of spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a cross-sectional study in Korea. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(15): 14891494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 177 177 177
Full Text Views 22 22 22
PDF Downloads 28 28 28
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0