Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a useful minimally invasive approach for select spinal disorders, but implant subsidence may occur in up to 30% of patients. Previous studies have suggested that wider implants reduce the subsidence rate. This study aimed to evaluate whether a mismatch of the endplate and implant area can predict the rate and grade of implant subsidence.
The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF between July 2008 and June 2015; 297 patients (623 surgical levels) met inclusion criteria. Imaging studies were examined to grade graft subsidence according to Marchi criteria. Thirty patients had radiographic evidence of implant subsidence. The endplates above and below the implant were measured.
A total of 30 patients with implant subsidence were identified. Of these patients, 6 had Marchi grade 0, 4 had grade I, 12 had grade II, and 8 had grade III implant subsidence. There was no statistically significant correlation between the endplate-implant area mismatch and subsidence grade or incidence. There was also no correlation between endplate-implant width and length mismatch and subsidence grade or incidence. However, there was a strong correlation between the usage of the 18-mm-wide implants and the development of higher-grade subsidence (p = 0.002) necessitating surgery. There was no significant association between the degree of mismatch or Marchi subsidence grade and the presence of postoperative radiculopathy. Of the 8 patients with 18-mm implants demonstrating radiographic subsidence, 5 (62.5%) required reoperation. Of the 22 patients with 22-mm implants demonstrating radiographic subsidence, 13 (59.1%) required reoperation.
There was no correlation between endplate-implant area, width, or length mismatch and Marchi subsidence grade for stand-alone LLIF. There was also no correlation between either endplate-implant mismatch or Marchi subsidence grade and postoperative radiculopathy. The data do suggest that the use of 18-mm-wide implants in stand-alone LLIF may increase the risk of developing high-grade subsidence necessitating reoperation compared to the use of 22-mm-wide implants.
Correspondence D. Kojo Hamilton: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. email@example.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 6, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.1.SPINE19776.Disclosures Dr. Tempel reports being a consultant for NuVasive. Dr. Okonkwo reports being a consultant for NuVasive and Zimmer Biomet; he owns stock in Stryker. Dr. Kanter reports being a consultant for NuVasive; he receives royalties from Zimmer Biomet. Dr. Agarwal reports receiving royalties from Thieme Medical Publishers.
TempelZJGandhokeGSOkonkwoDOKanterAS: Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J24 (Suppl 3):414–4192015
TempelZJ, GandhokeGS, OkonkwoDO, KanterAS: Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. 24 (Suppl 3):414–419, 2015)| false
TempelZJMcDowellMMPanczykowskiDMGandhokeGSHamiltonDKOkonkwoDO: Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine28:50–562018
TempelZJ, McDowellMM, PanczykowskiDM, GandhokeGS, HamiltonDK, OkonkwoDO, : Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion. 28:50–56, 2018)| false