Letter to the Editor. Incorrect analysis of motor evoked potential efficacy for pedicle subtraction osteotomy

Restricted access
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Jeremy A. Lieberman: jeremy.lieberman@ucsf.edu.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 10, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.SPINE19909.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Lau DDalle Ore CLReid P Utility of neuromonitoring during lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(3):397407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Langeloo DDJournée HLde Kleuver MGrotenhuis JA. Criteria for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal deformity surgery A review and discussion of the literature. Neurophysiol Clin. 2007;37(6):431439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Lieberman JLyon RFeiner J The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(13):E414E424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Yoshida GUshirozako HKobayashi S Intraoperative neuromonitoring during adult spinal deformity surgery: alert-positive cases for various surgical procedures. Spine Deform. 2019;7(1):132140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Lyon RGibson ABurch SLieberman J. Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24(6):441448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Lyon RBurch SLieberman J. Mixed-muscle electrode placement (“jumping” muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23(6):403408.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Tamkus ARice KMcCaffrey M. Perils of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: analysis of “false-negative” results in spine surgeries. Spine J. 2018;18(2):276284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Guo LLi YHan RGelb AW. The correlation between recordable MEPs and motor function during spinal surgery for resection of thoracic spinal cord tumor. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018;30(1):3943.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Bhalodia VSchwartz DSestokas A Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(4):395402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Tamkus ARice KKim H. Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries. Spine J. 2014;14(8):14401446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1

    Lieberman JALyon RFeiner J The efficacy of motor evoked potentials in fixed sagittal imbalance deformity correction surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(13):E414E424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Tamkus AARice KSMcCaffrey MT. Perils of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: analysis of “false-negative” results in spine surgeries. Spine J. 2018;18(2):276284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Griner PFMayewski RJMushlin AIGreenland P. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94(Pt 2):557592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Yoshida GUshirozako HKobayashi S Intraoperative neuromonitoring during adult spinal deformity surgery: alert-positive cases for various surgical procedures. Spine Deform. 2019;7(1):132140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Kamerlink JRErrico TXavier S Major intraoperative neurologic monitoring deficits in consecutive pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients at one institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(2):240245.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Thirumala PDBodily LTint D Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during instrumented scoliosis corrective procedures: validity revisited. Spine J. 2014;14(8):15721580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Thirumala PDHuang JThiagarajan K Diagnostic accuracy of combined multimodality somatosensory evoked potential and transcranial motor evoked potential intraoperative monitoring in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(19):E1177E1184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 75 75 75
Full Text Views 8 8 8
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar