The case for T2 pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the surgical treatment of rigid cervicothoracic deformity

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Rigid cervicothoracic kyphotic deformity (CTKD) remains a difficult pathology to treat, especially in the setting of prior cervical instrumentation and fusion. CTKD may result in chronic neck pain, difficulty maintaining horizontal gaze, and myelopathy. Prior studies have advocated for the use of C7 or T1 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs). However, these surgeries are fraught with danger and, most significantly, place the C7, C8, and/or T1 nerve roots at risk.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with performing T2 PSO for the correction of rigid CTKD. Demographics collected included age, sex, details of prior cervical surgery, and coexisting conditions. Perioperative variables included levels decompressed, levels instrumented, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, length of stay, complications from surgery, and length of follow-up. Radiographic measurements included C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction, and changes in the cervicothoracic Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, and C2–S1 SVA.

RESULTS

Four male patients were identified (age range 55–72 years). Three patients had undergone prior posterior cervical laminectomy and instrumented fusion and developed postsurgical kyphosis. All patients underwent T2 PSO: 2 patients received instrumentation at C2–T4, and 2 patients received instrumentation at C2–T5. The median C2–7 SVA correction was 3.85 cm (range 2.9–5.3 cm). The sagittal Cobb angle correction ranged from 27.8° to 37.6°. Notably, there were no neurological complications.

CONCLUSIONS

T2 PSO is a powerful correction technique for the treatment of rigid CTKD. Compared with C7 or T1 PSO, there is decreased risk of injury to intrinsic hand muscle innervators, and there is virtually no risk of vertebral artery injury. Laminectomy may also be safer, as there is less (or no) scar tissue from prior surgeries. Correction at this distal level may allow for a greater sagittal correction. The authors are optimistic that these findings will be corroborated in larger cohorts examining this challenging clinical entity.

ABBREVIATIONS AS = ankylosing spondylitis; CTKD = cervicothoracic kyphotic deformity; PSO = pedicle subtraction osteotomy; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; VA = vertebral artery.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Yakov Gologorsky: Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY. yakov.gologorsky@gmail.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online October 25, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.7.SPINE19350.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Bruneau MCornelius JFMarneffe VTriffaux MGeorge B: Anatomical variations of the V2 segment of the vertebral artery. Neurosurgery 59 (1 Suppl 1):ONS20ONS242006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cacho-Rodrigues PCampana MObeid IVital JMGille O: Sagittal correction and reciprocal changes after thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:E791E7972016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Cavdar SArisan E: Variations in the extracranial origin of the human vertebral artery. Acta Anat (Basel) 135:2362381989

  • 4

    Cecchinato RBerjano PBassani RLamartina C: Osteotomies in proximal junctional kyphosis in the cervicothoracic area. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 1):S31S372015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Deviren VScheer JKAmes CP: Technique of cervicothoracic junction pedicle subtraction osteotomy for cervical sagittal imbalance: report of 11 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 15:1741812011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Ghobrial GMLebwohl NHGreen BAGjolaj JP: Multilevel Schwab grade II osteotomies for sagittal plane correction in the management of adult spinal deformity. Spine J 17:159416002017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Hong JTPark DKLee MJKim SWAn HS: Anatomical variations of the vertebral artery segment in the lower cervical spine: analysis by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:242224262008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Johnston TLKaraikovic EELautenschlager EPMarcu D: Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Spine J 6:6676722006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Jones ELHeller JGSilcox DHHutton WC: Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:9779821997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kennamer BTArginteanu MSMoore FMSteinberger AAYao KCGologorsky Y: Complications of poor cervical alignment in patients undergoing posterior cervicothoracic laminectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg 122:e408e4142019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Koo KHYoon STKim SBHutton WC: The effect of hubbing on the pull-out strength of lateral mass screws in the cervical spine: a biomechanical experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E45E482015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Lafage VAmes CSchwab FKlineberg EAkbarnia BSmith J: Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E180E1872012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Langeloo DDJournee HLPavlov PWde Kleuver M: Cervical osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of new developments. Eur Spine J 15:4935002006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Lee JSYoun MSShin JKGoh TSKang SS: Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 24:119912032015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    McMaster MJ: Osteotomy of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:1972031997

  • 16

    Obeid IDiebo BGBoissiere LBourghli ACawley DTLarrieu D: Single level proximal thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed hyperkyphotic deformity: surgical technique and patient series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 14:5155232018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    O’Shaughnessy BAKuklo TRHsieh PCYang BPKoski TROndra SL: Thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:289328992009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Passias PGHorn SRJalai CMRamchandran SPoorman GWKim HJ: Cervical alignment changes in patients developing proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical correction of adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 83:6756822018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Post NNaziri QCooper CSPivec RPaulino CB: Pedicle reduction osteotomy in the upper cervical spine: technique, case report and review of the literature. Int J Spine Surg 9:572015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Protopsaltis TSScheer JKTerran JSSmith JSHamilton DKKim HJ: How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 23:1531582015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Sadeh MDabby R: Apparent C8-T1 radiculopathy with hand weakness due to mid-cervical spondylosis. J Clin Neurosci 47:1111152018

  • 22

    Shin JHYanamadala VCha TD: Computer-assisted navigation for real time planning of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in cervico-thoracic deformity correction. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 16:4454502019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Simmons EH: Kyphotic deformity of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (128):65771977

  • 24

    Tang JAScheer JKSmith JSDeviren VBess SHart RA: The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 76 (Suppl 1):S14S212015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Tobin MKBirk DMRangwala SDSiemionow KSchizas CNeckrysh S: T-1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of rigid cervical kyphotic deformity: report of 4 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 27:4874932017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Wakao NTakeuchi MKamiya MAoyama MHirasawa ASato K: Variance of cervical vertebral artery measured by CT angiography and its influence on C7 pedicle anatomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:2282322014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Wollowick ALKelly MPRiew KD: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E342E3482012

TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 469 469 469
Full Text Views 62 62 62
PDF Downloads 46 46 46
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar