Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an accepted motion-sparing technique associated with favorable patient outcomes. However, heterotopic ossification (HO) and adjacent-segment degeneration are poorly understood adverse events that can be observed after CDA. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine 1) the effect of the residual exposed endplate (REE) on HO, and 2) identify risk factors predicting radiographic adjacent-segment disease (rASD) in a consecutive cohort of CDA patients.
A retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent 1- or 2-level CDA at the University of Calgary between 2002 and 2015 with > 1-year follow-up. REE was calculated by subtracting the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the arthroplasty device from the native AP endplate diameter measured on lateral radiographs. HO was graded using the McAfee classification (low grade, 0–2; high grade, 3 and 4). Change in AP endplate diameter over time was measured at the index and adjacent levels to indicate progressive rASD.
Forty-five patients (58 levels) underwent CDA during the study period. The mean age was 46 years (SD 10 years). Twenty-six patients (58%) were male. The median follow-up was 29 months (IQR 42 months). Thirty-three patients (73%) underwent 1-level CDA. High-grade HO developed at 19 levels (33%). The mean REE was 2.4 mm in the high-grade HO group and 1.6 mm in the low-grade HO group (p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, patients with REE > 2 mm had a 4.5-times-higher odds of developing high-grade HO (p = 0.02) than patients with REE ≤ 2 mm. No significant relationship was observed between the type of artificial disc and the development of high-grade HO (p = 0.1). RASD was more likely to develop in the lower cervical spine (p = 0.001) and increased with time (p < 0.001). The presence of an artificial disc was highly protective against degenerative changes at the index level of operation (p < 0.001) but did not influence degeneration in the adjacent segments.
In patients undergoing CDA, high-grade HO was predicted by REE. Therefore, maximizing the implant-endplate interface may help to reduce high-grade HO and preserve motion. RASD increases in an obligatory manner following CDA and is highly linked to specific levels (e.g., C6–7) rather than the presence or absence of an adjacent arthroplasty device. The presence of an artificial disc is, however, protective against further degenerative change at the index level of operation.
ABBREVIATIONSACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; AP = anteroposterior; ASD = adjacent-segment disease; CDA = cervical disc arthroplasty; HO = heterotopic ossification; NSAID = nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; rASD = radiographic ASD; REE = residual exposed endplate; ROM = range of motion.
Correspondence R. John Hurlbert: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. firstname.lastname@example.org.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 2, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.SPINE19257.Disclosures Dr. Jacobs: consultant for Medtronic and Stryker.
HilibrandAS, CarlsonGD, PalumboMA, JonesPK, BohlmanHH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. 81:519–528, 19991022579710.2106/00004623-199904000-00009)| false
HiseyMSZiglerJEJacksonRNunleyPDBaeHWKimKD: Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg10:102016
LeeJH, JungTG, KimHS, JangJS, LeeSH: Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement. 10:676–682, 201010.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.017)| false
MeiselHJJurákLAntinheimoJArreguiRBruchmannBČabrajaM: Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome. J Neurosurg Spine25:556–5652016
MeiselHJ, JurákL, AntinheimoJ, ArreguiR, BruchmannB, ČabrajaM, : Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome. 25:556–565, 201610.3171/2016.3.SPINE15810)| false
NoriegaDC, RamajoRH, Sánchez-LiteI, ToribioB, DelenE, SahinS: Heterotopic ossification in cervical disk surgery is still a problem. What are the key factors for a solution?96:585–590, 201610.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.078)| false
NunleyPDJawaharACavanaughDAGordonCRKerrEJIIIUtterPA: Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria. Spine J13:5–122013
NunleyPD, JawaharA, CavanaughDA, GordonCR, KerrEJIII, UtterPA: Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria. 13:5–12, 20132331810810.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.032)| false
NunleyPDJawaharAKerrEJIIIGordonCJCavanaughDABirdsongEM: Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)37:445–4512012
NunleyPD, JawaharA, KerrEJIII, GordonCJ, CavanaughDA, BirdsongEM, : Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. 37:445–451, 201210.1097/BRS.0b013e31822174b321587111)| false
PeduzziP, ConcatoJ, KemperE, HolfordTR, FeinsteinAR: A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. 49:1373–1379, 199610.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-38970487)| false
RyuKSParkCKJunSCHuhHY: Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices. J Neurosurg Spine13:299–3072010
RyuKS, ParkCK, JunSC, HuhHY: Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices. 13:299–307, 20102080972110.3171/2010.3.SPINE09445)| false
WuTKWangBYDengMDHongYRongXChenH: A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore)96:e81122017
WuTK, WangBY, DengMD, HongY, RongX, ChenH, : A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a retrospective study. 96:e8112, 201710.1097/MD.000000000000811229019878)| false
XuS, LiangY, ZhuZ, QianY, LiuH: Adjacent segment degeneration or disease after cervical total disc replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 13:244, 20183028580710.1186/s13018-018-0940-9)| false