Upper instrumented vertebra to the right of the lowest instrumented vertebra as a predictor of an increase in the main thoracic curve after selective posterior fusion for the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: multicenter study on the relationship between fusion area and surgical outcome
Unfused main thoracic (MT) curvatures occasionally increase after selective thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion. This study sought to identify the predictors of an unacceptable increase in MT curve (UIMT) after selective posterior fusion (SPF) of the TL/L curve in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Forty-eight consecutive patients (44 females and 4 males, mean age 15.7 ± 2.5 years, range 13–24 years) with Lenke type 5C AIS who underwent SPF of the TL/L curve were analyzed. The novel “Shinshu line” (S-line) was defined as a line connecting the centers of the concave-side pedicles of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) on preoperative radiographs. The authors established an S-line tilt to the right as S-line positive (S-line+, i.e., the UIV being to the right of the LIV) and compared S-line+ and S-line− groups for thoracic apical vertebral translation (T-AVT) and MT Cobb angle preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at final follow-up. The predictors for T-AVT > 20 mm at final follow-up were evaluated as well. T-AVT > 20 mm was defined as a UIMT.
Among the 48 consecutively treated patients, 26 were S-line+ and 22 were S-line−. At preoperative, early postoperative, and final follow-up a minimum of 2 years later, the mean T-AVT was 12.8 mm (range −9.3 to 32.8 mm), 19.6 mm (range −13.0 to 41.0 mm), and 22.8 mm (range −1.9 to 68.7 mm) in the S-line+ group, and 10.8 mm (range −5.1 to 27.3 mm), 16.2 mm (range −11.7 to 42.1 mm), and 11.0 mm (range −6.3 to 26.9 mm) in the S-line− group, respectively. T-AVT in S-line+ patients was significantly larger than that in S-line− patients at the final follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed S-line+ (odds ratio [OR] 23.8, p = 0.003) and preoperative MT Cobb angle (OR 7.9, p = 0.001) to be predictors of a UIMT.
S-line+ was defined as the UIV being to the right of the LIV. T-AVT in the S-line+ group was significantly larger than in the S-line− group at the final follow-up. S-line+ status and larger preoperative MT Cobb angle were independent predictors of a UIMT after SPF for the TL/L curve in patients with Lenke type 5C AIS. Surgeons should consider changing the UIV and/or LIV in patients exhibiting S-line+ during preoperative planning to avoid a possible increase in MT curve and revision surgery.
ABBREVIATIONSAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; CSVL = central sacral vertical line; LEV = lower end vertebra; LIV = lowest instrumented vertebra; MT = main thoracic; OR = odds ratio; PA = posteroanterior; PT = proximal thoracic; S-line = Shinshu line; S-line+ = S-line positive tilt; S-line− = S-line negative tilt; SPF = selective posterior fusion; SRS = Scoliosis Research Society; T-AVT = thoracic apical vertebral translation; TK = thoracic kyphosis; TL/L = thoracolumbar/lumbar; UEV = upper end vertebra; UIMT = unacceptable increase in MT curve; UIV = upper instrumented vertebra.
Correspondence Jun Takahashi: Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan. firstname.lastname@example.org.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 23, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.5.SPINE181469.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
AndoK, ImagamaS, ItoZ, KobayashiK, HidaT, ItoK, : Predictive factors for a distal adjacent disorder with L3 as the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5C patients. 26:59–66, 201610.1007/s00590-015-1712-426487545)| false
CochranT, IrstamL, NachemsonA: Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. 8:576–584, 1983622801610.1097/00007632-198309000-00003)| false
EnercanMKahramanSYilarSCobanogluMGokcenBHKaraderelerS: does it make a difference to stop fusion at L3 versus L4 in terms of disc and facet joint degeneration: an MRI study with minimum 5 years follow-up. Spine Deform4:237–2442016
EnercanM, KahramanS, YilarS, CobanogluM, GokcenBH, KaraderelerS, : does it make a difference to stop fusion at L3 versus L4 in terms of disc and facet joint degeneration: an MRI study with minimum 5 years follow-up. 4:237–244, 20162792750910.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.001)| false
FabricantPDAdmoniSGreenDWIppLSWidmannRF: Return to athletic activity after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: analysis of independent predictors. J Pediatr Orthop32:259–2652012
HeleniusI, RemesV, LambergT, SchlenzkaD, PoussaM: Long-term health-related quality of life after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. 90:1231–1239, 200810.2106/JBJS.G.0011418519315)| false
HuitemaGCJansenRCvan OoijAPuntIMvan RhijnLW: Predictability of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after anterior thoracolumbar correction and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A retrospective study on a consecutive series of 29 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Spine J15:966–9702015
HuitemaGC, JansenRC, van OoijA, PuntIM, van RhijnLW: Predictability of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after anterior thoracolumbar correction and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A retrospective study on a consecutive series of 29 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. 15:966–970, 201510.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.01323958296)| false
LeeCS, HaJK, HwangCJ, LeeDH, KimTH, ChoJH: Is it enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves?25:3256–3264, 201610.1007/s00586-015-4373-426763009)| false
LiMFangXSunYWangXWangLLiuH: Thoracic curve correction after posterior fusion and instrumentation of structural lumbar curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg131:1375–13812011
LiuZGuoJZhuZQianBSunXXuL: Role of the upper and lowest instrumented vertebrae in predicting the postoperative coronal balance in Lenke 5C patients after selective posterior fusion. Eur Spine J22:2392–23982013
LiuZ, GuoJ, ZhuZ, QianB, SunX, XuL, : Role of the upper and lowest instrumented vertebrae in predicting the postoperative coronal balance in Lenke 5C patients after selective posterior fusion. 22:2392–2398, 20132370893810.1007/s00586-013-2808-3)| false
LuoM, WangW, ShenM, XiaL: Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of fusion segments and radiological outcomes. 11:77, 201610.1186/s13018-016-0415-927401875)| false
SenkoyluALukKDWongYWCheungKM: Prognosis of spontaneous thoracic curve correction after the selective anterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar (Lenke 5C) curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J14:1117–11242014
SudoHKanedaKShonoYIwasakiN: Selection of the upper vertebra to be instrumented in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by anterior correction and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation: a minimum 12-year follow-up study. Spine J16:281–2872016
SudoH, KanedaK, ShonoY, IwasakiN: Selection of the upper vertebra to be instrumented in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by anterior correction and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation: a minimum 12-year follow-up study. 16:281–287, 20162629139910.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.021)| false
WangFXuXMWeiXZZhuXDLiM: Spontaneous thoracic curve correction after selective posterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medicine (Baltimore)94:e11552015
ZhangYLinGWangSZhangJShenJWangY: Higher flexibility and better immediate spontaneous correction may not gain better results for nonstructural thoracic curve in Lenke 5C AIS patients: risk factors for its correction loss. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)41:1731–17392016
ZhangY, LinG, WangS, ZhangJ, ShenJ, WangY, : Higher flexibility and better immediate spontaneous correction may not gain better results for nonstructural thoracic curve in Lenke 5C AIS patients: risk factors for its correction loss. 41:1731–1739, 20162783198910.1097/BRS.0000000000001760)| false