Adjacent-segment disease following two-level axial lumbar interbody fusion

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

While long-term studies have evaluated adjacent-segment disease (ASD) following posterior lumbar spine arthrodesis, no such studies have assessed the incidence and prevalence of ASD following axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF). The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of ASD following AxiaLIF.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 149 patients who underwent two-level index AxiaLIF and had at least 2 years of radiographic and clinical follow-up. ASD and pre- and postoperative lumbar lordosis were evaluated in each patient. ASD was defined as both radiographic and clinically significant disease at a level adjacent to a previous fusion requiring surgical intervention. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.01 years.

RESULTS

Twenty (13.4%) of the 149 patients developed ASD during the data collection period. Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted a disease-free ASD survival rate of 95.3% (95% CI 90.4%–97.7%) at 2 years and 89.1% (95% CI 82.8%–93.2%) at 5 years for two-level fusion. A laminectomy adjacent to a fusion site was associated with 5.1 times the relative risk of developing ASD. Furthermore, the ASD group had significantly greater loss of lordosis than the no-ASD group (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Following two-level AxiaLIF, the rate of symptomatic ASD warranting either decompression or arthrodesis was found to be 4.7% at 2 years and 10.9% at 5 years. Adjacent-segment decompression and postoperative loss of lumbar lordosis predicted future development of ASD. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the largest reported cohort of patients to undergo two-level AxiaLIF in the United States.

ABBREVIATIONS ASD = adjacent-segment disease; AxiaLIF = axial lumbar interbody fusion.

Article Information

Correspondence Alex P. Michael: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL. amichael@siumed.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online April 19, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.2.SPINE18929.

A.P.M. and M.W.W. contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Flowchart demonstrating patient selection criteria for inclusion in survival analysis.

  • View in gallery

    Flowchart demonstrating patient selection criteria for inclusion in radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis.

  • View in gallery

    Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves showing the predicted percentage of patients remaining disease free (without reoperation). Shaded areas represent the 95% CIs. Censored patients are denoted by crosses. Survivorship curve representing time until adjacent-level reoperation is denoted with red shading, while time until first reoperation (either index or adjacent) is denoted with blue shading. Figure is available in color online only.

References

  • 1

    Akamaru TKawahara NTim Yoon SMinamide ASu Kim KTomita K: Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:156015662003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Alentado VJLubelski DHealy ATOrr RDSteinmetz MPBenzel EC: Predisposing characteristics of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:116711722016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Aryan HENewman CBGold JJAcosta FL JrCoover CAmes CP: Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:2252302008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bydon MMacki MKerezoudis PSciubba DMWolinsky JPWitham TF: The incidence of adjacent segment disease after lumbar discectomy: a study of 751 patients. J Clin Neurosci 35:42462017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Djurasovic MOCarreon LYGlassman SDDimar JR IIPuno RMJohnson JR: Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: a case-control study. Orthopedics 31:5462008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Ekman PMöller HHedlund R: Predictive factors for the outcome of fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:120412102009

  • 7

    Erkan SWu CMehbod AAHsu BPahl DWTransfeldt EE: Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 18:8078142009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Ghiselli GWang JCBhatia NNHsu WKDawson EG: Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:149715032004

  • 9

    Ghogawala ZBenzel ECAmin-Hanjani SBarker FG IIHarrington JFMagge SN: Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 1:2672722004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gillet P: The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:3383452003

  • 11

    Gundanna MIMiller LEBlock JE: Complications with axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion: a 5-year postmarketing surveillance experience. SAS J 5:90942011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hilibrand ASRobbins M: Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):190S194S2004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hofstetter CPShin BTsiouris AJElowitz EHärtl R: Radiographic and clinical outcome after 1- and 2-level transsacral axial interbody fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:4544632013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kumar MNJacquot FHall H: Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10:3093132001

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Lee JCLee SHPeters CRiew KD: Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E571E5772015

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Lehmann TRSpratt KFTozzi JEWeinstein JNReinarz SJel-Khoury GY: Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:971041987

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lindley EMMcCullough MABurger ELBrown CWPatel VV: Complications of axial lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 15:2732792011

  • 18

    Luther NTomasino AParikh KHärtl R: Neuronavigation in the minimally invasive presacral approach for lumbosacral fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52:1962002009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Marchi LOliveira LCoutinho EPimenta L: Results and complications after 2-level axial lumbar interbody fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 17:1871922012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Marotta NCosar MPimenta LKhoo LT: A novel minimally invasive presacral approach and instrumentation technique for anterior L5-S1 intervertebral discectomy and fusion: technical description and case presentations. Neurosurg Focus 20(1):E92006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Maysumoto TO: Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 26:4354402017

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Miyakoshi NAbe EShimada YOkuyama KSuzuki TSato K: Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:183718422000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Oda ICunningham BWBuckley RAGoebel MJHaggerty CJOrbegoso CM: Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:213921461999

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Patel RDGraziano GPVanderhave KLPatel AAGerling MC: Facet violation with the placement of percutaneous pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1749E17522011

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Penta MSandhu AFraser RD: Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:7437471995

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Radcliff KEKepler CKJakoi ASidhu GSRihn JVaccaro AR: Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J 13:133913492013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Schlegel JDSmith JASchleusener RL: Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:9709811996

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Sears WRSergides IGKazemi NSmith MWhite GJOsburg B: Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Spine J 11:11202011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Umehara SZindrick MRPatwardhan AGHavey RMVrbos LAKnight GW: The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:161716242000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Wai EKSantos ERMorcom RAFraser RD: Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:195219562006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Wang JZhou YZhang ZFLi CQZheng WJLiu J: Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19:178017842010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Watanabe KMatsumoto MIkegami TNishiwaki YTsuji TIshii K: Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 14:51582011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Wiltse LLRadecki SEBiel HMDiMartino PPOas RAFarjalla G: Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 12:27331999

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Xia XPChen HLCheng HB: Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:5976082013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Yee TJTerman SWLa Marca FPark P: Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci 21:179618012014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 298 298 33
Full Text Views 49 49 9
PDF Downloads 35 35 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar