The method of artificial disc replacement (ADR) has been developed as an alternative treatment to fusion surgery after decompression for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) with radiculopathy. Preserving the motion of ADR devices aims to prevent immobilization side effects such as adjacent-segment pathology (ASP). However, long-term follow-up evaluations using MRI are needed to investigate if this intent is achieved.
The authors performed a randomized controlled trial with 153 patients (mean age 47 years) undergoing surgery for cervical radiculopathy. Eighty-three patients received an ADR and 70 patients underwent fusion surgery. Outcomes after 5 years were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score as the primary outcome; motion preservation and heterotopic ossification by radiography; ASP by MRI; and secondary surgical procedures.
Scores on the NDI were approximately halved in both groups: the mean score after 5 years was 36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 31–41) in the ADR group and 32 (95% CI 27–38) in the fusion group (p = 0.48). There were no other significant differences between the groups in six other patient-related outcome measures. Fifty-four percent of the patients in the ADR group preserved motion at the operated cervical level and 25% of the ADRs were spontaneously fused. Seventeen ADR patients (21%) and 7 fusion patients (10%) underwent secondary surgery (p = 0.11), with 5 patients in each group due to clinical ASP.
In patients with cervical DDD and radiculopathy decompression as well as ADR, surgery did not result in better clinical or radiological outcomes after 5 years compared with decompression and fusion surgery.
Correspondence Anna MacDowall: Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. email@example.com.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 11, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18659.
Disclosures DePuy Synthes Spine provided an unrestricted grant for this study. Dr. MacDowall reports being on the board of the Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons. Dr. Skeppholm reports being a paid speaker for DePuy Synthes Spine. Dr. Robinson reports being on the speaker’s bureau and/or giving paid presentations for AOSpine, DePuy Synthes Spine, and Medtronic; and being on the board of the Cervical Spine Research Society (European Section) and AOSpine. Dr. Löfgren reports giving paid lectures for DePuy Synthes Spine. Dr. Olerud reports being on the speaker’s bureau for Anatomica, AOSpine, DePuy Synthes, and Medtronic; receiving clinical or research support for the study from Depuy Synthes; and being on the board of the Cervical Spine Research Society (European Section).
AnHSSimpsonJMGloverJMStephanyJ: Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)20:2211–22161995
BurkusJKHaidRWJrTraynelisVCMummaneniPV: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine13:308–3182010
CarreonLYGlassmanSDCampbellMJAndersonPA: Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J10:469–4742010
HackerFMBabcockRMHackerRJ: Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)38:2223–22262013
LöfgrenHJohannssonVOlssonTRydLLevanderB: Rigid fusion after Cloward operation for cervical disc disease using autograft, allograft, or xenograft: a randomized study with radiostereometric and clinical follow-up assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)25:1908–19162000
MacDowallASkeppholmMLindhagenLRobinsonYOlerudC: Effects of preoperative mental distress versus surgical modality, arthroplasty, or fusion on long-term outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine29:371–3792018
MurreyDJanssenMDelamarterRGoldsteinJZiglerJTayB: Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J9:275–2862009
NesterenkoSORileyLHIIISkolaskyRL: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)37:1470–14742012
NunleyPDJawaharACavanaughDAGordonCRKerrEJIIIUtterPA: Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria. Spine J13:5–122013
ParkerSLGodilSSShauDNMendenhallSKMcGirtMJ: Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine18:154–1602013
PhillipsFMGeislerFHGilderKMReahCHowellKMMcAfeePC: Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)40:674–6832015
PoolJJOsteloRWHovingJLBouterLMde VetHC: Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)32:3047–30512007
SassoRCAndersonPARiewKDHellerJG: Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am93:1684–16922011
SkeppholmMIngebroCEngströmTOlerudC: The Dysphagia Short Questionnaire: an instrument for evaluation of dysphagia: a validation study with 12 months’ follow-up after anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)37:996–10022012
SkeppholmMLindgrenLHenriquesTVavruchLLöfgrenHOlerudC: The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy—a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine J15:1284–12942015
SuchomelPBarsaPBuchvaldPSvobodnikAVanickovaE: Autologous versus allogenic bone grafts in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study with respect to bone union pattern. Eur Spine J13:510–5152004
WalraevensJLiuBMeersschaertJDemaerelPDelyeHDepreitereB: Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints. Eur Spine J18:358–3692009(Erratum in Eur Spine J 18:370 2009)
YoungIAClelandJAMichenerLABrownC: Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil89:831–8392010