The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for grading motor function in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).
Two neurosurgical residents and 2 faculty members performed motor examinations in 6 chronic incomplete SCI patients for a total of 156 muscle groups. Examinations were performed using the modified MRC grading scale during routine clinic visits for each patient. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. Patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grade A (ASIA A) injuries were excluded. Inter-rater reliability coefficients were calculated using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Sixty-four percent of the tested variables demonstrated extremely strong (W 0.71–0.9) or strong (0.51–0.7) inter-rater reliability using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance and an ICC corresponding to excellent (ICC > 0.75) or fair to good (ICC 0.4–0.75) inter-rater reliability. An additional 7% showed poor inter-rater reliability (ICC < 0.4). The remaining variables tested did not reach statistical significance.
The inter-rater reliability of the modified MRC scale was found to be high in the majority of tested variables, but the results suggest that discrepancy among trained observers does exist. Reliability was greatest in the lower-extremity muscle groups and least in the upper-extremity muscle groups in patients with chronic incomplete SCI.
ABBREVIATIONSASIA = American Spinal Injury Association; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; ISNCSCI = International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury; MRC = Medical Research Council; SCI = spinal cord injury.
FawcettJWCurtASteevesJDColemanWPTuszynskiMHLammertseD: Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord45:190–2052007
HalesMBirosEReznikJE: Reliability and validity of the Sensory Component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): a systematic review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil21:241–2492015
MarinoRJJonesLKirshblumSTalJDasguptaA: Reliability and repeatability of the motor and sensory examination of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med31:166–1702008
Paternostro-SlugaTGrim-StiegerMPoschMSchuhfriedOVacariuGMittermaierC: Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med40:665–6712008
PostBMerkusMPde BieRMAde HaanRJSpeelmanJD: Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale motor examination: are ratings of nurses, residents in neurology, and movement disorders specialists interchangeable?Mov Disord20:1577–15842005
PriebeMMWaringWP: The interobserver reliability of the revised American Spinal Injury Association standards for neurological classification of spinal injury patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil70:268–2701991
TesterNJLorenzDJSuterSPBuehnerJJFalangaDWatsonE: Responsiveness of the neuromuscular recovery scale during outpatient activity-dependent rehabilitation for spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair30:528–5382016