Augmented reality (AR) is a novel technology that has the potential to increase the technical feasibility, accuracy, and safety of conventional manual and robotic computer-navigated pedicle insertion methods. Visual data are directly projected to the operator’s retina and overlaid onto the surgical field, thereby removing the requirement to shift attention to a remote display. The objective of this study was to assess the comparative accuracy of AR-assisted pedicle screw insertion in comparison to conventional pedicle screw insertion methods.
Five cadaveric male torsos were instrumented bilaterally from T6 to L5 for a total of 120 inserted pedicle screws. Postprocedural CT scans were obtained, and screw insertion accuracy was graded by 2 independent neuroradiologists using both the Gertzbein scale (GS) and a combination of that scale and the Heary classification, referred to in this paper as the Heary-Gertzbein scale (HGS). Non-inferiority analysis was performed, comparing the accuracy to freehand, manual computer-navigated, and robotics-assisted computer-navigated insertion accuracy rates reported in the literature. User experience analysis was conducted via a user experience questionnaire filled out by operators after the procedures.
The overall screw placement accuracy achieved with the AR system was 96.7% based on the HGS and 94.6% based on the GS. Insertion accuracy was non-inferior to accuracy reported for manual computer-navigated pedicle insertion based on both the GS and the HGS scores. When compared to accuracy reported for robotics-assisted computer-navigated insertion, accuracy achieved with the AR system was found to be non-inferior when assessed with the GS, but superior when assessed with the HGS. Last, accuracy results achieved with the AR system were found to be superior to results obtained with freehand insertion based on both the HGS and the GS scores. Accuracy results were not found to be inferior in any comparison. User experience analysis yielded “excellent” usability classification.
AR-assisted pedicle screw insertion is a technically feasible and accurate insertion method.
ABBREVIATIONSAR-HMD = augmented reality head-mounted display; GS = Gertzbein scale; HGS = Heary-Gertzbein scale; LCL = lower control limit; LS = least squares; LSCL = lower 1-sided 95% confidence limit; NI = non-inferiority margin; PRC = percentage of reference control; UEQ = user experience questionnaire.
Correspondence Camilo A. Molina: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. email@example.com.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 29, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.12.SPINE181142.
Disclosures Augmedics Ltd. provided support to conduct cadaveric experiments including financial support for cadaveric sample procurement and provision of augmented reality head-mounted display hardware and software. K2M Inc. provided support by lending instruments and implants employed in this study.
Dr. Molina is a consultant for Augmedics Ltd. Dr. Theodore is an inventor of a device manufactured by Globus Medical Inc., which was used in the Discussion section. He is entitled to royalty payments on future sales of the device and he is a paid consultant to Globus Medical Inc. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. Dr. Mirovsky is a member of the Advisory Board for Augmedics Ltd. Dr. Harel received payment for clinical work from Augmedics Ltd. Dr. Witham receives support of a non–study-related clinical research effort that he oversees in a grant from Eli Lilly and Co. and from the Gordon and Marilyn Macklin Foundation. Dr. Sciubba is a consultant for Medtronic, K2M, Misonix, DePuy-Synthes, Stryker, NuVasive, and Baxter.
Elmi-TeranderANachabeRSkulasonHPedersenKSödermanMRacadioJ: Feasibility and accuracy of thoracolumbar minimally invasive pedicle screw placement with augmented reality navigation technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)43:1018–10232018
Elmi-TeranderASkulasonHSödermanMRacadioJHomanRBabicD: Surgical navigation technology based on augmented reality and integrated 3D intraoperative imaging: a spine cadaveric feasibility and accuracy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)41:E1303–E13112016
FianiBQuadriSARamakrishnanVBermanBKhanYSiddiqiJ: Retrospective review on accuracy: a pilot study of robotically guided thoracolumbar/sacral pedicle screws versus fluoroscopy-guided and computerized tomography stealth-guided screws. Cureus9:e14372017
FichtnerJHofmannNRienmüllerABuchmannNGemptJKirschkeJS: Revision rate of misplaced pedicle screws of the thoracolumbar spine-comparison of three-dimensional fluoroscopy navigation with freehand placement: a systematic analysis and review of the literature. World Neurosurg109:e24–e322018
FomekongESafiSERaftopoulosC: Spine navigation based on 3-dimensional robotic fluoroscopy for accurate percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a prospective study of 66 consecutive cases. World Neurosurg108:76–832017
LutherNIorgulescuJBGeannetteCGebhardHSalehTTsiourisAJ: Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws: screw accuracy, screw size, and the complexity of surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech28:E298–E3032015
NicholasKYeattsSDZhaoWCiolinoJBorgKDurkalskiV: The impact of covariate adjustment at randomization and analysis for binary outcomes: understanding differences between superiority and noninferiority trials. Stat Med34:1834–18402015
TakeshitaKMaruyamaTChikudaHShodaNSeichiAOnoT: Diameter, length, and direction of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine: analysis by multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)34:798–8032009
van DijkJDvan den EndeRPStramigioliSKöchlingMHössN: Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)40:E986–E9912015