Object. The authors undertook a study to assess the value of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in which carbon fiber cages (CFCs) were placed in patients undergoing revision disc surgery for symptoms suggesting neural compression with low-back pain.
Methods. The authors followed their first 50 patients for a maximum of 5 years and a minimum of 6 months after implantation of the CFCs. Patients in whom magnetic resonance (MR) imaging demonstrated “simple” recurrent herniation did not undergo PLIF. Surgery was performed in patients with symptoms of neural root compression, tension signs, and back pain with focal disc degeneration and nerve root distortion depicted on MR imaging compatible with clinical signs and symptoms. In 40 patients (80%) pedicle screws were not used. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Prolo Functional Economic Outcome Rating scale. Fusion outcome was assessed using an established classification.
Symptoms in 46 patients (92%) improved after surgery, and given their outcomes, 45 (90%) would have undergone the same surgery again. Two thirds of patients experienced good or excellent outcomes (Prolo score ≥ 8) at early and late follow up. There was no difference in clinical outcome between those in whom pedicle screws were and were not implanted (p = 0.83, Mann—Whitney U-test). The fusion rate at 2 years postsurgery was 95%. There were minimal complications, and no patients fared worse after surgery. No patient has undergone additional surgical treratment of the fused intervertebral space.
Conclusions. In this difficult group of patients the aim remains to improve symptoms but not cure the disease. A high fusion rate is possible when using the CFCs. Clinical success depends on selecting patients in whom radiological and clinical criteria accord. Pedicle screws are not necessary if facet joints are preserved, and high fusion rates and clinical success are possible without them.
AgazziSReverdinAMayD: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases.J Neurosurg (Spine 2)91:186–1921999Agazzi S Reverdin A May D: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 91:186–192 1999
BrantiganJWSteffeeAD: A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients.Spine14:2106–21171993Brantigan JW Steffee AD: A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 14:2106–2117 1993
FinneganWJFenlinJMMarvelJPet al: Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years.J Bone Joint Surg (Am)61:1077–10821979Finnegan WJ Fenlin JM Marvel JP et al: Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 61:1077–1082 1979
NorthRBCampbellJNJamesCSet al: Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operations.Neurosurgery28:685–6911991North RB Campbell JN James CS et al: Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operations. Neurosurgery 28:685–691 1991
ProloDJOklundSAButcherM: Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions.Spine11:601–6061986Prolo DJ Oklund SA Butcher M: Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 11:601–606 1986
WaddellGKummelEGLottoWNet al: Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries.J Bone Joint Surg (Am)61:201–2071979Waddell G Kummel EG Lotto WN et al: Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 61:201–207 1979