Anatomical projection of the cervical uncinate process in ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery and Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object. The cervical uncinate processes (UPs), their variations, and the relationships between the neurovascular structures and surrounding bone were investigated in this anatomical study. The object of this study was to highlight the important surgery-related considerations associated with ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery.

Methods. Forty-nine adult C3–7 dry bone samples were used, and 10 measurements were obtained for each vertebra. The anterior measurements involved the cervical uncinate process (UP): height, width, length, distance between its tip and vertebral foramina, interuncinate process distance, sagittal angle with the superior margin of the vertebral body (VB), VB anteroposterior diameter, and VB width. Posterior measurements involved the vertical distance between the superior border of the lamina at the lamina—facet joint and the tip of the UP, as well as the horizontal distance between the medial-most border of the superior facet and the tip of the UP. All symmetrical structures were measured bilaterally. There were no statistically significant differences between right- and left-sided measurements in this series.

The height of the UP increased gradually at each segmental level between C-3 and C-7. The width of the UP did not change with segmental level (5.0 mm at C-3 compared with 5.3 mm at C-7). On average, the length of the UP was relatively constant. The distance from the tip of the UP to vertebral foramina averaged 1 mm at the C2–3 level and 1.5 mm at the C5–6 level. Interuncinate distance and VB width gradually increased and were highly variable, which appeared to be related with osteophyte formation. There was a slight gradual increase from C-3 to lower segments, and it paralleled with the midline anteroposterior diameter of the same VB. The angle between the UP and the superior margin of the VB exhibited great variety. The posterior measurements decreased gradually from C-3 to C-7.

Conclusions. Based on the data obtained in this study, a surgeon is provided with a three-dimensional orientation as well as anatomical knowledge. This knowledge also allows for a more effective neurovascular decompression by minimizing the surgery-related complications.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address reprint requests to: Ayhan Attar, M.D., Ankara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Ibn-i Sina Hastenesi, Norosirurji Bolumu, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey. email: ayhanattar@hotmail.com.
  • 1.

    Clausen J, , Goel VK, & Traynelis VC, et al: Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: quantification using a finite element model of the C5–C6 segment. J Orthop Res 15:342347, 1997 Clausen J, Goel VK, Traynelis VC, et al: Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: quantification using a finite element model of the C5–C6 segment. J Orthop Res 15:342–347, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Cloward RB: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disc. J Neurosurg 15:602614, 1958 Cloward RB: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disc. J Neurosurg 15:602–614, 1958

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Cusick JF, , Yoganandan N, & Pintar F, et al: Biomechanics of cervical spine facetectomy and fixation techniques. Spine 13:808812, 1988 Cusick JF, Yoganandan N, Pintar F, et al: Biomechanics of cervical spine facetectomy and fixation techniques. Spine 13:808–812, 1988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Ebraheim NA, , Xu R, & Bhatti RA, et al: The projection of the cervical disc and uncinate process on the posterior aspect of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol 51:363367, 1999 Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Bhatti RA, et al: The projection of the cervical disc and uncinate process on the posterior aspect of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol 51:363–367, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Golfinos JG, , Dickman CA, & Zabramski JM, et al: Repair of vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical decompression. Spine 19:25522556, 1994 Golfinos JG, Dickman CA, Zabramski JM, et al: Repair of vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical decompression. Spine 19:2552–2556, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Hakuba A: Trans-unco-discal approach. A combined anterior and lateral approach to cervical discs. J Neurosurg 45:284291, 1976 Hakuba A: Trans-unco-discal approach. A combined anterior and lateral approach to cervical discs. J Neurosurg 45:284–291, 1976

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Henderson C, , Hennessy R, & Shuey H, et al: Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 13:504512, 1983 Henderson C, Hennessy R, Shuey H, et al: Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 13:504–512, 1983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Herkowitz HN, , Kurz LT, & Overholt DP: Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:10261030, 1990 Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP: Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:1026–1030, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Jho HD: Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg 84:155160, 1996 Jho HD: Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg 84:155–160, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Leosin F, , Biondi A, & Jomin M: Foraminal cervical herniated disc treated by anterior discoforaminotomy. Neurosurgery 21:334338, 1987 Leosin F, Biondi A, Jomin M: Foraminal cervical herniated disc treated by anterior discoforaminotomy. Neurosurgery 21:334–338, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Lu J, , Ebraheim NA, & Yang H, et al: Cervical uncinate process: an anatomic study for anterior decompression of the cervical spine. Surg Radiol Anat 20:249252, 1998 Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Yang H, et al: Cervical uncinate process: an anatomic study for anterior decompression of the cervical spine. Surg Radiol Anat 20:249–252, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Manabe S, , Tateishi A, & Ohno T: Anterolateral uncoforaminotomy for cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Acta Orthop Scand 59:669674, 1988 Manabe S, Tateishi A, Ohno T: Anterolateral uncoforaminotomy for cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Acta Orthop Scand 59:669–674, 1988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Mixter WJ, & Barr SJ: Rupture of intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210215, 1934 Mixter WJ, Barr SJ: Rupture of intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210–215, 1934

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Pait TG, , Killefer JA, & Arnautovic KI: Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery 39:769776, 1996 Pait TG, Killefer JA, Arnautovic KI: Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery 39:769–776, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Panjabi MM, , Duranceau J, & Goel V, et al: Cervical human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16:861869, 1991 Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, et al: Cervical human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16:861–869, 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Payne EE, & Spillane JD: The cervical spine: An anatomicopathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain 80:571597, 1957 Payne EE, Spillane JD: The cervical spine: An anatomicopathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain 80:571–597, 1957

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Rabinson RA, & Smith JW: Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion the cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96:223224, 1995 Rabinson RA, Smith JW: Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion the cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96:223–224, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Smith MD, , Emery SE, & Dudley A, et al: Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:410415, 1993 Smith MD, Emery SE, Dudley A, et al: Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 75:410–415, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Verbiest H: A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications. J Neurosurg 28:191203, 1968 Verbiest H: A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications. J Neurosurg 28:191–203, 1968

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Zdeblick TA, , Zou D, & Warden KE, et al: Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 74:2227, 1992 Zdeblick TA, Zou D, Warden KE, et al: Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 74:22–27, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 281 117 5
Full Text Views 120 8 1
PDF Downloads 122 9 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0