Wrong-sided and wrong-level neurosurgery: a national survey

Restricted access

Object

Perhaps the single greatest error that a surgeon hopes to avoid is operating at the wrong site. In this report, the authors describe the incidence and possible determinants of incorrect-site surgery (ICSS) among neurosurgeons.

Methods

The authors asked neurosurgeons to complete an anonymous survey. These surgeons were asked to report the number of craniotomies and lumbar and cervical discectomies performed during the previous year, as well as whether ICSS had occurred. They were also asked detailed questions regarding the potential determinants of ICSS.

Results

There was a 75% response rate and a 68% survey completion rate. Participating neurosurgeons performed 4695 lumbar and 2649 cervical discectomies, as well as 10,203 craniotomies. Based on this self-reporting, the incidence of wrong-level lumbar surgery was estimated to be 4.5 occurrences per 10,000 operations. The ICSSs per 10,000 cervical discectomies and craniotomies were 6.8 and 2.2, respectively. Neurosurgeons recognized fatigue, unusual time pressure, and emergent operations as factors contributing to ICSS. For spine surgery, in particular, unusual patient anatomy and a failure to verify the operative site by radiography were also commonly reported contributors.

Conclusions

Neurosurgical ICSSs do occur, but are rare events. Although there are significant limitations to the survey-based methodology, the data suggest that the prevention of such errors will require neurosurgeons to recognize risk factors and increase the use of intraoperative imaging.

Abbreviations used in this paper:ICSS = incorrect-site surgery; JCAHO = Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Neil Duggal, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C. Division of Neurosurgery, The University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Campus, Room A10–307, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5 Canada. email: Neil.Duggal@lhsc.on.ca.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Anonymous: Doctor who cut off wrong leg is defended by colleagues. New York Times September171995

  • 2

    Brennan TA: The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors—could it do harm?. N Engl J Med 342:112311252000

  • 3

    Gostin L: A public health approach to reducing error: medical malpractice as a barrier. JAMA 283:174217432000

  • 4

    Johnson P: Wrong site surgery in orthopedics: analysis of 15,987 cases at the orthopedic institute in Fargo. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: A follow-up review of wrong site surgery. Sentinel Event Alert Dec 5:132001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: Lessons learned: wrong site surgery. Sentinel Event Alert Aug 28:121998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Meinberg EGStern PJ: Incidence of wrong-site surgery among hand surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1931972003

  • 8

    Miller S: Two feet of mistakes. Medicine: how to police serious errors by doctors?. Newsweek March271995

  • 9

    Mohr JC: American medical malpractice litigation in historical perspective. JAMA 283:173117372000

  • 10

    Richard J: Identifying ways to reduce surgical errors. JAMA 275:351996

  • 11

    Stanley D: Amputee recovering after wrong leg taken. Tampa Tribune February282001

  • 12

    Sullivan P: Warning for surgeons: measure twice, cut once. CMAJ 168:10292003

TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 277 275 22
Full Text Views 99 76 5
PDF Downloads 125 73 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar