Understanding the role of pelvic obliquity and leg length discrepancy in adult spinal deformity patients with coronal malalignment: unlocking the black box

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center; and
  • | 2 The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $376.00
USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

This study had 3 objectives: 1) to describe pelvic obliquity (PO) and leg-length discrepancy (LLD) and their relationship with coronal malalignment (CM); 2) to report rates of isolated PO and PO secondary to LLD; and 3) to assess the importance of preoperative PO and LLD in postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery (≥ 6-level fusions) for adult spinal deformity at a single institution were reviewed. Variables evaluated were as follows: 1) PO, angle between the horizontal plane and a line touching bilateral iliac crests; and 2) LLD, distance from the head to the tibial plafond. Coronal vertical axis (CVA) and sagittal vertical axis measurements were collected, both from C7. The cutoff for CM was CVA > 3 cm. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was collected preoperatively and at 2 years.

RESULTS

Of 242 patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity, 90 (37.0%) had preoperative CM. Patients with preoperative CM had a higher PO (2.8° ± 3.2° vs 2.0° ± 1.7°, p = 0.013), a higher percentage of patients with PO > 3° (35.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0.044), and higher a percentage of patients with LLD > 1 cm (21.1% vs 9.8%, p = 0.014). Whereas preoperative PO was significantly positively correlated with CVA (r = 0.26, p < 0.001) and maximum Cobb angle (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), preoperative LLD was only significantly correlated with CVA (r = 0.14, p = 0.035). A total of 12.2% of patients with CM had significant PO and LLD, defined as follows: PO ≥ 3°; LLD ≥ 1 cm. Postoperatively, preoperative PO was significantly associated with both postoperative CM (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.40, p = 0.008) and postoperative CVA (β = 0.14, 95% CI 0.06–0.22, p < 0.001). A higher preoperative PO was independently associated with postoperative complications after multivariate logistic regression (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05–1.45, p = 0.010); however, 2-year ODI scores were not. Preoperative LLD had no significant relationship with postoperative CM, CVA, ODI, or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A PO ≥ 3° or LLD ≥ 1 cm was seen in 44.1% of patients with preoperative CM and in 23.5% of patients with normal coronal alignment. Preoperative PO was significantly associated with preoperative CVA and maximum Cobb angle, whereas preoperative LLD was only associated with preoperative CVA. The direction of PO and LLD showed no consistent pattern with CVA. Preoperative PO was independently associated with complications but not with 2-year ODI scores.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASD = adult spinal deformity; BMI = body mass index; CM = coronal malalignment; CVA = coronal vertical axis; C7PL = C7 plumb line; EBL = estimated blood loss; LLD = leg-length discrepancy; LSF = lumbosacral fractional; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PO = pelvic obliquity; PRO = patient-reported outcome; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; TIL = total instrumented levels; 3CO = 3-column osteotomy.

Illustration from Kong et al. (pp 4–12). Copyright Qing-Jie Kong. Used with permission.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $376.00
USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Bao H, Yan P, Qiu Y, Liu Z, Zhu F. Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(9):12271233.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Tanaka N, Ebata S, Oda K, Oba H, Haro H, Ohba T. Predictors and clinical importance of postoperative coronal malalignment after surgery to correct adult spinal deformity. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(7):E337E341.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Ploumis A, Simpson AK, Cha TD, Herzog JP, Wood KB. Coronal spinal balance in adult spine deformity patients with long spinal fusions: a minimum 2- to 5-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(9):341347.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Lewis SJ, Keshen SG, Kato S, Dear TE, Gazendam AM. Risk factors for postoperative coronal balance in adult spinal deformity surgery. Global Spine J. 2018;8(7):690697.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Bao H, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Sun X, Jiang J, Qian B, et al. Sequential correction technique to avoid postoperative global coronal decompensation in rigid adult spinal deformity: a technical note and preliminary results. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(9):21792186.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Plais N, Bao H, Lafage R, Gupta M, Smith JS, Shaffrey C, et al. The clinical impact of global coronal malalignment is underestimated in adult patients with thoracolumbar scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020;8(1):105113.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim YJ, Hung M, Cheh G, Koester LA. Does correction of preoperative coronal imbalance make a difference in outcomes of adult patients with deformity?. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976).2013;38(6):476483.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Negrini A, Vanossi M, Donzelli S, Zaina F, Romano M, Negrini S. Spinal coronal and sagittal balance in 584 healthy individuals during growth: normal plumb line values and their correlation with radiographic measurements. Phys Ther. 2019;99(12):17121718.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Lau D, Haddad AF, Deviren V, Ames CP. Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of concurrent sagittal-coronal imbalance in adult spinal deformity: a comparative analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(6):822829.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Chan AK, Lau D, Osorio JA, Yue JK, Berven SH, Burch S, et al. Asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity with coronal imbalance: complications, radiographic and surgical outcomes. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(2):209216.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Berjano P, Lamartina C. Classification of degenerative segment disease in adults with deformity of the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(9):18151824.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2005;30(6):682688.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Sheha ED, Steinhaus ME, Kim HJ, Cunningham ME, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Leg-length discrepancy, functional scoliosis, and low back pain. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(8):e6.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Winter RB, Pinto WC. Pelvic obliquity. Its causes and its treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1986;11(3):225234.

  • 15

    Chan CYW, Naing KS, Chiu CK, Mohamad SM, Kwan MK. Pelvic obliquity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis planned for posterior spinal fusion: a preoperative analysis of 311 lower limb axis films. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27(2):2309499019857250.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Radcliff KE, Orozco F, Molby N, Chen E, Sidhu GS, Vaccaro AR, Ong A. Is pelvic obliquity related to degenerative scoliosis?. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(3):171176.

  • 17

    O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, Lenke LG. Spinal Deformity Study Group: Radiographic Measurement Manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek; 2008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Banno T, Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, Yoshida G, Kobayashi S, Yasuda T, et al. Impact of pelvic obliquity on coronal alignment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020;8(6):12691278.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Hägglund G. Association between pelvic obliquity and scoliosis, hip displacement and asymmetric hip abduction in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional registry study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):464.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstück F, et al. Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(19):16611672.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Baum GR, Ha AS, Cerpa M, Zuckerman SL, Lin JD, Menger RP, et al. Does the Global Alignment and Proportion score overestimate mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity correction?. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;34(1):96102.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Assogba TF, Boulet S, Detrembleur C, Mahaudens P. The effects of real and artificial leg length discrepancy on mechanical work and energy cost during the gait. Gait Posture. 2018;59:147151.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007;32(24):27642770.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, Bess S, Bederman SS, Deviren V, et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(6):547564.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271273.

  • 26

    Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2000;25(22):29402952.

  • 27

    Crawford CH III, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Berven SH, Carreon LY. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(6):377381.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Kelly MP, Lurie JD, Yanik EL, Shaffrey CI, Baldus CR, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(4):338352.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Liu S, Diebo BG, Henry JK, Smith JS, Hostin R, Cunningham ME, et al. The benefit of nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: identifying predictors for reaching a minimal clinically important difference. Spine J. 2016;16(2):210218.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J. 2008;8(6):968974.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Yuksel S, Ayhan S, Nabiyev V, Domingo-Sabat M, Vila-Casademunt A, Obeid I, et al. Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?. Spine J. 2019;19(1):7178.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Jann B. Plotting regression coefficients and other estimates. Stata J. 2014;14(4):708737.

  • 33

    Maloney WJ, Rinsky LA, Gamble JG. Simultaneous correction of pelvic obliquity, frontal plane, and sagittal plane deformities in neuromuscular scoliosis using a unit rod with segmental sublaminar wires: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10(6):742749.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Shrader MW, Andrisevic EM, Belthur MV, White GR, Boan C, Wood W. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of pelvic obliquity measurement methods in patients with cerebral palsy. Spine Deform. 2018;6(3):257262.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Murray KJ, Molyneux T, Le Grande MR, Castro Mendez A, Fuss FK, Azari MF. Association of mild leg length discrepancy and degenerative changes in the hip joint and lumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(5):320329.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Morimoto T, Sonohata M, Kitajima M, Yoshihara T, Hirata H, Mawatari M. Hip-spine syndrome: the coronal alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis in patients with ankylosed hips. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;4(1):3742.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Yu Y, Song K, Wu B, Chi P, Liu J, Wang Z, Wang Y. Coronal compensation mechanism of pelvic obliquity in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Global Spine J. Published online May 5, 2021. doi:10.1177/21925682211010760

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 704 704 74
Full Text Views 180 180 63
PDF Downloads 218 218 70
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0