Long-term functional outcome of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and
  • | 3 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a major global cause of spinal cord dysfunction. Surgical treatment is considered a safe and effective way to improve functional outcome, although information about long-term functional outcome remains scarce despite increasing longevity. The objective of this study was to describe functional outcome 10 years after surgery for DCM.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study was undertaken in a university-affiliated neurosurgery department. All patients who underwent surgery for DCM between 2008 and 2010 as part of the multicenter Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy International trial were included. Participants were approached for additional virtual assessment 10 years after surgery. Functional outcome was assessed according to the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA; scores 0–18) score at baseline and 1, 2, and 10 years after surgery. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as 1-, 2-, or 3-point improvement for mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy, respectively. Outcome was considered durable when stabilization or improvement after 2 years was maintained at 10 years. Self-evaluated effect of surgery was assessed using a 4-point Likert-like scale. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were compared between groups that worsened and improved or remained stable using descriptive statistics. Functional outcome was compared between various time points during follow-up with linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Of the 42 originally included patients, 37 participated at follow-up (11.9% loss to follow-up, 100% response rate). The mean patient age was 56.1 years, and 42.9% of patients were female. Surgical approaches were anterior (76.2%), posterior (21.4%), or posterior with fusion (2.4%). The mean follow-up was 10.8 years (range 10–12 years). The mean mJOA score increased significantly from 13.1 (SD 2.3) at baseline to 14.2 (SD 3.3) at 10 years (p = 0.01). A minimal clinically important difference was achieved in 54.1%, and stabilization of functional status was maintained in 75.0% in the long term. Patients who worsened were older (median 63 vs 52 years, p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (70.0% vs 25.9%, p < 0.01). A beneficial effect of surgery was self-reported by 78.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment for DCM results in satisfactory improvement of functional outcome that is maintained at 10-year follow-up.

ABBREVIATIONS

CSM-I = Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy International; DCM = degenerative cervical myelopathy; MCID = minimal clinically important difference; mJOA = modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association; OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 (PDF 484 KB)

Illustration from Lee et al. (pp 822–829). Copyright Sun Joo Kim. Published with permission.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Akbar MA, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Furlan JC, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(2):108124.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Boogaarts HD, Bartels RHMA. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(2)(suppl 2):139141.

  • 3

    Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(12):E675E693.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Tetreault LA, Karadimas S, Wilson JR, Arnold PM, Kurpad S, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG. The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the rate of hospitalization following spinal cord injury: an updated systematic review. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3)(suppl):28S34S.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Kopjar B, Bohm PE, Arnold JH, Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Arnold PM. Outcomes of surgical decompression in patients with very severe degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2018;43(16):11021109.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Tetreault L, Wilson JR, Kotter MRN, Côté P, Nouri A, Kopjar B, et al. Is preoperative duration of symptoms a significant predictor of functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy? Neurosurgery. 2019;85(5):642647.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Kurpad S, Brodke DS, Wilson JR, Smith JS, et al. Change in functional impairment, disability, and quality of life following operative treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3)(suppl):53S69S.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Fehlings M, Tetreault L, Riew K, Middleton JW, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):70S83S.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fehlings MG, Ibrahim A, Tetreault L, Albanese V, Alvarado M, Arnold P, et al. A global perspective on the outcomes of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results from the prospective multicenter AOSpine international study on 479 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(17):13221328.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(1):7884.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Tetreault L, Nouri A, Kopjar B, Côté P, Fehlings MG. The minimum clinically important difference of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(21):16531659.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Côté P, Arnold P, Fehlings MG. A clinical prediction rule for functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy analysis of an international prospective multicenter data set of 757 subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(24):20382046.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hirai T, Yoshii T, Sakai K, Inose H, Yamada T, Kato T, et al. Long-term results of a prospective study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(1):3238.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kadaňka Z, Bednařík J, Novotný O, Urbánek I, Dušek L. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):15331538.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4(3):286295.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Davies BM, McHugh M, Elgheriani A, Kolias AG, Tetreault LA, Hutchinson PJ, et al. Reported outcome measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0157263.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Bartels RHMA, Verbeek ALM, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH. Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(5):10131016.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):14951499.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Burkhardt BW, Brielmaier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Sharif S, Oertel JM. Smith-Robinson procedure with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a 26-year follow-up of 23 patients. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(4):12461253.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Xu BS, Zhang ZL, Le Huec JC, Xia Q, Hu YC. Long-term follow-up results and radiographic findings of anterior surgery with Cloward trephination for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(2):105113.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Ikenaga M, Shikata J, Tanaka C. Long-term results over 10 years of anterior corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2006;31(14):15681575.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001;26(13):14431448.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Li Z, Xue Y, He D, Tang Y, Ding H, Wang Y, et al. Extensive laminectomy for multilevel cervical stenosis with ligamentum flavum hypertrophy: more than 10 years follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(8):16051612.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H, Hoshino Y. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):15601566.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Motosuneya T, Maruyama T, Yamada H, Tsuzuki N, Sakai H. Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):6872.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—average 14-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2006;31(26):29983005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001;26(5):479487.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Kawaguchi Y, Nakano M, Yasuda T, Seki S, Hori T, Suzuki K, et al. More than 20 years follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2016;41(20):15701579.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K. Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2)(suppl):180189.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Evaniew N, Cadotte DW, Dea N, Bailey CS, Christie SD, Fisher CG, et al. Clinical predictors of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an external validation study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(2):129137.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Kopjar B, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Fehlings M. Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(1):E23E28.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    van Geest S, de Vormer AMJ, Arts MP, Peul WC, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(2)(suppl 2):229235.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M, Idler RK, Martin AR, Ganau M, et al. Significant predictors of outcome following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(1):115127.e35.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Sarkar S, Rajshekhar V. Long-term sustainability of functional improvement following central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2018;43(12):E703E711.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Tetreault L, Lange SF, Chotai S, Kryshtalskyj MT, Martin AR, Ahuja CS, et al. A systematic review of definitions for neurological complications and disease progression in patients treated surgically for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2019;44(18):13181331.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Kato S, Nouri A, Reihani-Kermani H, Oshima Y, Cheng J, Fehlings MG. Postoperative resolution of magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity changes and the associated impact on outcomes in degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of a global cohort of patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2018;43(12):824831.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Kong L, Bai J, Zhang B, Shen Y, Tian D. Predictive factors of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:483488.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Garshick E, Kelley A, Cohen SA, Garrison A, Tun CG, Gagnon D, Brown R. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(7):408416.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Bakkum AJT, Paulson TAW, Bishop NC, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Stolwijk-Swüste JM, van Kuppevelt DJ, et al. Effects of hybrid cycle and handcycle exercise on cardiovascular disease risk factors in people with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(6):523530.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Tetreault LA, Zhu MP, Howard RM, Sorefan-Mangou F, Patel AA, Schroeder GD, et al. The discrepancy between functional outcome and self-reported health status after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2019;19(11):18091815.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Sajobi TT, Fiest KM, Wiebe S. Changes in quality of life after epilepsy surgery: the role of reprioritization response shift. Epilepsia. 2014;55(9):13311338.

  • 42

    Jakola AS, Solheim O, Gulati S, Sagberg LM. Is there a response shift in generic health-related quality of life 6 months after glioma surgery? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(2):377384.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Schwartz CE, Stucky B, Rivers CS, Noonan VK, Finkelstein JA. Quality of life and adaptation in people with spinal cord injury: response shift effects from 1 to 5 years postinjury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(8):15991608.e1.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Finkelstein JA, Razmjou H, Schwartz CE. Response shift and outcome assessment in orthopedic surgery: is there a difference between complete and partial treatment? J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(11):11891190.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Ghogawala Z, Terrin N, Dunbar MR, Breeze JL, Freund KM, Kanter AS, et al. Effect of ventral vs dorsal spinal surgery on patient-reported physical functioning in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(10):942951.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 159 159 159
Full Text Views 67 67 67
PDF Downloads 106 106 106
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0