Open-door laminoplasty with stand-alone autologous bone spacers: evaluation of enlarged laminar arch with CT–multiplanar reconstruction

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ishikiriseiki Hospital, Osaka; and
  • | 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to determine the efficacy of open-door laminoplasty with stand-alone autologous bone spacer for preserving enlarged lamina in patients with cervical myelopathy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with stand-alone autologous bone spacer and underwent CT 1 week and 1 year after surgery were included in this study. There were 20 men and 13 women, with an average (range) age of 65.0 (37–86) years. Seventeen patients were younger than 70 years, and 16 patients were older than 70 years. Autogenous bone spacers made from spinous processes were used in all patients. Slits were made on both sides of the spacers. The lamina was raised with a curette, and a spacer was inserted without any sutures. Before surgery and 1 week and 1 year after surgery, the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the spinal canal was measured using midsagittal-plane CT–multiplanar reconstruction. The bone union rate of the hinge side and autogenous bone spacer of each lamina was determined using CT images obtained 1 year after surgery. Results 1 year after surgery were evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD APD increase rate was 56.3% ± 21.3% 1 week after surgery and 51.7% ± 20.6% 1 year later. The average APD decrease rate was 2.9% ± 3.8%. The bone union rate on the hinge side was 100%, and that of autologous bone spacer was 93.8% 1 year after surgery. The mean APD decrease rate was 3.3% in patients younger than 70 years and 2.3% in those older than 70 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05, nonpaired t-test). The JOA score averaged 10.1 before surgery and 13.3 a year after surgery (total score 17). The average improvement rate was 46.3% ± 26.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors devised and implemented a technique for inserting an autologous bone spacer between the opened lamina and lateral mass without sutures. The enlarged spinal canal was maintained 1 year after surgery. This simple method does not require any instrumentation or additional cost to stabilize the opened lamina.

ABBREVIATIONS

APD = anteroposterior diameter; CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MPR = multiplanar reconstruction; OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; SSI = surgical site infection.

Images from Shimizu et al. (pp 616–623).

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, et al. Risk factors for closure of lamina after open-door laminoplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(6):530537.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Lee DH, Park SA, Kim NH, et al. Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(25):E1634E1640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, et al. Novel hybrid hydroxyapatite spacers ensure sufficient bone bonding in cervical laminoplasty. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(6):10781084.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujimoto Y, et al. Expansive laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic spacers: comparison with autogenous bone spacers. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(8):547552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Inui T, Inokuchi K, Watanabe Y, et al. Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):475.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Rhee JM, Register B, Hamasaki T, Franklin B. Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(1):914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Duetzmann S, Cole T, Ratliff JK. Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(1):2434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Park AE, Heller JG. Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion--surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(4):265271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Park YK, Lee DY, Hur JW, Moon HJ. Delayed hinge fracture after plate-augmented, cervical open-door laminoplasty and its clinical significance. Spine J. 2014;14(7):12051213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hashimoto K, Aizawa T, Ozawa H, et al. Reoperation rates after laminoplasty for cervical disorders: a 26-year period survival function method analysis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3(4):304311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Tamai K, Suzuki A, Terai H, et al. Laminar closure after expansive open-door laminoplasty: fixation methods and cervical alignments impact on the laminar closure and surgical outcomes. Spine J. 2016;16(9):10621069.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Wada KI, Kudo H. Relationship between enlargement of the cross-sectional area of the dural sac and neurological improvements after cervical laminoplasty: differences between cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018;3(1):2736.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kanemura A, Doita M, Iguchi T, et al. Delayed dural laceration by hydroxyapatite spacer causing tetraparesis following double-door laminoplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(2):121128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Noguchi H, Koda M, Funayama T, et al. Regenos spacers are not suitable for open-door laminoplasty because of serious adverse events caused by their insufficient mechanical strength. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;56:5055.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Kuraishi K, Hanakita J, Takahashi T, et al. Remarkable epidural scar formation compressing the cervical cord after osteoplastic laminoplasty with hydroxyapatite spacer. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(5):497501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 150 150 128
Full Text Views 50 50 38
PDF Downloads 78 78 60
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0