Improvement in cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after vertebral body sliding osteotomy in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and kyphosis

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine; and
  • 2 Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Children’s Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) is a safe, novel technique for anterior decompression in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Another advantage of VBSO may be the restoration of cervical lordosis through multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) above and below the osteotomy level. This study aimed to evaluate the improvement and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after VBSO.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients were included; 34 patients had undergone VBSO, and 31 had undergone anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs were used to evaluate the improvements in cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after VBSO. C0–2 lordosis, C2–7 lordosis, segmental lordosis, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were measured. Subgroup analysis was performed between 15 patients with 1-level VBSO and 19 patients with 2-level VBSO. Patients with 1-level VBSO were compared to patients who had undergone 1-level ACCF.

RESULTS

C0–2 lordosis (41.3° ± 7.1°), C2–7 lordosis (7.1° ± 12.8°), segmental lordosis (3.1° ± 9.2°), and C2–7 SVA (21.5 ± 11.7 mm) showed significant improvements at the final follow-up (39.3° ± 7.2°, 13° ± 9.9°, 15.2° ± 8.5°, and 18.4 ± 7.9 mm, respectively) after VBSO (p = 0.049, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.038, respectively). The postoperative segmental lordosis was significantly larger in 2-level VBSO (18.8° ± 11.6°) than 1-level VBSO (10.3° ± 5.5°, p = 0.014). The final segmental lordosis was larger in the 1-level VBSO (12.5° ± 6.2°) than the 1-level ACCF (7.2° ± 7.6°, p = 0.023). Segmental lordosis increased postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was maintained until the final follow-up (p = 0.062) after VBSO. However, the postoperatively improved segmental lordosis (p < 0.001) decreased at the final follow-up (p = 0.045) after ACCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only C2–7 lordosis and segmental lordosis, but also C0–2 lordosis and C2–7 SVA improved at the final follow-up after VBSO. VBSO improves segmental cervical lordosis markedly through multiple ACDFs above and below the VBSO level, and a preserved vertebral body may provide more structural support.

ABBREVIATIONS ACCF = anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion; ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; NDI = Neck Disability Index; OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; VAS-AP = visual analog scale for arm pain; VAS-NP = visual analog scale for neck pain; VBSO = vertebral body sliding osteotomy.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Kun-Bo Park: Severance Children’s Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pedoskbp@yuhs.ac; kunbopark@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online May 22, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE2089.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Sevki K, Mehmet T, Ufuk T, Results of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior cervical corpectomy and stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(22):24932500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bayerl SH, Pöhlmann F, Finger T, Two-level cervical corpectomy-long-term follow-up reveals the high rate of material failure in patients, who received an anterior approach only. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(2):511518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Belanger TA, Roh JS, Hanks SE, Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Results of anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis in sixty-one North American patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):610615.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Xiao SW, Jiang H, Yang LJ, Xiao ZM. Anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(1):3139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Lee DH, Cho JH, Lee CS, A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy) for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Spine J. 2018;18(6):10991105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Lee DH, Riew KD, Choi SH, Safety and efficacy of a novel anterior decompression technique for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;00:110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Faldini C, Pagkrati S, Leonetti D, Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):674681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Relationship between T1 slope and cervical alignment following multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery: impact of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(7):E396E402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Park MS, Kelly MP, Lee DH, Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine J. 2014;14(7):12281234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(suppl 1):S14S21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):13091316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Basques BA, Louie PK, Mormol J, Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):27452753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Lee DH, Ha JK, Chung JH, A retrospective study to reveal the effect of surgical correction of cervical kyphosis on thoraco-lumbo-pelvic sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(7):22862293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Lundström A, Lundström F. The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(5):537540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(16):20722078.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Bulut MD, Alpayci M, Şenköy E, Decreased vertebral artery hemodynamics in patients with loss of cervical lordosis. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:495500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(26):E990E993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Li Z, Huang J, Zhang Z, A comparison of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(5):E540E546.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Lafage R, Challier V, Liabaud B, Natural head posture in the setting of sagittal spinal deformity: Validation of chin-brow vertical angle, slope of line of sight, and McGregor’s slope with health-related quality of life. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(1):108115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(2):E41E47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Lee SH, Son ES, Seo EM, Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J. 2015;15(4):705712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y. Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(6):956961.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(12):17981802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Lee CH, Sohn MJ, Lee CH, Are there differences in the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following laminoplasty versus fusion?: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(12):887894.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Sakai K, Yoshii T, Hirai T, Cervical sagittal imbalance is a predictor of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(4):299305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Wang S-J, Jiang S-D, Jiang L-S, Dai L-Y. Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(2):185194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, Pryor PW. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(13):14721480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 222 222 53
Full Text Views 94 94 21
PDF Downloads 80 80 18
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0