Predictors of the need for laminectomy after indirect decompression via initial anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusion

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea;
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;
  • 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea; and
  • 4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nan Chang University, Nanchang, China
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate factors that are associated with the need for additional posterior direct decompressive surgery after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

METHODS

Eighty-six adult patients who underwent ALIF or LLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis and foraminal stenosis were enrolled. Patient factors (age, sex, number of surgery levels, and visual analog scale [VAS] score for leg and back pain); procedure-related factors (cage height and lordosis); and radiographic measurements (disc height [DH]; foraminal height [FH], foraminal area [FA], central canal diameter [CCD], and facet joint degeneration [FD]) were analyzed. All patients underwent staged surgery on 2 different days, with the anterior portion first, followed by the posterior portion.

RESULTS

Of 86 patients, 62 underwent posterior decompression and 24 had no posterior decompression. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age, sex, preoperative VAS score for back pain, cage height, cage angulation, preoperative DH, FH, FA, CCD, and FD (p > 0.05). The group that underwent posterior decompression showed statistically different numbers of treated segments (1.92 vs 1.21, p < 0.01), preoperative VAS leg score (7.9 vs 6.3), symptom duration (14.2 months vs 9.4 months), postoperative DH improvement (61.3% vs 96.2%), postoperative FH improvement (21.5% vs 32.1%), postoperative FA improvement (24.1% vs 36.9%), and cage height minus preoperative DH (5.3 mm vs 7.5 mm) compared with the nondecompression group.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be some correlation between the need for posterior decompression and the number of treated segments, VAS leg scores, symptom duration, FH, FA, and difference between the cage height and preoperative DH. In selected patients undergoing staged surgery, indirect decompression without direct decompression may be a reasonable option in treating degenerative spinal conditions.

ABBREVIATIONS ADH = anterior disc height; ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; CCD = central canal diameter; DH = disc height; FA = foraminal area; FD = facet joint degeneration; FH = foraminal height; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; PDH = posterior disc height; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; VAS = visual analog scale; XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Daehyun Park: Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea. spineparkdaehyun@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 24, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.SPINE19314.

Disclosures Dr. Mummaneni is a consultant for DePuy Spine, Globus, and Stryker. He has direct stock ownership in Spinicity/ISD. He receives support for non–study-related clinical or research effort that he oversees from NREF and AOSpine. He receives royalties from DePuy Spine, Springer Publishing, and Thieme Publishers, and he receives honoraria from Spineart. Dr. Chou is a consultant for Medtronic and Globus, and receives royaltie

  • 1

    Castellvi AE, Nienke TW, Marulanda GA, Murtagh RD, Santoni BG: Indirect decompression of lumbar stenosis with transpsoas interbody cages and percutaneous posterior instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:17841791, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC: Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:321329, 2007

  • 3

    Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, : Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7:379386, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Isaacs RE, Sembrano JN, Tohmeh AG: Two-year comparative outcomes of MIS lateral and MIS transforaminal interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: part II: radiographic findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41 (Suppl 8):S133S144, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Kim SJ, Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW, Hung VT: Clinical and radiological outcomes of a new cage for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Korean J Spine 11:145151, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Lang G, Perrech M, Navarro-Ramirez R, Hussain I, Pennicooke B, Maryam F, : Potential and limitations of neural decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion—a systematic review. World Neurosurg 101:99113, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Lee YS, Park SW, Kim YB: Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 55:248254, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Lestini WF, Fulghum JS, Whitehurst LA: Lumbar spinal fusion: advantages of posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Technol Int 3:577590, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Malham GM, Ellis NJ, Parker RM, Seex KA: Clinical outcome and fusion rates after the first 30 extreme lateral interbody fusions. ScientificWorldJournal 2012:246989, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM: Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 24 (Suppl 3):339345, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J: Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. J Clin Neurosci 19:829835, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, : Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease. Yonsei Med J 56:10511059, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L: A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (26 Suppl):S331S337, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435443, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D: Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 164:227230, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, : Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2:670672, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, : Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 26:671678, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P: Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6:8997, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Takata K, Miyamoto K, : Long-term results of anterior interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:12111215, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 668 668 338
Full Text Views 193 193 130
PDF Downloads 151 151 109
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0