PEEK interbody devices for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: association with more than 6-fold higher rates of pseudarthrosis compared to structural allograft

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

OBJECTIVE

Common interbody graft options for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) include allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). PEEK has gained popularity due to its radiolucent properties and a modulus of elasticity similar to that of bone. PEEK devices also result in higher billing costs than allograft, which may drive selection. A previous study found a 5-fold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with the use of PEEK devices compared with structural allograft in single-level ACDF. Here the authors report on the occurrence of pseudarthrosis with PEEK devices versus structural allograft in patients who underwent multilevel ACDF.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 81 consecutive patients who underwent a multilevel ACDF and had radiographic follow-up for at least 1 year. Data were collected on age, sex, BMI, tobacco use, pseudarthrosis, and rate of reoperation for pseudarthrosis. Logistic regression was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients, 35 had PEEK implants and 46 had structural allograft. There were no significant differences between age, sex, smoking status, or BMI in the 2 groups. There were 26/35 (74%) patients with PEEK implants who demonstrated radiographic evidence of pseudarthrosis, compared with 5/46 (11%) patients with structural allograft (p < 0.001, OR 22.2). Five patients (14%) with PEEK implants required reoperation for pseudarthrosis, compared with 0 patients with allograft (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reinforces previous findings on 1-level ACDF outcomes and suggests that the use of PEEK in multilevel ACDF results in statistically significantly higher rates of radiographic pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery than allograft. Surgeons should consider these findings when determining graft options, and reimbursement policies should reflect these discrepancies.

ABBREVIATIONS ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; DBM = demineralized bone matrix; rhBMP = bone morphogenetic protein.

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Khoi D. Than: Duke University, Durham, NC. khoi.than@duke.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 24, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.SPINE19788.

Disclosures Khoi D. Than is an occasional consultant for Bioventus.

  • 1

    Chen F, He W, Mahaney K, Noeller J, Mhanna N, Viljoen S, : Alternative grafts in anterior cervical fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:20492055, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Daniels AH, Kawaguchi S, Contag AG, Rastegar F, Waagmeester G, Anderson PA, : Hospital charges associated with “never events”: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 25:165169, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O: Bone allografts: What they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:574579, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Goz V, Rane A, Abtahi AM, Lawrence BD, Brodke DS, Spiker WR: Geographic variations in the cost of spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:13801389, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Hee HT, Kundnani V: Rationale for use of polyetheretherketone polymer interbody cage device in cervical spine surgery. Spine J 10:6669, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Kolstad F, Nygaard OP, Andresen H, Leivseth G: Anterior cervical arthrodesis using a "stand alone" cylindrical titanium cage: prospective analysis of radiographic parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:15451550, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Krause KL, Obayashi JT, Bridges KJ, Raslan AM, Than KD: Fivefold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with polyetheretherketone interbody device than with structural allograft used for 1-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 30:4651, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Kurtz SM, Devine JN: PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28:48454869, 2007

  • 9

    Lee DH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Cho SK, Kim C, : What is the fate of pseudarthrosis detected 1 year after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E23E28, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Lu DC, Tumialán LM, Chou D: Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without rhBMP-2: a comparison of dysphagia rates and outcomes in 150 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 18:4349, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Maharaj MM, Phan K, Mobbs RJ: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) autograft versus graft substitutes: what do patients prefer? A clinical study. J Spine Surg 2:105110, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Martin AB, Hartman M, Washington B, Catlin A: National health care spending in 2017: growth slows to post-great recession rates; share of GDP stabilizes. Health Aff (Millwood) 38:101377hlthaff201805085, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Martin CT, D’Oro A, Buser Z, Youssef JA, Park JB, Meisel HJ, : Trends and costs of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of inpatient and outpatient procedures. Iowa Orthop J 38:167176, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K: Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:12261232, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Phillips FM, Carlson G, Emery SE, Bohlman HH: Anterior cervical pseudarthrosis. Natural history and treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:15851589, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Pirkle S, Kaskovich S, Cook D, Ho A, Shi LL, Lee MJ: Cages in ACDF are associated with a higher nonunion rate than allograft: a stratified comparative analysis of 6130 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:384388, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Pollock R, Alcelik I, Bhatia C, Chuter G, Lingutla K, Budithi C, : Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques. Eur Spine J 17:845852, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Saifi C, Fein AW, Cazzulino A, Lehman RA, Phillips FM, An HS, : Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013. Spine J 18:10221029, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Schnee CL, Freese A, Weil RJ, Marcotte PJ: Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:22222227, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Sethi A, Craig J, Bartol S, Chen W, Jacobson M, Coe C, : Radiographic and CT evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-assisted spinal interbody fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W128W133, 2011 (Erratum in AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1024, 2011)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Singh K, Qureshi S: ISASS Policy Statement—cervical interbody. Int J Spine Surg 8:13, 2014

  • 22

    Steinhaus ME, Hill PS, Yang J, Feuchtbaum E, Bronheim RS, Prabhakar P, : Urinary N-telopeptide can predict pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:770776, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Vaidya R, Carp J, Sethi A, Bartol S, Craig J, Les CM: Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Eur Spine J 16:12571265, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Virk SS, Elder JB, Sandhu HS, Khan SN: The cost effectiveness of polyetheretheketone (PEEK) cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E482E492, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Yoon ST, Konopka JA, Wang JC, Youssef JA, Meisel HJ, Brodke DS, : ACDF graft selection by surgeons: survey of AOSpine members. Global Spine J 7:410416, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Santos ER: Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). J Clin Neurosci 38:118121, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Zaki O, Jain N, Yu E, Khan SN: 30- and 90-day unplanned readmission rates, causes, and risk factors after cervical fusion: a single-institution analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:762769, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 252 252 252
Full Text Views 73 73 73
PDF Downloads 87 87 87
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0