Diagnostic and therapeutic values of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort and meta-analysis
With the advent of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM), surgical outcomes of various neurosurgical pathologies, such as brain tumors and spinal deformities, have improved. However, its diagnostic and therapeutic value in resecting intradural extramedullary (ID-EM) spinal tumors has not been well documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to summarize the clinical results of IONM in patients with ID-EM spinal tumors.
A retrospective patient database review identified 103 patients with ID-EM spinal tumors who underwent tumor resection with IONM (motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-running electromyography) from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were classified as those without any new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up (group A; n = 86) and those with new deficits (group B; n = 17). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and IONM findings were collected and statistically analyzed. In addition, a meta-analysis in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed to estimate the overall pooled diagnostic accuracy of IONM in ID-EM spinal tumor resection.
No intergroup differences were discovered between the groups regarding baseline characteristics and operative data. In multivariate analysis, significant IONM changes (p < 0.001) and tumor location (thoracic vs others, p = 0.018) were associated with new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. In predicting these changes, IONM yielded a sensitivity of 82.4% (14/17), specificity of 90.7% (78/86), positive predictive value (PPV) of 63.6% (14/22), negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% (78/81), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893. The diagnostic value slightly decreased in patients with schwannomas (AUC = 0.875) and thoracic tumors (AUC = 0.842). Among 81 patients who did not demonstrate significant IONM changes at the end of surgery, 19 patients (23.5%) exhibited temporary intraoperative exacerbation of IONM signals, which were recovered by interruption of surgical maneuvers; none of these patients developed new neurological deficits postoperatively. Including the present study, 5 articles encompassing 323 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, and the overall pooled diagnostic value of IONM was a sensitivity of 77.9%, a specificity of 91.1%, PPV of 56.7%, and NPV of 95.7%.
IONM for the resection of ID-EM spinal tumors is a reasonable modality to predict new postoperative neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. Future prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate its diagnostic and therapeutic utility.
Correspondence Sheng-fu L. Lo: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. firstname.lastname@example.org.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 1, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181095.
W.I. and J.C. contributed equally to this work.
Disclosures Mr. Casaos is an HHMI Medical Student Research Fellow. Dr. Theodore is a consultant to Globus Medical. Dr. Gokaslan receives non−study-related research support from AOSpine North America and honoraria from AO Foundation and is a shareholder of Spinal Kinetic as well as US Spine. Dr. Sciubba is a consultant to Medtronic, DePuy-Synthes, Stryker, NuVasive, K2M, Baxter, and Misonix. Dr. Witham receives non–study-related support from the Gordon and Marilyn Macklin Foundation as well as Eli Lilly and Co. Dr. Wolinsky is a consultant to Siemens and DePuy-Synthes. Dr. Lo receives non–study-related financial support from the AO Foundation and Chordoma Foundation.
AccadbledFHenryPde GauzyJSCahuzacJP: Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery using an epidural electrode. Results of a prospective, consecutive series of 191 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)31:2614–26232006
AccadbledF, HenryP, de GauzyJS, CahuzacJP: Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery using an epidural electrode. Results of a prospective, consecutive series of 191 cases. 31:2614–2623, 200610.1097/01.brs.0000240642.28495.9917047554)| false
ClarkAJSafaeeMChouDWeinsteinPRMolinaroAMClarkJPIII: comparative sensitivity of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring in predicting postoperative neurologic deficits: nondegenerative versus degenerative myelopathy. Global Spine J6:452–4582016
EseonuCIRincon-TorroellaJReFaeyKLeeYMNangianaJVivas-BuitragoT: Awake craniotomy vs craniotomy under general anesthesia for perirolandic gliomas: evaluating perioperative complications and extent of resection. Neurosurgery81:481–4892017
EseonuCI, Rincon-TorroellaJ, ReFaeyK, LeeYM, NangianaJ, Vivas-BuitragoT, : Awake craniotomy vs craniotomy under general anesthesia for perirolandic gliomas: evaluating perioperative complications and extent of resection. 81:481–489, 201710.1093/neuros/nyx02328327900)| false
GuoLQuiñones-HinojosaAYinglingCDWeinsteinPR: Continuous EMG recordings and intraoperative electrical stimulation for identification and protection of cervical nerve roots during foraminal tumor surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech19:37–422006
KanekoKKatoYKojimaTImajyoYTaguchiT: Intraoperative electrophysiologic studies on the functions of nerve roots involved in cervical dumbbell-shaped schwannoma and their clinical utility. J Spinal Disord Tech19:571–5762006
KanekoK, KatoY, KojimaT, ImajyoY, TaguchiT: Intraoperative electrophysiologic studies on the functions of nerve roots involved in cervical dumbbell-shaped schwannoma and their clinical utility. 19:571–576, 20061714630010.1097/01.bsd.0000211227.04802.b3)| false
KangHGwakHSShinSHWooMKJeongIHYooH: Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors. Spinal Cord55:906–9102017
KreinerDSShafferWOBaisdenJGilbertTSummersJTotonJ: Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Burr Ridge, IL: North American Spine Society2011(http://content.guidelinecentral.com/guideline/get/pdf/4230) [Accessed December 24 2018]
KreinerDS, ShafferWO, BaisdenJ, GilbertT, SummersJ, TotonJ, : . Burr Ridge, IL: North American Spine Society, 2011(http://content.guidelinecentral.com/guideline/get/pdf/4230) [Accessed December 24, 2018])| false
LakomkinNMistryAMZuckermanSLLadnerTKothariPLeeNJ: Utility of intraoperative monitoring in the resection of spinal cord tumors: an analysis by tumor location and anatomical region. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)43:287–2942018
LakomkinN, MistryAM, ZuckermanSL, LadnerT, KothariP, LeeNJ, : Utility of intraoperative monitoring in the resection of spinal cord tumors: an analysis by tumor location and anatomical region. 43:287–294, 201828658041)| false
LukKD, HuY, WongYW, CheungKM: Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)26:1772–1777, 200110.1097/00007632-200108150-00008)| false
MartirosyanNL, FeuersteinJS, TheodoreN, CavalcantiDD, SpetzlerRF, PreulMC: Blood supply and vascular reactivity of the spinal cord under normal and pathological conditions. 15:238–251, 201110.3171/2011.4.SPINE1054321663407)| false
NgZNgSNgaVTeoKLwinSNingC: Intradural spinal tumors-review of postoperative outcomes comparing intramedullary and extramedullary tumors from a single institution’s experience. World Neurosurg109:e229–e2322018
Quinones-HinojosaA, GulatiM, LyonR, GuptaN, YinglingC: Spinal cord mapping as an adjunct for resection of intramedullary tumors: surgical technique with case illustrations. 51:1199–1207, 20021238336510.1097/00006123-200211000-00015)| false
ResnickDK, AndersonPA, KaiserMG, GroffMW, HearyRF, HollyLT, : Electrophysiological monitoring during surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy. 11:245–252, 200910.3171/2009.2.SPINE0873019769504)| false
SalaF, BricoloA, FaccioliF, LanteriP, GerosaM: Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring. 16 (Suppl 2):S130–S139, 200710.1007/s00586-007-0423-x)| false
SamuelNTetreaultLSantaguidaCNaterAMoayeriNMassicotteEM: Clinical and pathological outcomes after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a single-institution case series. Neurosurg Focus41(2):E82016
SamuelN, TetreaultL, SantaguidaC, NaterA, MoayeriN, MassicotteEM, : Clinical and pathological outcomes after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a single-institution case series. 41(2):E8, 201610.3171/2016.5.FOCUS1614727476850)| false
SutterMEggspuehlerAGrobDJeszenszkyDBeniniAPorchetF: The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients. Eur Spine J16 (Suppl 2):S162–S1702007
SutterM, EggspuehlerA, GrobD, JeszenszkyD, BeniniA, PorchetF, : The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients. 16 (Suppl 2):S162–S170, 200710.1007/s00586-007-0418-7)| false
WicksRTPradillaGRazaSMHadelsbergUCoonALHuangJ: Impact of changes in intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials on stroke rates after clipping of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery70:1114–11242012
XuRRitzlEKSaitMSciubbaDMWolinskyJPWithamTF: A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: analysis of 57 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol Int2:1332011
XuR, RitzlEK, SaitM, SciubbaDM, WolinskyJP, WithamTF, : A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: analysis of 57 consecutive cases. 2:133, 201110.4103/2152-7806.8560622059128)| false