Traditional trajectory (TT) screws are widely used in lumbar fixation. However, they may require revision surgery in some instances, especially in patients with osteoporotic spines. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws may potentially be used to rescue a failed TT screw and vice versa in nonosteoporotic spines. This study aimed to investigate whether a CBT screw can salvage a compromised TT screw in osteoporotic lumbar spines and vice versa.
A total of 42 vertebrae from 17 cadaveric lumbar spines were obtained. Bone mineral density was measured, and a CBT screw was randomly inserted into one side of each vertebra. A TT screw was then inserted into the contralateral side. The biomechanical properties of the screws were tested to determine their insertional torque, pullout strength, and fatigue performance. After checking the screws for the failure of each specimen, the failed screw track was salvaged with a screw of the opposite trajectory. The specimen was then subjected to the same mechanical tests, and results were recorded. A repeat pullout test on TT and CBT screws was also performed.
When CBT screws were used to rescue failed TT screws, the original torque increased by 50%, an average of 81% of the pullout strength of the initial TT screws was retained, and the fatigue performance was equal to that of the original screws, which were considerably stronger than the loose TT screws—that is, the TT repeat screws/TT screws were 33% of the pullout strength of the initial TT screws. When the TT screws were used to salvage the compromised CBT screws, the TT screws retained 51% of the original torque and 54% of the original pullout strength, and these screws were still stronger than the loose CBT screws—that is, the loose CBT screws retained 12% pullout strength of the initial CBT screws. Fatigue performance and the ratio of the pullout strength considerably decreased between the CBT rescue screws and the original CBT screws but slightly changed between the TT rescue screws and the original TT screws.
CBT and TT screws can be applied in a revision technique to salvage each other in osteoporotic lumbar spines. Additionally, CBT and TT screws each retain adequate insertional torque, pullout strength, and fatigue performance when used for revision in osteoporotic lumbar spines.
ABBREVIATIONSBMD = bone mineral density; CBT = cortical bone trajectory; DEXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; PIH = pedicle isthmus height; PIW = pedicle isthmus width; PMMA = polymethylmethacrylate; TT = traditional trajectory.
Correspondence Cai-Liang Shen: The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. email@example.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 8, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.12.SPINE18970.
R.J.Z. and H.M.L. contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
BaiB, KummerFJ, SpivakJ: Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute. 26:2679–2683, 200110.1097/00007632-200112150-0000911740354)| false
CoeJDWardenKEHerzigMAMcAfeePC: Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)15:902–9071990
CoeJD, WardenKE, HerzigMA, McAfeePC: Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. 15:902–907, 1990225997810.1097/00007632-199009000-00012)| false
HiranoT, HasegawaK, TakahashiHE, UchiyamaS, HaraT, WashioT, : Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. 22:2504–2510, 1997938385610.1097/00007632-199711010-00007)| false
HuMH, WuHT, ChangMC, YuWK, WangST, LiuCL: Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body. 20:1281–1288, 20112153385210.1007/s00586-011-1824-4)| false
LehmanRAJrKukloTR: Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)28:2072–20772003
LehmanRAJr, KukloTR: Use of the anatomic trajectory for thoracic pedicle screw salvage after failure/violation using the straight-forward technique: a biomechanical analysis. 28:2072–2077, 20031450191610.1097/01.BRS.0000084628.37133.BA)| false
LiB, JiangB, FuZ, ZhangD, WangT: Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images. 29:2438–2444, 200410.1097/01.brs.0000144355.50660.6515507808)| false
MatsukawaK, YatoY, KatoT, ImabayashiH, AsazumaT, NemotoK: In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique. 39:E240–E245, 201410.1097/BRS.0000000000000116)| false
MatsukawaKYatoYNemotoOImabayashiHAsazumaTNemotoK: Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech26:E248–E2532013
MisenhimerGR, PeekRD, WiltseLL, RothmanSL, WidellEHJr: Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. 14:367–372, 1989271803810.1097/00007632-198904000-00004)| false
MullinJP, PerlmutterB, SchmidtE, BenzelE, SteinmetzMP: Radiographic feasibility study of cortical bone trajectory and traditional pedicle screw dual trajectories. 25:727–732, 201610.3171/2016.4.SPINE15148327391396)| false
OkuyamaK, SatoK, AbeE, InabaH, ShimadaY, MuraiH: Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. 18:2240–2245, 199310.1097/00007632-199311000-00016)| false
PfeiferBAKragMHJohnsonC: Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation. A biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)19:350–3531994
PfeiferBA, KragMH, JohnsonC: Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation. A biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. 19:350–353, 1994817137010.1097/00007632-199402000-00017)| false
RodriguezANealMTLiuASomasundaramAHsuWBranchCLJr: Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation. Neurosurg Focus36(3):E92014
SansurCACaffesNMIbrahimiDMPrattNLLewisEMMurgatroydAA: Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine25:467–4762016
SansurCA, CaffesNM, IbrahimiDM, PrattNL, LewisEM, MurgatroydAA, : Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. 25:467–476, 201610.3171/2016.2.SPINE151046)| false
SmithSA, AbitbolJJ, CarlsonGD, AndersonDR, TaggartKW, GarfinSR: The effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation. 18:1006–1010, 199310.1097/00007632-199306150-000098367767)| false
UenoMImuraTInoueGTakasoM: Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine19:600–6072013
UenoM, ImuraT, InoueG, TakasoM: Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis: technical note. 19:600–607, 20132401089910.3171/2013.7.SPINE13191)| false
WeinsteinJNSprattKFSpenglerDBrickCReidS: Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)13:1012–10181988