The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) is a statewide, multicenter quality improvement initiative. Using MSSIC data, the authors sought to identify 90-day adverse events and their associated risk factors (RFs) after cervical spine surgery.
A total of 8236 cervical spine surgery cases were analyzed. Multivariable generalized estimating equation regression models were constructed to identify RFs for adverse events; variables tested included age, sex, diabetes mellitus, disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, central stenosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification System (ASA) class > II, myelopathy, private insurance, anterior versus posterior approach, revision procedures, number of surgical levels, length of procedure, blood loss, preoperative ambulation, ambulation day of surgery, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition.
Ninety days after cervical spine surgery, adverse events identified included radicular findings (11.6%), readmission (7.7%), dysphagia requiring dietary modification (feeding tube or nothing by mouth [NPO]) (6.4%), urinary retention (4.7%), urinary tract infection (2.2%), surgical site hematoma (1.1%), surgical site infection (0.9%), deep vein thrombosis (0.7%), pulmonary embolism (0.5%), neurogenic bowel/bladder (0.4%), myelopathy (0.4%), myocardial infarction (0.4%), wound dehiscence (0.2%), claudication (0.2%), and ileus (0.2%). RFs for dysphagia included anterior approach (p < 0.001), fusion procedures (p = 0.030), multiple-level surgery when considering anterior procedures only (p = 0.037), and surgery duration (p = 0.002). RFs for readmission included ASA class > II (p < 0.001), while preoperative ambulation (p = 0.001) and private insurance (p < 0.001) were protective. RFs for urinary retention included increasing age (p < 0.001) and male sex (p < 0.001), while anterior-approach surgery (p < 0.001), preoperative ambulation (p = 0.001), and ambulation day of surgery (p = 0.001) were protective. Preoperative ambulation (p = 0.010) and anterior approach (p = 0.002) were protective of radicular findings.
A multivariate analysis from a large, multicenter, prospective database identified the common adverse events after cervical spine surgery, along with their associated RFs. This information can lead to more informed surgeons and patients. The authors found that early mobilization after cervical spine surgery has the potential to significantly decrease adverse events.
ABBREVIATIONSASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification System; BCBSM = Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan; BCN = Blue Care Network; CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; DRG = diagnosis-related group; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; GEE = generalized estimating equation; MSSIC = Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative; NPO = nothing by mouth; PE = pulmonary embolism; POD = postoperative day; RF = risk factor; UTI = urinary tract infection.
Correspondence Victor Chang: Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, West Bloomfield Township, MI. email@example.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online February 15, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.10.SPINE18666.Disclosures Dr. Schwalb: salary support for MSSIC role as Associate Director from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, consultant for Huidant, LLC, and clinical or research support for the study described from Medtronic. Dr. Park: consultant for Globus, NuVasive, Medtronic, and Allosource; and royalties from Globus. Dr. Chang: consultant for Globus Medical, K2M, and SpineGuard.Although Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and MSSIC work collaboratively, the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of BCBSM or any of its employees. Support for MSSIC is provided by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network as part of the BCBSM Value Partnerships program.
AsherALSperoffTDittusRSParkerSLDaviesJMSeldenN: The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)39 (22 Suppl 1):S106–S1162014
AsherAL, SperoffT, DittusRS, ParkerSL, DaviesJM, SeldenN, : The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. 39 (22 Suppl 1):S106–S116, 201410.1097/BRS.0000000000000579)| false
BasquesBA, McLynnRP, FiceMP, SamuelAM, LukasiewiczAM, BohlDD, : Results of database studies in spine surgery can be influenced by missing data. 475:2893–2904, 201710.1007/s11999-016-5175-727896677)| false
BernsteinDN, BrodellD, LiY, RuberyPT, MesfinA: Impact of the economic downturn on elective lumbar spine surgery in the United States: a national trend analysis, 2003 to 2013. 7:213–219, 20172866010210.1177/2192568217694151)| false
BernsteinDN, ThirukumaranC, SalehA, MolinariRW, MesfinA: Complications and readmission after cervical spine surgery in elderly patients: an analysis of 1786 patients. 103:859–868.e8, 201710.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.10928456739)| false
BhashyamNDe la Garza RamosRNakhlaJNasserRJadaAPurvisTE: Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement. Neurosurg Focus42(2):E62017
BhashyamN, De la Garza RamosR, NakhlaJ, NasserR, JadaA, PurvisTE, : Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement. 42(2):E6, 201710.3171/2016.11.FOCUS1640728142261)| false
BronsonWHKingeryMTHutzlerLKariaRErricoTBoscoJ: Lack of cost savings for lumbar spine fusions after bundled payments for care improvement initiative: a consequence of increased case complexity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)[epub ahead of print] 2018
BronsonWH, KingeryMT, HutzlerL, KariaR, ErricoT, BoscoJ, : Lack of cost savings for lumbar spine fusions after bundled payments for care improvement initiative: a consequence of increased case complexity. [epub ahead of print], 2018)| false
ChangVLuDCHoffmanHBuchananCHollyLT: Clinical results of cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 58 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol Int5 (Suppl 3):S133–S1372014
ChangV, LuDC, HoffmanH, BuchananC, HollyLT: Clinical results of cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 58 consecutive patients. 5 (Suppl 3):S133–S137, 201410.4103/2152-7806.13067024843810)| false
ColeTVeeravaguAZhangMAzadTDDesaiARatliffJK: Anterior versus posterior approach for multilevel degenerative cervical disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of the MarketScan Database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)40:1033–10382015
ColeT, VeeravaguA, ZhangM, AzadTD, DesaiA, RatliffJK: Anterior versus posterior approach for multilevel degenerative cervical disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of the MarketScan Database. 40:1033–1038, 20152576869010.1097/BRS.0000000000000872)| false
GolubovskyJLIlyasHChenJTanenbaumJEMrozTESteinmetzMP: Risk factors and associated complications for postoperative urinary retention after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J18:1533–15392018
GolubovskyJL, IlyasH, ChenJ, TanenbaumJE, MrozTE, SteinmetzMP: Risk factors and associated complications for postoperative urinary retention after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. 18:1533–1539, 201810.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.02229447854)| false
KatoSNouriAWuDNoriSTetreaultLFehlingsMG: Comparison of anterior and posterior surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: an MRI-based propensity-score-matched analysis using data from the prospective multicenter AOSpine CSM North America and international studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am99:1013–10212017
KatoS, NouriA, WuD, NoriS, TetreaultL, FehlingsMG: Comparison of anterior and posterior surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: an MRI-based propensity-score-matched analysis using data from the prospective multicenter AOSpine CSM North America and international studies. 99:1013–1021, 20172863259010.2106/JBJS.16.00882)| false
MinhasSV, MazmudarAS, PatelAA: Pre-operative functional status as a predictor of morbidity and mortality after elective cervical spine surgery. 99-B:824–828, 20172856640410.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1149.R1)| false
PassiasPGHornSRJalaiCMPoormanGBonoOJRamchandranS: Comparative analysis of perioperative complications between a multicenter prospective cervical deformity database and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Spine J17:1633–16402017
SankarA, JohnsonSR, BeattieWS, TaitG, WijeysunderaDN: Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. 113:424–432, 20142472770510.1093/bja/aeu100)| false
SchoenfeldAJOchoaLMBaderJOBelmontPJJr: Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Bone Joint Surg Am93:1577–15822011
SchoenfeldAJ, OchoaLM, BaderJO, BelmontPJJr: Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. 93:1577–1582, 201110.2106/JBJS.J.0104821915571)| false
ShinJIKimJSSteinbergerJDiCapuaJChoSK: Patient factors contributing to prolonged postoperative length of stay and increased rate of readmission after elective posterior cervical fusion. Clin Spine Surg31:E55–E612018
WadhwaRKOhyaJVogelTDCarreonLYAsherALKnightlyJJ: Risk factors for 30-day reoperation and 3-month readmission: analysis from the Quality and Outcomes Database lumbar spine registry. J Neurosurg Spine27:131–1362017
WangT, TianXM, LiuSK, WangH, ZhangYZ, DingWY: Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: a meta-analysis for last decade. 96:e6421, 201710.1097/MD.000000000000642128328846)| false