Unintended facet fusions after Dynesys dynamic stabilization in patients with spondylolisthesis

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The pedicle screw–based Dynesys dynamic stabilization (DDS) has reportedly become a surgical option for lumbar spondylosis and spondylolisthesis. However, it is still unclear whether the dynamic construct remains mobile or eventually fuses. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of unintended facet arthrodesis after DDS and its association with spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

This retrospective study was designed to review 105 consecutive patients with 1- or 2-level lumbar spondylosis who were treated with DDS surgery. The patients were then divided into 2 groups according to preexisting spondylolisthesis or not. All patients underwent laminectomies, foraminotomies, and DDS. The clinical outcomes were measured using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. All medical records, including pre- and postoperative radiographs, CT scans, and MR images, were also reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients who completed the postoperative follow-up for more than 30 months were analyzed. The mean age was 64.1 ± 12.9 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 46.3 ± 12.0 months. There were 45 patients in the spondylolisthesis group and 51 patients in the nonspondylolisthesis group. The overall prevalence rate of unintended facet fusion was 52.1% in the series of DDS. Patients with spondylolisthesis were older (67.8 vs 60.8 years, p = 0.007) and had a higher incidence rate of facet arthrodesis (75.6% vs 31.4%, p < 0.001) than patients without spondylolisthesis. Patients who had spondylolisthesis or were older than 65 years were more likely to have facet arthrodesis (OR 6.76 and 4.82, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, including VAS back and leg pain, ODI, and JOA scores between the 2 groups. Furthermore, regardless of whether or not unintended facet arthrodesis occurred, all patients experienced significant improvement (all p < 0.05) in the clinical evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

During the mean follow-up of almost 4 years, the prevalence of unintended facet arthrodesis was 52.1% in patients who underwent DDS. Although the clinical outcomes were not affected, elderly patients with spondylolisthesis might have a greater chance of facet fusion. This could be a cause of the limited range of motion at the index levels long after DDS.

ABBREVIATIONS DDD = degenerative disc disease; DDS = Dynesys dynamic stabilization; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; ROM = range of motion; VAS = visual analog scale.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Jau-Ching Wu: Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. jauching@gmail.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 7, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE171328.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Bassewitz HHerkowitz H: Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis: current concepts of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (384):54602001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bridwell KHSedgewick TAO’Brien MFLenke LGBaldus C: The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:4614721993

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Cakir BUlmar BKoepp HHuch KPuhl WRichter M: [Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability.] Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:4184242003 (Ger)

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Cheng YWChang PYWu JCChang CCFay LYTu TH: Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization and adjacent-segment disease. J Neurosurg Spine 26:4054062017 (Letter)

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Di Silvestre MLolli FBakaloudis GParisini P: Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2272342010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Fay LYChang PYWu JCHuang WCWang CHTsai TY: Dynesys dynamic stabilization-related facet arthrodesis. Neurosurg Focus 40(1):E42016

  • 7

    Fay LYWu JCTsai TYTu THWu CLHuang WC: Intervertebral disc rehydration after lumbar dynamic stabilization: magnetic resonance image evaluation with a mean followup of four years. Adv Orthop 2013:4375702013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Fay LYWu JCTsai TYWu CLHuang WCCheng H: Dynamic stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis: evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:5355412013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Freudiger SDubois GLorrain M: Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:1271321999

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Glassman SDCarreon LYDjurasovic MDimar JRJohnson JRPuno RM: Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J 9:13212009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Grob DBenini AJunge AMannion AF: Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:3243312005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Ko CCTsai HWHuang WCWu JCChen YCShih YH: Screw loosening in the Dynesys stabilization system: radiographic evidence and effect on outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28(6):E102010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kuo CHChang PYTu THFay LYChang HKWu JC: The effect of lumbar lordosis on screw loosening in Dynesys dynamic stabilization: four-year follow-up with computed tomography. BioMed Res Int 2015:1524352015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kuo CHChang PYWu JCChang HKFay LYTu TH: Dynamic stabilization for L4–5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 40(1):E32016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Kuo CHHuang WCWu JCTu THFay LYWu CL: Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 29:2502582018

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Lee SEJahng TAKim HJ: Facet joint changes after application of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization. Neurosurg Focus 40(1):E62016

  • 17

    Maeda TBuchowski JMKim YJMishiro TBridwell KH: Long adult spinal deformity fusion to the sacrum using rhBMP-2 versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:220522122009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mannion RJNowitzke AMWood MJ: Promoting fusion in minimally invasive lumbar interbody stabilization with low-dose bone morphogenic protein-2—but what is the cost? Spine J 11:5275332011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Nockels RP: Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 (16 Suppl):S68S722005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Panjabi MM: The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 5:3833971992

  • 21

    Putzier MSchneider SVFunk JPerka C: [Application of a dynamic pedicle screw system (DYNESYS) for lumbar segmental degenerations—comparison of clinical and radiological results for different indications.] Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:1661732004 (Ger)

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Putzier MSchneider SVFunk JFTohtz SWPerka C: The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:E109E1142005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Schaeren SBroger IJeanneret B: Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E636E6422008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Schnake KJSchaeren SJeanneret B: Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:4424492006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Schwarzenbach OBerlemann UStoll TMDubois G: Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: DYNESYS. Orthop Clin North Am 36:3633722005

  • 26

    Stoll TMDubois GSchwarzenbach O: The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11 (Suppl 2):S170S1782002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Weinstein JNLurie JDTosteson TDZhao WBlood EATosteson AN: Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:129513042009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Wu JCHuang WCTsai HWKo CCWu CLTu TH: Pedicle screw loosening in dynamic stabilization: incidence, risk, and outcome in 126 patients. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E92011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Yeh MYKuo CHWu JCHuang WCTu THFay LY: Changes of facet joints after dynamic stabilization: continuous degeneration or slow fusion? World Neurosurg 113:e45e502018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 550 550 22
Full Text Views 106 106 5
PDF Downloads 83 83 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar