Radiographic outcome and complications after single-level lumbar extended pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal malalignment: a retrospective analysis of 55 adult spinal deformity patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up
Fixed sagittal spinal malalignment is a common problem in adult spinal deformity (ASD). Various three-column osteotomy techniques, including the extended pedicle subtraction osteotomy (ePSO), may correct global and regional malalignment in this patient population. In contrast to the number of reports on traditional PSO (Schwab grade 3 osteotomy), there is limited literature on the outcomes of ePSO (Schwab grade 4 osteotomy) in ASD surgery. The objective of this retrospective study was to provide focused investigation of radiographic outcomes and complications of single-level lumbar ePSO for ASD patients with fixed sagittal malalignment.
Consecutive ASD patients in whom sagittal malalignment had been treated with single-level lumbar ePSO at the authors’ institution between 2010 and 2015 were analyzed, and those with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included in the study. Radiographic analyses included assessments of segmental lordosis through the ePSO site (sagittal Cobb angle measured from the superior endplate of the vertebra above and inferior endplate of the vertebra below the ePSO), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence and LL mismatch, thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) on standing long-cassette radiographs. Complications were analyzed for the entire group.
Among 71 potentially eligible patients, 55 (77%) had a minimum 2-year follow-up and were included in the study. Overall, the average postoperative increases in ePSO segmental lordosis and overall LL were 41° ± 14° (range 7°–69°, p < 0.001) and 38° ± 11° (range 9°–58°, p < 0.001), respectively. The average SVA improvement was 13 ± 7 cm (range of correction: −33.6 to 3.4 cm, p < 0.001). These measurements were maintained when comparing early postoperative to last follow-up values, respectively (mean follow-up 52 months, range 26–97 months): ePSO segmental lordosis, 34° vs 33°, p = 0.270; LL, 47.3° vs 46.7°, p = 0.339; and SVA, 4 vs 5 cm, p = 0.330. Rod fracture (RF) at the ePSO site occurred in 18.2% (10/55) of patients, and pseudarthrosis (PA) at the ePSO site was confirmed by CT imaging or during rod revision surgery in 14.5% (8/55) of patients. Accessory supplemental rods across the ePSO site, a more recently employed technique, significantly reduced the occurrence of RF or PA on univariate (p = 0.004) and multivariable (OR 0.062, 95% CI 0.007–0.553, p = 0.013) analyses; this effect approached statistical significance on Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.053, log-rank test). Interbody cage placement at the ePSO site resulted in greater ePSO segmental lordosis correction (45° vs 35°, p = 0.007) without significant change in RF or PA (p = 0.304). Transient and persistent motor deficits occurred in 14.5% (8/55) and 1.8% (1/55) of patients, respectively.
Extended PSO is an effective technique to correct fixed sagittal malalignment for ASD. In comparison to traditional PSO techniques, ePSO may allow greater focal correction with comparable complication rates, especially with interbody cage placement at the ePSO site and the use of accessory supplemental rods.
Correspondence Thomas J. Buell: University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA. firstname.lastname@example.org.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 9, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE171367.
C.I.S. and J.S.S. share senior authorship.
Disclosures Dr. C. I. Shaffrey has been a consultant for Medtronic, Nuvasive, Zimmer Biomet, and K2M; has received royalties from Medtronic, Nuvasive, and Zimmer Biomet; is a stock holder in Nuvasive; and has received grants from the NIH, Department of Defense, and the North American Clinical Trials Network for non–study-related effort. Dr. Smith has received royalties from Zimmer Biomet; has been a consultant for Zimmer Biomet, Cerapedics, Nuvasive, K2M, and AlloSource; has received honoraria from Zimmer Biomet, Nuvasive, and K2M; has received support from DePuy Synthes for the study described; has received support from DePuy Synthes and ISSGF for non–study-related effort; and has received fellowship support from the NREF and AOSpine.
BuellTJBuchholzALQuinnJCBessSLineBGAmesCP: A pilot study on posterior polyethylene tethers to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis after multilevel spinal instrumentation for adult spinal deformity. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)[epub ahead of print] 2018
BuellTJ, BuchholzAL, QuinnJC, BessS, LineBG, AmesCP, : A pilot study on posterior polyethylene tethers to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis after multilevel spinal instrumentation for adult spinal deformity. [epub ahead of print], 201829688555)| false
BuellTJChenCJQuinnJCBuchholzALMazurMDMullinJP: Alignment risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis and the effect of lower thoracic junctional tethers for adult spinal deformity. World Neurosurg[epub ahead of print]2018
CharoskyS, GuiguiP, BlamoutierA, RoussoulyP, ChopinD: Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. 37:693–700, 20122250451710.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ff5c1)| false
ChoKJ, BridwellKH, LenkeLG, BerraA, BaldusC: Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. 30:2030–2038, 200510.1097/01.brs.0000179085.92998.ee16166890)| false
DicksonDDLenkeLGBridwellKHKoesterLA: Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)39:1190–11952014
DicksonDD, LenkeLG, BridwellKH, KoesterLA: Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity. 39:1190–1195, 20142517106710.1097/BRS.0000000000000380)| false
EskilssonK, SharmaD, JohanssonC, HedlundR: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive analysis in 104 patients. Does the cause of deformity influence the outcome?27:56–62, 201710.3171/2016.12.SPINE1658528475018)| false
GuptaMCFerreroEMundisGSmithJSShaffreyCISchwabF: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the revision versus primary adult spinal deformity patient: is there a difference in correction and complications?Spine (Phila Pa 1976)40:E1169–E11752015
GuptaMC, FerreroE, MundisG, SmithJS, ShaffreyCI, SchwabF, : Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the revision versus primary adult spinal deformity patient: is there a difference in correction and complications?40:E1169–E1175, 201510.1097/BRS.0000000000001107)| false
GuptaSEksiMSAmesCPDevirenVDurbin-JohnsonBSmithJS: A novel 4-rod technique offers potential to reduce rod breakage and pseudarthrosis in pedicle subtraction osteotomies for adult spinal deformity correction. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)14:449–4562018
HyunSJ, LenkeLG, KimYC, KoesterLA, BlankeKM: Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. 39:1899–1904, 201410.1097/BRS.000000000000055625299168)| false
KimYCLenkeLGHyunSJLeeJHKoesterLABlankeKM: Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)39:1817–18282014
KimYC, LenkeLG, HyunSJ, LeeJH, KoesterLA, BlankeKM: Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision. 39:1817–1828, 20142505465210.1097/BRS.0000000000000526)| false
ParkJHHyunSJKimKJJahngTA: Comparative study between pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and closing-opening wedge osteotomy (fish-mouth PSO) for sagittal plane deformity correction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)42:E899–E9052017
PopaI, OpreaM, AndreiD, MercedeszP, MardareM, PoenaruDV: Utility of the pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of sagittal spine imbalance. 40:1219–1225, 201610.1007/s00264-016-3126-226907875)| false
SchwabFPatelAUngarBFarcyJPLafageV: Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)35:2224–22312010
SchwabF, PatelA, UngarB, FarcyJP, LafageV: Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. 35:2224–2231, 201010.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd421102297)| false
SmithJSSansurCADonaldsonWFIIIPerraJHMudiyamRChomaTJ: Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)36:958–9642011
SmithJS, SansurCA, DonaldsonWFIII, PerraJH, MudiyamR, ChomaTJ, : Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. 36:958–964, 201110.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eabb2621192289)| false
SmithJS, ShaffreyCI, BervenS, GlassmanS, HamillC, HortonW, : Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. 65:86–94, 200910.1227/01.NEU.0000347005.35282.6C19574829)| false
SmithJSShaffreyCIBervenSGlassmanSHamillCHortonW: Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)34:1693–16982009
SmithJS, ShaffreyCI, BervenS, GlassmanS, HamillC, HortonW, : Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up. 34:1693–1698, 200910.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac5fcd19770610)| false
SmithJSShaffreyCIKlinebergELafageVSchwabFLafageR: Complication rates associated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive series with 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine27:444–4572017
SmithJS, ShaffreyE, KlinebergE, ShaffreyCI, LafageV, SchwabFJ, : Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. 21:994–1003, 201410.3171/2014.9.SPINE13117625325175)| false
SteyerbergEW, VickersAJ, CookNR, GerdsT, GonenM, ObuchowskiN, : Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. 21:128–138, 201010.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb220010215)| false
TangJALeasureJMSmithJSBuckleyJMKondrashovDAmesCP: Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery72:276–2832013
TangJA, LeasureJM, SmithJS, BuckleyJM, KondrashovD, AmesCP: Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. 72:276–283, 20132314995610.1227/NEU.0b013e31827ba066)| false
YagiMKingABCunninghamMEBoachie-AdjeiO: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance: does level of proximal fusion affect the outcome? Minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine Deform1:123–1312013