Full-length (36-inch) standing spine radiographs are commonly used by spine surgeons to evaluate patients with lumbar degenerative scoliosis (LDS). Despite this practice, the impact of these images on preoperative decision making and the rate of revision surgery has not been analyzed. The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative full-length standing spine radiographs improve surgical decision making by decreasing the rate of revision surgery in patients with LDS.
From the Health Care Service Corporation administrative claims database, the authors identified patients 50–80 years of age with LDS who had undergone surgery including posterior lumbar decompression and fusion over 2–6 levels and with at least 5 years of continuous coverage after the index surgery. Patients were stratified into the following groups, according to the preoperative imaging studies performed within 6 months before their index surgery: lumbar spine MRI studies only, lumbar spine MRI studies and standard lumbar spine radiographs, CT myelograms, and full-length standing spine radiographs. Survival analysis was performed with the occurrence of a revision within 5 years of the index surgery as the outcome of interest.
A total of 411 patients were included in the study after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Revision surgery within 5 years after the index procedure was most frequent in the patients with preoperative MRI only (41.8%), followed by the patients with a CT myelogram (30.4%) and those with MRI and standard radiographs (24.8%). The lowest revision rate was seen among those with long-cassette standing radiographs (11.1%). Patients whose preoperative evaluation included full-length standing radiographs (OR 0.353, p = 0.034) and MRI studies plus radiographs (OR 0.650, p = 0.022) were less likely to require revision surgery at 5 years after the index procedure.
An assessment of standing alignment using full-length (36-inch) standing radiographs may be beneficial in reducing the risk of revision surgery in patients with lumbar scoliosis. This observation was not limited to patients with large curves or substantial deformity.
ABBREVIATIONSAUC = appropriate use criteria; HCSC = Health Care Service Corporation; LDS = lumbar degenerative scoliosis.
Correspondence Leah Y. Carreon: Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY. firstname.lastname@example.org.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 23, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17638.
Disclosures Dr. Carreon is an employee of Norton Healthcare, has been a consultant for AOSpine, has received travel funds from the University of Southern Denmark and the University of Louisville, and has received support from Pfizer for non–study-related clinical or research effort. Dr. Glassman is an employee of Norton Healthcare and holds a patent with, has been a consultant for, and has received royalties from Medtronic. NuVasive provided funds directly to the database company; no funds were paid to Dr. Glassman or Norton Healthcare.
ChenPG, DaubsMD, BervenS, RaaenLB, AndersonAT, AschSM, : Surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: the development of appropriateness criteria. 41:910–918, 20162667987410.1097/BRS.0000000000001392)| false
DaubsMDLenkeLGBridwellKHChehGKimYJStobbsG: Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient. Evid Based Spine Care J3:27–322012
DaubsMD, LenkeLG, BridwellKH, ChehG, KimYJ, StobbsG: Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient. 3:27–32, 201223531707)| false
HosoganeN, WatanabeK, KonoH, SaitoM, ToyamaY, MatsumotoM: Curve progression after decompression surgery in patients with mild degenerative scoliosis. 18:321–326, 201310.3171/2013.1.SPINE1242623373563)| false
JacksonRPMcManusAC: Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)19:1611–16181994
JacksonRP, McManusAC: Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. 19:1611–1618, 199410.1097/00007632-199407001-00010)| false
Van RoyenBJ, ToussaintHM, KingmaI, BotSD, CaspersM, HarlaarJ, : Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities. 7:408–412, 199810.1007/s005860050098)| false