Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique

Satoshi Maki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Satoshi Maki in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Masaaki Aramomi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara; and

Search for other papers by Masaaki Aramomi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Yusuke Matsuura Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Yusuke Matsuura in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Takeo Furuya Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Takeo Furuya in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Mitsutoshi Ota Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Mitsutoshi Ota in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Yasushi Iijima Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Yasushi Iijima in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Junya Saito Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Junya Saito in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Takane Suzuki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Takane Suzuki in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Chikato Mannoji Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara; and

Search for other papers by Chikato Mannoji in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Kazuhisa Takahashi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Kazuhisa Takahashi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Masashi Yamazaki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan

Search for other papers by Masashi Yamazaki in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Masao Koda Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba;

Search for other papers by Masao Koda in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $392.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $636.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $392.00
USD  $636.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

Fusion surgery with instrumentation is a widely accepted treatment for cervical spine pathologies. The authors propose a novel technique for subaxial cervical fusion surgery using paravertebral foramen screws (PVFS). The authors consider that PVFS have equal or greater biomechanical strength than lateral mass screws (LMS). The authors’ goals of this study were to conduct a biomechanical study of PVFS, to investigate the suitability of PVFS as salvage fixation for failed LMS, and to describe this novel technique.

METHODS

The authors harvested 24 human cervical spine vertebrae (C3–6) from 6 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens from donors whose mean age was 84.3 ± 10.4 years at death. For each vertebra, one side was chosen randomly for PVFS and the other for LMS. For PVFS, a 3.2-mm drill with a stopper was advanced under lateral fluoroscopic imaging. The drill stopper was set to 12 mm, which was considered sufficiently short not to breach the transverse foramen. The drill was directed from 20° to 25° medially so that the screw could purchase the relatively hard cancellous bone around the entry zone of the pedicle. The hole was tapped and a 4.5-mm-diameter × 12-mm screw was inserted. For LMS, 3.5-mm-diameter × 14-mm screws were inserted into the lateral mass of C3–6. The pullout strength of each screw was measured. After pullout testing of LMS, a drill was inserted into the screw hole and the superior cortex of the lateral mass was pried to cause a fracture through the screw hole, simulating intraoperative fracture of the lateral mass. After the procedure, PVFS for salvage (sPVFS) were inserted on the same side and pullout strength was measured.

RESULTS

The CT scans obtained after screw insertion revealed no sign of pedicle breaching, violation of the transverse foramen, or fracture of the lateral mass. A total of 69 screws were tested (23 PVFS, 23 LMS, and 23 sPVFS). One vertebra was not used because of a fracture that occurred while the specimen was prepared. The mean bone mineral density of the specimens was 0.29 ± 0.10 g/cm3. The mean pullout strength was 234 ± 114 N for PVFS, 158 ± 91 N for LMS, and 195 ± 125 N for sPVFS. The pullout strength for PVFS tended to be greater than that for LMS. However, the difference was not quite significant (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors introduce a novel fixation technique for the subaxial cervical spine. This study suggests that PVFS tend to provide stronger fixation than LMS for initial applications and fixation equal to LMS for salvage applications. If placement of LMS fails, PVFS can serve as a salvage fixation technique.

ABBREVIATIONS

BMD = bone mineral density; LMS = lateral mass screws; PS = pedicle screws; PVFS = paravertebral foramen screws; sPVFS = PVFS for salvage; vBMD = volumetric BMD.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    An HS, Gordin R, Renner K: Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 (10 Suppl):S548S551, 1991

  • 2

    Anderst WJ, Thorhauer ED, Lee JY, Donaldson WF, Kang JD: Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location. Spine J 11:659667, 2011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Aramomi M, Ishikawa T, Maki S: [Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine surgery.] J Spine Res 5:549, 2014 (Jpn)

  • 4

    Barrey C, Mertens P, Rumelhart C, Cotton F, Jund J, Perrin G: Biomechanical evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation: a comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl screw techniques. J Neurosurg 100 (3 Suppl Spine):268276, 2004

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D: Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 118:391398, 1996

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Choma TJ, Pfeiffer FM, Swope RW, Hirner JP: Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1628E1632, 2012

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Coe JD, Vaccaro AR, Dailey AT, Skolasky RL Jr, Sasso RC, Ludwig SC, et al.: Lateral mass screw fixation in the cervical spine: a systematic literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:21362143, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V: Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:22312239, 1993

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Heller JG, Estes BT, Zaouali M, Diop A: Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:13151321, 1996

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, Uchiyama S, Hara T, Washio T, et al.: Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:25042510, 1997

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hostin RA, Wu C, Perra JH, Polly DW, Akesen B, Wroblewski JM: A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:24152421, 2008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Ito Z, Higashino K, Kato S, Kim SS, Wong E, Yoshioka K, et al.: Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:8085, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward JC: Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 (3 Suppl):S56S63, 1991

  • 14

    Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, Marcu D: Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Spine J 6:667672, 2006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC: Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:977982, 1997

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kiner DW, Wybo CD, Sterba W, Yeni YN, Bartol SW, Vaidya R: Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:26182622, 2008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kowalski JM, Ludwig SC, Hutton WC, Heller JG: Cervical spine pedicle screws: a biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:28652867, 2000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kueny RA, Kolb JP, Lehmann W, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Huber G: Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing. Eur Spine J 23:21962202, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Lee TC: Complications of transpedicular reduction and stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine. J Formos Med Assoc 94:738741, 1995

  • 20

    Lovick DS, Ryken TC, Traynelis VC, Dexter F: Assessment of primary and salvage lateral mass screw insertion torque in a cadaveric model. J Spinal Disord 10:431435, 1997

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Madawi AA, Casey AT, Solanki GA, Tuite G, Veres R, Crockard HA: Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg 86:961968, 1997

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Mandel IM, Kambach BJ, Petersilge CA, Johnstone B, Yoo JU: Morphologic considerations of C2 isthmus dimensions for the placement of transarticular screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:15421547, 2000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Ohlin A, Karlsson M, Düppe H, Hasserius R, Redlund-Johnell I: Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:27742779, 1994

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Wakao N, Takeuchi M, Nishimura M, Riew KD, Kamiya M, Hirasawa A, et al.: Vertebral artery variations and osseous anomaly at the C1-2 level diagnosed by 3D CT angiography in normal subjects. Neuroradiology 56:843849, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Wichmann JL, Booz C, Wesarg S, Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Fischer S, et al.: Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength. Eur Radiol 25:17141720, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Wilke HJ, Kaiser D, Volkheimer D, Hackenbroch C, Püschel K, Rauschmann M: A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Eur Spine J 25:29192928, 2016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Wu JC, Huang WC, Chen YC, Shih YH, Cheng H: Stabilization of subaxial cervical spines by lateral mass screw fixation with modified Magerl’s technique. Surg Neurol 70 (Suppl 1):S25S33, 2008

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Furuya T, Sakuma T, Takahashi H, Kato K, et al.: Anomalous vertebral arteries in the extra- and intraosseous regions of the craniovertebral junction visualized by 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiography: analysis of 100 consecutive surgical cases and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1389E1397, 2012

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Yoshihara H, Passias PG, Errico TJ: Screw-related complications in the subaxial cervical spine with the use of lateral mass versus cervical pedicle screws: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 19:614623, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Zhang QH, Tan SH, Chou SM: Investigation of fixation screw pull-out strength on human spine. J Biomech 37:479485, 2004

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 436 436 70
Full Text Views 1745 170 6
PDF Downloads 2054 196 12
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0