The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion

Clinical article

Yakov Gologorsky M.D.1, John J. Knightly M.D.2, John H. Chi M.D., M.P.H.1, and Michael W. Groff M.D.1
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
  • | 2 Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Atlantic Neuroscience Institute, Morristown, New Jersey
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The rates of lumbar spinal fusion operations have increased dramatically over the past 2 decades, and several studies based on administrative databases such as the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) have suggested that the greatest rise is in the general categories of degenerative disc disease and disc herniation, neither of which is a well-accepted indication for lumbar fusion. The administrative databases classify cases with the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The ICD-9-CM discharge codes are not generated by surgeons but rather are assigned by trained hospital medical coders. It is unclear how accurately they capture the surgeon's indication for fusion. The authors sought to compare the ICD-9-CM code(s) assigned by the medical coder to the surgeon's indication based on a review of the medical chart.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of all lumbar fusions performed at our institution by the department of neurosurgery between 8/1/2011 and 8/31/2013. Based on the authors' review, the indication for fusion for each case was categorized as spondylolisthesis, deformity, tumor, infection, nonpathological fracture, pseudarthrosis, adjacent-level degeneration, stenosis, degenerative disc pathology, or disc herniation. These surgeon diagnoses were compared with the primary ICD-9-CM codes that were submitted to administrative databases.

Results

There were 178 lumbar fusion operations performed for 170 hospital admissions. There were 44 hospitalizations in which fusion was performed for tumor, infection, or nonpathological fracture; the remaining 126 were for degenerative diagnoses. For these degenerative cases, the primary ICD-9-CM diagnosis matched the surgeon's diagnosis in only 61 of 126 degenerative cases (48.4%). When both the primary and all secondary ICD-9-CM diagnoses were considered, the indication for fusion was identified in 100 of 126 cases (79.4%).

Conclusions

Characterizing indications for fusion based solely on primary ICD-9-CM codes extracted from large administrative databases does not accurately reflect the surgeon's indication. While these databases may accurately describe national rates of lumbar fusion surgery, the lack of fidelity in the source codes limits their role in accurately identifying indications for surgery. Studying relationships among indications, complications, and outcomes stratified solely by ICD-9-CM codes is not well founded.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

BMI = body mass index; DDD = degenerative disc disease; ICD-9-CM = International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; IRR = interrater reliability; MedPAR = Medicare Provider Analysis and Review; NIS = Nationwide Inpatient Sample; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; PVCR = posterior vertebral column resection; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Michael W. Groff, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115. email: mgroff@partners.org.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online October 17, 2014; DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131113.

  • 1

    Benesch C, , Witter DM Jr, , Wilder AL, , Duncan PW, , Samsa GP, & Matchar DB: Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Neurology 49:660664, 1997. (Erratum in Neurology 50: 306, 1998)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Carreon LY, , Djurasovic M, , Canan CE, , Burke LO, & Glassman SD: SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E804E808, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Cherkin DC, , Deyo RA, , Volinn E, & Loeser JD: Use of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to identify hospitalizations for mechanical low back problems in administrative databases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:817825, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Deyo RA, , Gray DT, , Kreuter W, , Mirza S, & Martin BI: United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:14411447, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Deyo RA, , Mirza SK, , Martin BI, , Kreuter W, , Goodman DC, & Jarvik JG: Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:12591265, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Deyo RA, , Nachemson A, & Mirza SK: Spinal-fusion surgery—the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350:722726, 2004

  • 7

    Faciszewski T: Spine update. Administrative databases in spine research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:12701275, 1997

  • 8

    Faciszewski T, , Broste SK, & Fardon D: Quality of data regarding diagnoses of spinal disorders in administrative databases. A multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:14811488, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Faciszewski T, , Jensen R, & Berg RL: Procedural coding of spinal surgeries (CPT-4 versus ICD-9-CM) and decisions regarding standards: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:502507, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Fischgrund JS, , Mackay M, , Herkowitz HN, , Brower R, , Montgomery DM, & Kurz LT: 1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:28072812, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Fritzell P, , Hägg O, , Jonsson D, & Nordwall A: Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:421434, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Fritzell P, , Hägg O, , Wessberg P, & Nordwall A: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:25212534, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Glassman SD, , Carreon LY, , Djurasovic M, , Dimar JR, , Johnson JR, & Puno RM, et al. : Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J 9:1321, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Hagen EM, , Rekand T, , Gilhus NE, & Gronning M: Diagnostic coding accuracy for traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 47:367371, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Hertzer NR: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample may contain inaccurate data for carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 55:263266, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Martin BI, , Mirza SK, , Franklin GM, , Lurie JD, , MacKenzie TA, & Deyo RA: Hospital and surgeon variation in complications and repeat surgery following incident lumbar fusion for common degenerative diagnoses. Health Serv Res 48:125, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    O'Malley KJ, , Cook KF, , Price MD, , Wildes KR, , Hurdle JF, & Ashton CM: Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res 40:16201639, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Wang MC, , Laud PW, , Macias M, & Nattinger AB: Strengths and limitations of International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification codes in defining cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E38E44, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Weinstein JN, , Lurie JD, , Tosteson TD, , Hanscom B, , Tosteson AN, & Blood EA, et al. : Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 356:22572270, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 609 366 40
Full Text Views 721 45 12
PDF Downloads 348 32 11
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0