Independent assessment of a new pedicle probe and its ability to detect pedicle breach: a cadaveric study

Laboratory investigation

Phillip T. Guillen Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Search for other papers by Phillip T. Guillen in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Ryan G. Knopper School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California

Search for other papers by Ryan G. Knopper in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 B.S.
,
Jared Kroger School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California

Search for other papers by Jared Kroger in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 B.S.
,
Nathaniel D. Wycliffe Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, and

Search for other papers by Nathaniel D. Wycliffe in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Olumide A. Danisa Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Search for other papers by Olumide A. Danisa in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
, and
Wayne K. Cheng Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Search for other papers by Wayne K. Cheng in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $384.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object

The authors undertook an independent, non–industry funded cadaveric study to evaluate the efficacy of a pedicle-probing device, which uses impedance measurement to warn of impending and actual pedicle screw breach.

Methods

A previously validated fresh-frozen cadaver model (saline-soaked spine) was used. Individuals at 3 levels of training (attending spine surgeon, orthopedic surgery resident, and medical student) used a cannulated pedicle-probing device to cannulate each of the levels between T-2 and S-1. Each pedicle was cannulated freehand using 2 approaches: 1) a standard trajectory through the middle of the pedicle, and 2) a medial trajectory aimed to breach the medial wall of the pedicle. A 16-slice helical CT scanner was used. The images were interpreted and analyzed by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and a neuroradiologist.

Results

The sensitivity of the pedicle probe to detect impending breach or breach of 4 mm or less was 90.06%. The sensitivity in detecting medial wall breach was 95.8%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%. The device detected medial breach more often than lateral breach.

Conclusions

This study showed that this pedicle-probing device could reasonably be used to detect impending breach and actual breach of 4 mm or less. Medial breach was detected better than lateral breach. Use of the pedicle probe may improve patient safety.

Abbreviation used in this paper:

PPV = positive predictive value.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Bai YS, , Niu YF, , Chen ZQ, , Zhu XD, , Gabriel LK, & Wong HK, et al.: Comparison of the pedicle screws placement between electronic conductivity device and normal pedicle finder in posterior surgery of scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:316320, 2013

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Davne SH, & Myers DL: Complications of lumbar spinal fusion with transpedicular instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:6 Suppl S184S189, 1992

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Esses SI, , Sachs BL, & Dreyzin V: Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:22312239, 1993

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Gelalis ID, , Paschos NK, , Pakos EE, , Politis AN, , Arnaoutoglou CM, & Karageorgos AC, et al.: Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21:247255, 2012

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Grauer JN, , Vaccaro AR, , Brusovanik G, , Girardi FP, , Silveri CP, & Cammisa FP, et al.: Evaluation of a novel pedicle probe for the placement of thoracic and lumbosacral pedicle screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:492497, 2004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Kim YJ, , Lenke LG, , Bridwell KH, , Cho YS, & Riew KD: Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:333342, 2004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Laine T, , Lund T, , Ylikoski M, , Lohikoski J, & Schlenzka D: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235240, 2000

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Laine T, , Mäkitalo K, , Schlenzka D, , Tallroth K, , Poussa M, & Alho A: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 6:402405, 1997

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Learch TJ, , Massie JB, , Pathria MN, , Ahlgren BA, & Garfin SR: Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: a proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:767773, 2004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Parker SL, , Amin AG, , Farber SH, , McGirt MJ, , Sciubba DM, & Wolinsky JP, et al.: Ability of electromyographic monitoring to determine the presence of malpositioned pedicle screws in the lumbosacral spine: analysis of 2450 consecutively placed screws. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:130135, 2011

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Raynor BL, , Lenke LG, , Bridwell KH, , Taylor BA, & Padberg AM: Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of 4857 screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:26732678, 2007

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Sagi HC, , Manos R, , Benz R, , Ordway NR, & Connolly PJ: Electromagnetic field-based image-guided spine surgery part one: results of a cadaveric study evaluating lumbar pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:20132018, 2003

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Vaccaro AR, , Rizzolo SJ, , Balderston RA, , Allardyce TJ, , Garfin SR, & Dolinskas C, et al.: Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:12001206, 1995

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Zeiller SC, , Lee J, , Lim M, & Vaccaro AR: Posterior thoracic segmental pedicle screw instrumentation: evolving methods of safe and effective placement. Neurol India 53:458465, 2005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 783 207 10
Full Text Views 378 17 2
PDF Downloads 314 29 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0