Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion for low-back pain

Restricted access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address reprint requests to: Daniel K. Resnick, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792. email: Resnick@neurosurg.wisc.edu.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1.

    Andersen TChristensen FBHansen ESet al: Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 12:3933992003Andersen T Christensen FB Hansen ES et al: Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 12:393–399 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Bernhardt MSwartz DEClothiaux PLet al: Posterolateral lumbar and lumbosacral fusion with and without pedicle screw internal fixation. Clin Orthop 284:1091151992Bernhardt M Swartz DE Clothiaux PL et al: Posterolateral lumbar and lumbosacral fusion with and without pedicle screw internal fixation. Clin Orthop 284:109–115 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Bjarke Christensen FStender Hansen ELaursen Met al: Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine 27:126912772002Bjarke Christensen F Stender Hansen E Laursen M et al: Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine 27:1269–1277 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Bridwell KHSedgewick TAO'Brien MFet al: The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:4614721993Bridwell KH Sedgewick TA O'Brien MF et al: The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:461–472 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Deyo RCherkin DConrad Det al: Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Ann Rev Pub Health 12:1411561991Deyo R Cherkin D Conrad D et al: Cost controversy crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Ann Rev Pub Health 12:141–156 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Fischgrund JSMackay MHerkowitz HNet al: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 22:280728121997Fischgrund JS Mackay M Herkowitz HN et al: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 22:2807–2812 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    France JCYaszemski MJLauerman WCet al: A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 24:5535601999France JC Yaszemski MJ Lauerman WC et al: A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 24:553–560 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Fritzell PHagg OWessberg Pet al: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:252125342001Fritzell P Hagg O Wessberg P et al: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2534 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Fritzell PHagg OWessberg Pet al: Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 27:113111412002Fritzell P Hagg O Wessberg P et al: Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 27:1131–1141 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Grubb SALipscomb HJ: Results of lumbosacral fusion for degenerative disc disease with and without instrumentation. Two-to five-year follow-up. Spine 17:3493551992Grubb SA Lipscomb HJ: Results of lumbosacral fusion for degenerative disc disease with and without instrumentation. Two-to five-year follow-up. Spine 17:349–355 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Jager MSeller KRaab Pet al: Clinical outcome in monosegmental fusion of degenerative lumbar instabilities: instrumented versus non-instrumented. Med Sci Monit 9:CR324CR3272003Jager M Seller K Raab P et al: Clinical outcome in monosegmental fusion of degenerative lumbar instabilities: instrumented versus non-instrumented. Med Sci Monit 9:CR324–CR327 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Katz JN: Lumbar spinal fusion: surgical rates, costs, and complications. Spine 20 (24 Suppl):S78S831995Katz JN: Lumbar spinal fusion: surgical rates costs and complications. Spine 20 (24 Suppl):S78–S83 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Katz JNLipson SJLew RAet al: Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 22:112311311997Katz JN Lipson SJ Lew RA et al: Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection costs and surgical outcomes. Spine 22:1123–1131 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Lorenz MZindrick MRSchwaegler Pet al: A comparison of single level fusions with and without hardware. Spine 16:S455S4581991Lorenz M Zindrick MR Schwaegler P et al: A comparison of single level fusions with and without hardware. Spine 16:S455–S458 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Mardjetko SMConnolly PJShott S: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 19 (20 Suppl):S2256S22651994Mardjetko SM Connolly PJ Shott S: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 19 (20 Suppl):S2256–S2265 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Schwab FJNazarian DGMahmud Fet al: Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 20:202320281995Schwab FJ Nazarian DG Mahmud F et al: Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 20:2023–2028 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Thomsen KChristensen FBEiskjaer SPet al: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine 22:281328221997Thomsen K Christensen FB Eiskjaer SP et al: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective randomized clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Zdeblick TA: A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 18:9839911993Zdeblick TA: A prospective randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 18:983–991 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 268 268 42
Full Text Views 62 54 2
PDF Downloads 111 60 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar