Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion

Restricted access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address reprint requests to: Daniel K. Resnick, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792. email: Resnick@neurosurg.wisc.edu.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1.

    Barnes BRodts GEMcLaughlin MRet al: Threaded cortical bone dowels for lumbar interbody fusion: over 1-year mean follow up in 28 patients. J Neurosurg 95:142001Barnes B Rodts GE McLaughlin MR et al: Threaded cortical bone dowels for lumbar interbody fusion: over 1-year mean follow up in 28 patients. J Neurosurg 95:1–4 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Branch CLBranch CL Jr: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the keystone graft: technique and results. Surg Neurol 27:4494541987Branch CL Branch CL Jr: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the keystone graft: technique and results. Surg Neurol 27:449–454 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Brantigan JWSteffee AD: A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:210621071993Brantigan JW Steffee AD: A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:2106–2107 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Brantigan JWSteffee ADLewis MLet al: Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 25:143714462000Brantigan JW Steffee AD Lewis ML et al: Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 25:1437–1446 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Burkus JK: Intervertebral fixation: clinical results with anterior cages. Orthop Clin North Am 33:3493572002Burkus JK: Intervertebral fixation: clinical results with anterior cages. Orthop Clin North Am 33:349–357 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Burkus JKDorchak JDSanders DL: Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2. Spine 28:3723772003Burkus JK Dorchak JD Sanders DL: Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2. Spine 28:372–377 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Burkus JKGornet MFDickman CAet al: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:3373492002Burkus JK Gornet MF Dickman CA et al: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:337–349 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Burkus JKTransfeldt EEKitchel SHet al: Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 27:239624082002Burkus JK Transfeldt EE Kitchel SH et al: Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 27:2396–2408 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Chitnavis BBarbagallo GSelway Ret al: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision disc surgery: review of 50 cases in which carbon fiber cages were implanted. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 95:1901952001Chitnavis B Barbagallo G Selway R et al: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision disc surgery: review of 50 cases in which carbon fiber cages were implanted. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 95:190–195 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Christensen FBHansen ESEiskjaer SPet al: Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 27:267426832002Christensen FB Hansen ES Eiskjaer SP et al: Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 27:2674–2683 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    DeBerard MSColledge ALMasters KSet al: Outcomes of posterolateral versus BAK titanium cage interbody lumbar fusion in injured workers: a retrospective cohort study. J South Orthop Assoc 11:1571662002DeBerard MS Colledge AL Masters KS et al: Outcomes of posterolateral versus BAK titanium cage interbody lumbar fusion in injured workers: a retrospective cohort study. J South Orthop Assoc 11:157–166 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Fritzell PHagg ONordwall A: Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12:1781892003Fritzell P Hagg O Nordwall A: Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12:178–189 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Fritzell PHagg OWessberg Pet al: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:252125342001Fritzell P Hagg O Wessberg P et al: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2534 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Fritzell PHagg OWessberg Pet al: Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:113111412002Fritzell P Hagg O Wessberg P et al: Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:1131–1141 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Geerdes BPGeukers CWvan Erp WF: Laparoscopic spinal fusion of L4-l5 and L5—S1. Surg Endosc 15:130813122001Geerdes BP Geukers CW van Erp WF: Laparoscopic spinal fusion of L4-l5 and L5—S1. Surg Endosc 15:1308–1312 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Gill KBlumenthal SL: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A 2-year follow-up of 238 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251:1081101993Gill K Blumenthal SL: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A 2-year follow-up of 238 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251:108–110 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Greenough CGPeterson MDHadlow Set al: Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion. Spine 23:4794861998Greenough CG Peterson MD Hadlow S et al: Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion. Spine 23:479–486 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Hacker RJ: Comparison of interbody fusion approaches for disabling low back pain. Spine 22:6606661997Hacker RJ: Comparison of interbody fusion approaches for disabling low back pain. Spine 22:660–666 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Hee HTCastro FP JrMajd MEet al: Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14:5335402001Hee HT Castro FP Jr Majd ME et al: Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14:533–540 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Humphreys SCHodges SDPatwardhan AGet al: Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:5675712001Humphreys SC Hodges SD Patwardhan AG et al: Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:567–571 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Hutter CG: Spinal stenosis and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:1031141985Hutter CG: Spinal stenosis and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:103–114 1985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lin PM: Radiographic evidence of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with an emphasis on computed tomographic scanning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 242:1581631989Lin PM: Radiographic evidence of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with an emphasis on computed tomographic scanning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 242:158–163 1989

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Lin PM: A technical modification of Cloward's posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 1:1181241977Lin PM: A technical modification of Cloward's posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 1:118–124 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Lin PMCautilli RAJoyce MF: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 180:1541681983Lin PM Cautilli RA Joyce MF: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 180:154–168 1983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Linson MAWilliams H: Anterior and combined anteroposterior fusion for lumbar disc pain. A preliminary study. Spine 16:1431451991Linson MA Williams H: Anterior and combined anteroposterior fusion for lumbar disc pain. A preliminary study. Spine 16:143–145 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Ma GW: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with specialized instruments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:57631985Ma GW: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with specialized instruments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:57–63 1985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Pradhan BBNassar JADelamarter RBet al: Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:3553612002Pradhan BB Nassar JA Delamarter RB et al: Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:355–361 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Regan JJYuan HMcAfee PC: Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 24:4024111999Regan JJ Yuan H McAfee PC: Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine 24:402–411 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Rompe JDEysel PHopf C: Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 4:2312371995Rompe JD Eysel P Hopf C: Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 4:231–237 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Schofferman JSlosar PReynolds Jet al: A prospective randomized comparison of 270 degrees fusions to 360 degrees fusions (circumferential fusions). Spine 26:E207E2122001Schofferman J Slosar P Reynolds J et al: A prospective randomized comparison of 270 degrees fusions to 360 degrees fusions (circumferential fusions). Spine 26:E207–E212 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Simmons JW: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:85891985Simmons JW: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:85–89 1985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Slosar PJReynolds JBSchofferman Jet al: Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 25:7227262000Slosar PJ Reynolds JB Schofferman J et al: Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 25:722–726 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Vamvanij VFredrickson BEThorpe JMet al: Surgical treatment of internal disc disruption: an outcome study of four fusion techniques. J Spinal Disord 11:3753821998Vamvanij V Fredrickson BE Thorpe JM et al: Surgical treatment of internal disc disruption: an outcome study of four fusion techniques. J Spinal Disord 11:375–382 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Yashiro KHomma THokari Yet al: The Steffee variable screw placement system using different methods of bone grafting. Spine 16:132913341991Yashiro K Homma T Hokari Y et al: The Steffee variable screw placement system using different methods of bone grafting. Spine 16:1329–1334 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Zdeblick TA: A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 18:9839911993Zdeblick TA: A prospective randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 18:983–991 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Zdeblick TADavid SM: A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-l5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 25:268226872000Zdeblick TA David SM: A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-l5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 25:2682–2687 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Zhao JWang XHou Tet al: One versus two BAK fusion cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to L4-l5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a randomized, controlled prospective study in 25 patients with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine 27:275327572002Zhao J Wang X Hou T et al: One versus two BAK fusion cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to L4-l5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled prospective study in 25 patients with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine 27:2753–2757 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 171 170 42
Full Text Views 79 61 3
PDF Downloads 122 79 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar