Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, University of California at Los Angeles, California; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Bone and Joint Clinic of Houston, Texas; and Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address reprint requests to: Daniel K. Resnick, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792. email: Resnick@neurosurg.wisc.edu.
  • 1.

    Christensen FB, , Hansen ES, & Eiskjaer SP, et al. : Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 27:26742683, 2002 Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, et al: Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 27:2674–2683, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Christensen FB, , Hansen ES, & Laursen M, et al. : Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine 27:12691277, 2002 Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Laursen M, et al: Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine 27:1269–1277, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Davis H: Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine 19:11171124, 1994 Davis H: Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine 19:1117–1124, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Deyo RA, , Cherkin D, & Conrad D, et al. : Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 12:141156, 1991 Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, et al: Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 12:141–156, 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Deyo RA, , Cherkin D, & Loeser JD, et al. : Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536543, 1992 Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Loeser JD, et al: Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536–543, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Deyo RA, , Ciol MA, & Cherkin DC, et al. : Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine 18:14631470, 1993 Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, et al: Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine 18:1463–1470, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Franklin GM, , Haug J, & Heyer NJ, et al. : Outcome of lumbar fusion in Washington State workers' compensation. Spine 19:18971904, 1994 Franklin GM, Haug J, Heyer NJ, et al: Outcome of lumbar fusion in Washington State workers' compensation. Spine 19:1897–1904, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Fritzell P, , Hagg O, & Wessberg P, et al. : 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:25212534, 2001 Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al: 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2534, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Katz JN: Lumbar spinal fusion. Surgical rates, costs, and complications. Spine 20 (24 Suppl):S78S83, 1995 Katz JN: Lumbar spinal fusion. Surgical rates, costs, and complications. Spine 20 (24 Suppl):S78–S83, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Katz JN, , Lipson SJ, & Lew RA, et al. : Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 22:11231131, 1997 Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, et al: Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 22:1123–1131, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Kuntz KM, , Snider RK, & Weinstein JN, et al. : Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 25:11321139, 2000 Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN, et al: Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 25:1132–1139, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Malter AD, , McNeney B, & Loeser JD, et al. : 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery. Spine 23:814820, 1998 Malter AD, McNeney B, Loeser JD, et al: 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery. Spine 23:814–820, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Moller H, & Hedlund R: Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis—a prospective, randomized study: part 1. Spine 25:17111715, 2000 Moller H, Hedlund R: Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis—a prospective, randomized study: part 1. Spine 25:1711–1715, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Slosar PJ, , Reynolds JB, & Schofferman J, et al. : Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 25:722726, 2000 Slosar PJ, Reynolds JB, Schofferman J, et al: Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 25:722–726, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Tunturi T, , Niemela P, & Laurinkari J, et al. : Cost-benefit analysis of posterior fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Acta Orthop Scand 50:427432, 1979 Tunturi T, Niemela P, Laurinkari J, et al: Cost-benefit analysis of posterior fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Acta Orthop Scand 50:427–432, 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 412 66 2
Full Text Views 65 5 0
PDF Downloads 112 4 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0