Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition that leads to significant disability, particularly in the elderly. Current therapeutic modalities for LSS have certain drawbacks when applied to this patient population. The object of this study was to define the 12-month postoperative outcomes and complications of pedicle-lengthening osteotomies for symptomatic LSS.
A prospective, single-treatment clinical pilot study was conducted. A cohort of 19 patients (mean age 60.9 years) with symptomatic LSS was treated by pedicle-lengthening osteotomy procedures at 1 or 2 levels. All patients had symptoms of neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy secondary to LSS and had not improved after a minimum 6-month course of nonoperative treatment. Eleven patients had a Meyerding Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis in addition to LSS. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and a visual analog scale (VAS). Procedural variables, neurological outcomes, adverse events, and radiological imaging (plain radiographs and CT scans) were collected at the 1.5-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month time points.
The pedicle-lengthening osteotomies were performed through percutaneous approaches with minimal blood loss in all cases. There were no operative complications. Four adverse events occurred during the follow-up period. Clinically, significant improvement was observed in the mean values of each of the outcome scales (comparing preoperative and 12-month values): ODI scores improved from 52.3 to 28.1 (p < 0.0001); the ZCQ physical function domain improved from 2.7 to 1.8 (p = 0.0021); the SF-12 physical component scale improved from 27.0 to 37.9 (p = 0.0024); and the VAS score for leg pain while standing improved from 7.2 to 2.7 (p < 0.0001). Imaging studies, reviewed by an independent radiologist, showed no evidence of device subsidence, migration, breakage, or heterotopic ossification. Thin-slice CT documented healing of the osteotomy site in all patients at the 6-month time point and an increase in the mean cross-sectional area of the spinal canal of 115%.
Treatment of patients with symptomatic LSS with a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy procedure provided substantial enlargement of the area of the spinal canal and favorable clinical results for both disease-specific and non–disease-specific outcome measures at the 12-month time point. Future studies are needed to compare this technique to alternative therapies for lumbar stenosis.
Address correspondence to: D. Greg Anderson, M.D., Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University/Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107. email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online February 1, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12402.
AtlasSJKellerRBWuYADeyoRASingerDE: Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)30:936–9432005
LeeMJBransfordRJBellabarbaCChapmanJRCohenAMHarringtonRM: The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)35:1789–17932010
MannionRJGuilfoyleMREfendyJNowitzkeAMLaingRJWoodMJ: Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: long-term outcome, morbidity, and the learning curve from the first 50 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech25:47–512012
PrattRKFairbankJCVirrA: The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)27:84–912002
TaiCLHsiehPHChenWPChenLHChenWJLaiPL: Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome— an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord9:842008
WeinsteinJNLurieJDTostesonTDZhaoWBloodEATostesonANA: Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Fouryear results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am91:1295–13042009
WeinsteinJNTostesonTDLurieJDTostesonABloodEAHerkowitzH: Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)35:1329–13382010
YamazakiKYoshidaSItoTTobaTKatoSShimamuraT: Postoperative outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after fenestration: correlation with changes in intradural and extradural tube on magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)10:136–1432002
YoshimotoMTakebayashiTKawaguchiSTsudaHIdaKWadaT: Minimally invasive technique for decompression of lumbar foraminal stenosis using a spinal microendoscope: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg54:142–1462011
ZuchermanJFHsuKYHartjenCAMehalicTFImplicitoDAMartinMJ: A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)30:1351–13582005
ZuchermanJFHsuKYHartjenCAMehalicTFImplicitoDAMartinMJ: A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J13:22–312004