Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site

Presented at the 2012 Joint Spine Section Meeting 

View More View Less
  • 1 Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates;
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Carolinas Medical Center;
  • 3 Charlotte Radiology, P.A.; and
  • 4 Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

The results of 2 separate prospective, randomized, US FDA Investigational Device Exemption pivotal trials (Bryan Disc and Kineflex|C) from a single investigational site were combined to evaluate outcomes at long-term follow-up. The primary clinical outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS), and neurological examination. Patients were randomized to receive cervical TDR in 2 separate prospective, randomized studies using the Bryan Disc or Kineflex|C cervical artificial disc compared with ACDF using structural allograft and an anterior plate. Patients were evaluated preoperatively; at 6 weeks; at 3, 6, and 12 months; and then yearly for a minimum of 48 months. Plain radiographs were obtained at each study visit.

Results

A total of 74 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the cervical TDR (n = 41) or ACDF (n = 33) group. A total of 63 patients (86%) completed a minimum of 4 years follow-up. Average follow-up was 6 years (72 months) with a range from 48 to 108 months. In both the cervical TDR and ACDF groups, mean NDI scores improved significantly by 6 weeks after surgery and remained significantly improved throughout the minimum 48-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median VAS pain scores improved significantly by 6 weeks and remained significantly improved throughout the minimum 48-month follow-up (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in mean NDI or median VAS scores. The range of motion (ROM) in the cervical TDR group remained significantly greater than the preoperative mean, whereas the ROM in the ACDF group was significantly reduced from the preoperative mean. There was significantly greater ROM in the cervical TDR group compared with the ACDF group. There were 3 reoperations (7.3%) at index or adjacent levels in the cervical TDR group; all were cervical laminoforaminotomies. There were 2 adjacent-level reoperations in the cervical TDR group (4.9%). There was 1 reoperation (3.0%) in the ACDF group at an index or adjacent level (a second ACDF at the adjacent level). There was no statistically significant difference in overall reoperation rate or adjacent-level reoperation rate between groups.

Conclusions

Both cervical TDR and ACDF groups showed excellent clinical outcomes that were maintained over long-term follow-up. Both groups showed low index-level and adjacent-level reoperation rates. Both cervical TDR and ACDF appear to be viable options for the treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Dom Coric, M.D., Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, 225 Baldwin Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina 28207. email: dom@cnsa.com.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online November 9, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555.

  • 1

    Adamson TE: Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases. J Neurosurg 95:1 Suppl 5157, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Aronson N, , Filtzer DL, & Bagan M: Anterior cervical fusion by the Smith-Robinson approach. J Neurosurg 29:396404, 1968

  • 3

    Baba H, , Furusawa N, , Imura S, , Kawahara N, , Tsuchiya H, & Tomita K: Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:21672173, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bailey RW, & Badgley CE: Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42:565594, 1960

  • 5

    Bartels R, & Donk R: Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery 57:E194, 2005

  • 6

    Bartels RH, , Donk R, & Verbeek AL: No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery 66:11531160, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Beaurain J, , Bernard P, , Dufour T, , Fuentes JM, , Hovorka I, & Huppert J, : Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:841850, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Berry MR, , Peterson BG, & Alander DH: A granulomatous mass surrounding a Maverick total disc replacement causing iliac vein occlusion and spinal stenosis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:12421245, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Bertagnoli R, , Yue J, , Pfeiffer F, , Fenk-Mayer A, , Lawrence J, & Kershaw T, : Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403410, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Bohlman HH, , Emery SE, , Goodfellow DB, & Jones PK: Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:12981307, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Burkus JK, , Haid RW, , Traynelis VC, & Mummaneni PV: Longterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:308318, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Cavanaugh DA, , Nunley PD, , Kerr EJ III, , Werner DJ, & Jawahar A: Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E262E265, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Chang UK, , Kim DH, , Lee MC, , Willenberg R, , Kim SH, & Lim J: Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7:3339, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Cloward RB: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 15:602617, 1958

  • 15

    Coric D, & Adamson T: Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic laminoforaminotomy. Neurosurg Focus 25:2 E2, 2008

  • 16

    Coric D, , Branch CL Jr, & Jenkins JD: Revision of anterior cervical pseudoarthrosis with anterior allograft fusion and plating. J Neurosurg 86:969974, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Coric D, , Cassis J, , Carew J, & Boltes MO: Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:715721, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Coric D, , Finger F, & Boltes P: The Bryan Cervical Disc prospective, randomized, controlled study: early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine 41:3135, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Coric D, , Nunley P, , Guyer RD, , Musante D, , Carmody C, & Gordon C, : Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348358, 2011. (Erratum in J Neurosurg Spine 16:322, 2012)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Cummins B, , Robertson J, & Gill S: Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg 88:943948, 1998

  • 21

    DiAngelo DJ, , Roberston JT, , Metcalf NH, , McVay BJ, & Davis RC: Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:314323, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Dmitriev AE, , Cunningham BW, , Hu N, , Sell G, , Vigna F, & McAfee PC: Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:11651172, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Eck JC, , Humphreys SC, , Lim TH, , Jeong ST, , Kim JG, & Hodges SD, : Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:24312434, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Emery SE, , Bohlman HH, , Bolesta MJ, & Jones PK: Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:941951, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Fountas KN, , Kapsalaki EZ, , Nikolakakos LG, , Smisson HF, , Johnston KW, & Grigorian AA, : Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:23102317, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Fraser JF, & Härtl R: Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 6:298303, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Garrido BJ, , Taha TA, & Sasso RC: Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:367371, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Goffin J, , Casey A, , Kehr P, , Liebig K, , Lind B, & Logroscino C, : Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51:840847, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Goffin J, , Geusens E, , Vantomme N, , Quintens E, , Waerzeggers Y, & Depreitere B, : Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:7985, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Goffin J, , Van Calenbergh F, , van Loon J, , Casey A, , Kehr P, & Liebig KE, : Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:26732678, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Gore DR, & Sepic SB: Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:667671, 1984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Heller JG, , Sasso RC, , Papadopoulos SM, , Anderson PA, , Fessler RG, & Hacker RJ, : Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:101107, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Hilibrand A, & Robbins M: Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?. Spine J 4:6 Suppl 190S194S, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Hilibrand AS, , Carlson GD, , Palumbo MA, , Jones PK, & Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519528, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Hunter LY, , Braunstein EM, & Bailey RW: Radiographic changes following anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5:399401, 1980

  • 36

    Ishihara H, , Kanamori M, , Kawaguchi Y, , Nakamura H, & Kimura T: Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 4:624628, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Jawahar A, , Cavanaugh DA, , Kerr EJ III, , Birdsong EM, & Nunley PD: Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials. Spine J 10:10431048, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Kim SW, , Limson MA, , Kim SB, , Arbatin JJ, , Chang KY, & Park MS, : Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 18:218231, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Kowalczyk I, , Lazaro BC, , Fink M, , Rabin D, & Duggal N: Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:630635, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Kulkarni V, , Rajshekhar V, & Raghuram L: Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. J Neurosurg 100:1 Suppl Spine 26, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Lee SE, , Chung CK, & Jahng TA: Early development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:3136, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Leung C, , Casey AT, , Goffin J, , Kehr P, , Liebig K, & Lind B, : Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 57:759763, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Matsunaga S, , Kabayama S, , Yamamoto T, , Yone K, , Sakou T, & Nakanishi K: Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:670675, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    McAfee PC, , Cunningham BW, , Devine J, , Williams E, & Yu-Yahiro J: Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:384389, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Mehren C, , Suchomel P, , Grochulla F, , Barsa P, , Sourkova P, & Hradil J, : Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:28022806, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Mummaneni P, , Burkus J, , Haid R, , Traynelis V, & Zdeblick T: Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198200, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Mummaneni P, & Haid R: The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2:155159, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Murrey D, , Janssen M, , Delamarter R, , Goldstein J, , Zigler J, & Tay B, : Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275286, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Park JB, , Cho YS, & Riew KD: Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:558563, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    Parkinson JF, , Sekhon LH, & Riew KD: Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2:377380, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    Pickett GE, , Sekhon LH, , Sears WR, & Duggal N: Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:98105, 2006

  • 52

    Pospiech J, , Stolke D, , Wilke H, & Claes L: Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 44:379385, 1999

  • 53

    Puttlitz CM, , Rousseau MA, , Xu Z, , Hu S, , Tay BK, & Lotz JC: Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:28092814, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    Rabin D, , Bertagnoli R, , Wharton N, , Pickett GE, & Duggal N: Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C. Spine J 9:128133, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    Reitman CA, , Hipp JA, , Nguyen L, & Esses SI: Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E221E226, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    Robertson JT, , Papadopoulos SM, & Traynelis VC: Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 3:417423, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Sears WR, , Duggal N, , Sekhon LH, & Williamson OD: Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis— contributing factors. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:111117, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58

    Sekhon LHS, , Sears W, & Duggal N: Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 3:335341, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    Smith GW, & Robinson RA: The treatment of certain cervicalspine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A:607624, 1958

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60

    Suchomel P, , Jurák L, , Benes V III, , Brabec R, , Bradác O, & Elgawhary S: Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 19:307315, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61

    Tu TH, , Wu JC, , Fay LY, , Ko CC, , Huang WC, & Cheng H: Vertebral body split fracture after a single-level cervical total disc replacement. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 16:231235, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62

    Upadhyaya CD, , Wu JC, , Trost G, , Haid RW, , Traynelis VC, & Tay B, : Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:216228, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    Wang JC, , McDonough PW, , Endow K, , Kanim LE, & Delamarter RB: The effect of cervical plating on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord 12:467471, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64

    Weinhoffer SL, , Guyer RD, , Herbert M, & Griffith SL: Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:526531, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    Wigfield C, , Gill S, , Nelson R, , Langdon I, , Metcalf N, & Robertson J: Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 96:1 Suppl 1721, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    Wigfield CC, , Skrzypiec D, , Jackowski A, & Adams MA: Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:441449, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67

    Yue WM, , Brodner W, & Highland TR: Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:21382144, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68

    Zechmeister I, , Winkler R, & Mad P: Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 20:177184, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 678 229 25
Full Text Views 193 35 5
PDF Downloads 201 24 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0