Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index that predict improvement after lumbar fusion

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Clinical studies use both disease-specific and generic health outcomes measures. Disease-specific measures focus on health domains most relevant to the clinical population, while generic measures assess overall health-related quality of life. There is little information about which domains of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) are most important in determining improvement in overall health-related quality of life, as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), after lumbar spinal fusion. The objective of the study is to determine which clinical elements assessed by the ODI most influence improvement of overall health-related quality of life.

Methods

A single tertiary spine center database was used to identify patients undergoing lumbar fusion for standard degenerative indications. Patients with complete preoperative and 2-year outcomes measures were included. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between improvement in each item of the ODI with improvement in the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) score, as well as achievement of the SF-36 PCS minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Multivariate regression modeling was used to examine which items of the ODI best predicted achievement for the SF-36 PCS MCID. The effect size and standardized response mean were calculated for each of the items of the ODI.

Results

A total of 1104 patients met inclusion criteria (674 female and 430 male patients). The mean age at surgery was 57 years. All items of the ODI showed significant correlations with the change in SF-36 PCS score and achievement of MCID for the SF-36 PCS, but only pain intensity, walking, and social life had r values > 0.4 reflecting moderate correlation. These 3 variables were also the dimensions that were independent predictors of the SF-36 PCS, and they were the only dimensions that had effect sizes and standardized response means that were moderate to large.

Conclusions

Of the health dimensions measured by the ODI, pain intensity, walking, and social life best predicted improvement in overall health-related quality of life, as measured using the SF-36 PCS.

Abbreviations used in this paper:MCID = minimum clinically important difference; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PCS = physical component summary; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Leah Carreon, M.D., M.Sc., 210 East Gray Street, #900, Louisville, Kentucky 40202. email: leah.carreon@nortonhealthcare.org.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online September 21, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.8.SPINE12614.

  • 1

    Bombardier C: Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:31003103, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences ed 2 Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988

  • 3

    Copay AG, , Glassman SD, , Subach BR, , Berven S, , Schuler TC, & Carreon LY: Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968974, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Fairbank JCT, & Pynsent PB: The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:29402952, 2000

  • 5

    Glassman S, , Gornet MF, , Branch C, , Polly D Jr, , Peloza J, & Schwender JD, : MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:2126, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Glassman SD, & Branch CL Jr: Evidence-based medicine: raising the bar. Spine J 7:513515, 2007

  • 7

    Glassman SD, , Carreon LY, , Djurasovic M, , Dimar JR, , Johnson JR, & Puno RM, : Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. Spine J 9:1321, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Guyatt G, , Walter S, & Norman G: Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40:171178, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Jensen MP, , Turner JA, & Romano JM: Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. J Consult Clin Psychol 62:172179, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Liang MH, , Larson MG, , Cullen KE, & Schwartz JA: Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 28:542547, 1985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    McCaffery M, & Beebe A: Pain: Clinical Manual for Nursing Practice ed 2 Baltimore, V.V. Mosby, 1993

  • 12

    Patrick DL, & Deyo RA: Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 27:3 Suppl S217S232, 1989

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Ware JE, , Kosinski M, & Keller SK: SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual Boston, The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics