Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers

Laboratory investigation

Restricted access


In the surgical treatment of spinal deformities, the importance of restoring lumbar lordosis is well recognized. Smith-Petersen osteotomies (SPOs) yield approximately 10° of lordosis per level, whereas pedicle subtraction osteotomies result in as much as 30° increased lumbar lordosis. Recently, selective release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) and placement of lordotic interbody grafts using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach (XLIF) has been performed as an attempt to increase lumbar lordosis while avoiding the morbidity of osteotomy. The objective of the present study was to measure the effect of the selective release of the ALL and varying degrees of lordotic implants placed using the XLIF approach on segmental lumbar lordosis in cadaveric specimens between L-1 and L-5.


Nine adult fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were placed in the lateral decubitus position. Lateral radiographs were obtained at baseline and after 4 interventions at each level as follows: 1) placement of a standard 10° lordotic cage, 2) ALL release and placement of a 10° lordotic cage, 3) ALL release and placement of a 20° lordotic cage, and 4) ALL release and placement of a 30° lordotic cage. All four cages were implanted sequentially at each interbody level between L-1 and L-5. Before and after each intervention, segmental lumbar lordosis was measured in all specimens at each interbody level between L-1 and L-5 using the Cobb method on lateral radiography.


The mean baseline segmental lordotic angles at L1–2, L2–3, L3–4, and L4–5 were –3.8°, 3.8°, 7.8°, and 22.6°, respectively. The mean lumbar lordosis was 29.4°. Compared with baseline, the mean postimplantation increase in segmental lordosis in all levels combined was 0.9° in Intervention 1 (10° cage without ALL release); 4.1° in Intervention 2 (ALL release with 10° cage); 9.5° in Intervention 3 (ALL release with 20° cage); and 11.6° in Intervention 4 (ALL release with 30° cage). Foraminal height in the same sequence of conditions increased by 6.3%, 4.6%, 8.8% and 10.4%, respectively, while central disc height increased by 16.1%, 22.3%, 52.0% and 66.7%, respectively. Following ALL release and placement of lordotic cages at all 4 lumbar levels, the average global lumbar lordosis increase from preoperative lordosis was 3.2° using 10° cages, 12.0° using 20° cages, and 20.3° using 30° cages. Global lumbar lordosis with the cages at 4 levels exhibited a negative correlation with preoperative global lordosis (10°, R = −0.756; 20°, −0.730; and 30°, R = −0.437).


Combined ALL release and placement of increasingly lordotic lateral interbody cages leads to progressive gains in segmental lordosis in the lumbar spine. Mean global lumbar lordosis similarly increased with increasingly lordotic cages, although the effect with a single cage could not be evaluated. Greater global lordosis was achieved with smaller preoperative lordosis. The mean maximum increase in segmental lordosis of 11.6° followed ALL release and placement of the 30° cage.

Abbreviations used in this paper:ALL = anterior longitudinal ligament; PSO = pedicle subtraction osteotomy; SPO = Smith-Petersen osteotomy.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Juan S. Uribe, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, Florida 33606. email: JuanSUribe@gmail.com.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online August 31, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.8.SPINE111121.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.



  • View in gallery

    Illustration of the CoRoent XL-HL (extra large, hyperlordotic) implant with integrated screw fixation. It is available in either 20° or 30° lordotic configurations.

  • View in gallery

    Lateral fluoroscopic images showing test condition progression from preimplantation (A), 10° lordotic cage without ALL release (B), 10° lordotic cage with ALL release (C), 20° lordotic cage with ALL release (D), and 30° lordotic cage with ALL release (E).

  • View in gallery

    Lateral fluoroscopic images demonstrating the procedures used for evaluating radiographic segmental lordosis (upper) and for evaluating radiographic global lumbar lordosis (lower).

  • View in gallery

    Lateral fluoroscopic images showing the procedures used for evaluating foraminal height changes (upper) and posterior disc height changes (lower). Note in both images that measurements are relative to each other, rather than representing absolute values. Thus, the measurements shown are not to scale.

  • View in gallery

    Charts revealing negative correlations between initial lumbar lordosis and change in lordosis for 10° (A), 20° (B), and 30° (C) lordotic cages with ALL release.


  • 1

    Acosta FLLiu JSlimack NMoller DFessler RKoski T: Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:92962011

  • 2

    Aebi M: The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:9259482005

  • 3

    Ahn UMAhn NUBuchowski JMKebaish KMLee JHSong ES: Functional outcome and radiographic correction after spinal osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:130313112002

  • 4

    Akbarnia BAMundis GMoazzaz PKabirian NBagheri REastlack R: Can less invasive LIFTAR (lateral interbody fusion with transpsoas ALL release) replace 3-column osteotomy for correction of adult focal sagittal deformity?. Society of Lateral Access Surgery (SOLAS) Annual Meeting San Diego, CASOLAS2011. 5(Abstract)

  • 5

    Anand NBaron EMThaiyananthan GKhalsa KGoldstein TB: Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:4594672008

  • 6

    Anand NRosemann RKhalsa BBaron EM: Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:3E62010

  • 7

    Baldus CRBridwell KHLenke LGOkubadejo GO: Can we safely reduce blood loss during lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy procedures using tranexamic acid or aprotinin? A comparative study with controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2352392010

  • 8

    Boachie-Adjei ODendrinos GKOgilvie JWBradford DS: Management of adult spinal deformity with combined anterior-posterior arthrodesis and Luque-Galveston instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 4:1311411991

  • 9

    Booth KCBridwell KHLenke LGBaldus CRBlanke KM: Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:171217201999

  • 10

    Bridwell KH: Causes of sagittal spinal imbalance and assessment of the extent of needed correction. Instr Course Lect 55:5675752006

  • 11

    Bridwell KH: Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:19 SupplS171S1782006

  • 12

    Bridwell KHLenke LGLewis SJ: Treatment of spinal stenosis and fixed sagittal imbalance. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:35442001

  • 13

    Bridwell KHLewis SJEdwards CLenke LGIffrig TMBerra A: Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:209321012003

  • 14

    Bridwell KHLewis SJLenke LGBaldus CBlanke K: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:4544632003

  • 15

    Bridwell KHLewis SJRinella ALenke LGBaldus CBlanke K: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:Suppl 144502004

  • 16

    Buchowski JMBridwell KHLenke LGKuhns CALehman RA JrKim YJ: Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:224522522007

  • 17

    Dakwar ECardona RFSmith DAUribe JS: Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 3:1e81997

  • 18

    Dobbs MBLenke LGKim YJLuhmann SJBridwell KH: Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:238623912006

  • 19

    Dubousset J: Reflections of an orthopaedic surgeon on patient care and research into the condition of scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31:1 SupplS1S82011

  • 20

    Farcy JPSchwab FJ: Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:245224571997

  • 21

    Glassman SDBridwell KDimar JRHorton WBerven SSchwab F: The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:202420292005

  • 22

    Grubb SALipscomb HJ: Diagnostic findings in painful adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:5185271992

  • 23

    Isaacs REHyde JGoodrich JARodgers WBPhillips FM: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 SupplS322S3302010

  • 24

    Law WA: Osteotomy of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 66:70761969

  • 25

    Le TVUribe JSThe minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Chung KJ: Spine Surgery Rijeka CroatiaInTech2012. 7996

  • 26

    Lee MJWiater BBransford RJBellabarba CChapman JR: Lordosis restoration after Smith-Petersen osteotomies and interbody strut placement: a radiographic study in cadavers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1487E14912010

  • 27

    Lenke LG: Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:15 SupplS36S432003

  • 28

    Lenke LGNewton POMarks MCBlanke KMSides BKim YJ: Prospective pulmonary function comparison of open versus endoscopic anterior fusion combined with posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:205520602004

  • 29

    Liu LSong YLi T: [Releasing anterior part of spine under video-assisted thoracoscope for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 8:8258282007. (Chinese)

  • 30

    Luhmann SJLenke LGKim YJBridwell KHSchootman M: Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:206120672005

  • 31

    Mummaneni PVDhall SSOndra SLMummaneni VPBerven S: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery 63:3 Suppl1711762008

  • 32

    Mundis GMAkbarnia BAPhillips FM: Adult deformity correction through minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 SupplS312S3212010

  • 33

    Ozgur BMAgarwal VNail EPimenta L: Two-year clinical and radiographic success of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar conditions. SAS J 4:41462010

  • 34

    Ozgur BMAryan HEPimenta LTaylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:4354432006

  • 35

    Schwab FLafage VPatel AFarcy JP: Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:182818332009

  • 36

    Schwab FJSmith VABiserni MGamez LFarcy JPPagala M: Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:3873922002

  • 37

    Shamji MFIsaacs RE: Anterior-only approaches to scoliosis. Neurosurgery 63:3 Suppl1391482008

  • 38

    Smith JSSansur CADonaldson WF IIIPerra JHMudiyam RChoma TJ: Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:9589642011

  • 39

    Swank SM: The management of scoliosis in the adult. Orthop Clin North Am 10:8919041979

  • 40

    Tormenti MJMaserati MBBonfield CMOkonkwo DOKanter AS: Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 3:2e71997

  • 41

    Wang MYBerven SH: Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery 60:2 Suppl 1ONS140ONS1462007

  • 42

    Wang MYMummaneni PV: Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 3:1e91997

  • 43

    Yeon HBWeinberg JArlet VOuelett JAWood KB: Anterior lumbar instrumentation improves correction of severe lumbar Lenke C curves in double major idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 16:137913852007

  • 44

    Youssef JAMcAfee PCPatty CARaley EDeBauche SShucosky E: Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 SupplS302S3112010


Cited By



All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 198 198 15
Full Text Views 164 164 6
PDF Downloads 156 156 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0


Google Scholar