Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion

A review

Benjamin J. Shin B.S., Andrew R. James M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S., Innocent U. Njoku B.S., and Roger Härtl M.D.
View More View Less
  • Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

In this paper the authors' goal was to compare the accuracy of computer-navigated pedicle screw insertion with nonnavigated techniques in the published literature.

Methods

The authors performed a systematic literature review using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Database (PubMed/MEDLINE) using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms “Neuronavigation,” “Therapy, computer assisted,” and “Stereotaxic techniques,” and the text word “pedicle.” Included in the meta-analysis were randomized control trials or patient cohort series, all of which compared computer-navigated spine surgery (CNSS) and nonassisted pedicle screw insertions. The primary end point was pedicle perforation, while the secondary end points were operative time, blood loss, and complications.

Results

Twenty studies were included for analysis; of which there were 18 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2011. Foreign-language papers were translated. The total number of screws included was 8539 (4814 navigated and 3725 nonnavigated). The most common indications for surgery were degenerative disease, spinal deformity, myelopathy, tumor, and trauma. Navigational methods were primarily based on CT imaging. All regions of the spine were represented. The relative risk for pedicle screw perforation was determined to be 0.39 (p < 0.001), favoring navigation. The overall pedicle screw perforation risk for navigation was 6%, while the overall pedicle screw perforation risk was 15% for conventional insertion. No related neurological complications were reported with navigated insertion (4814 screws total); there were 3 neurological complications in the nonnavigated group (3725 screws total). Furthermore, the meta-analysis did not reveal a significant difference in total operative time and estimated blood loss when comparing the 2 modalities.

Conclusions

There is a significantly lower risk of pedicle perforation for navigated screw insertion compared with nonnavigated insertion for all spinal regions.

Abbreviations used in this paper:CAS = computer-assisted surgery; CNSS = computer-navigated spine surgery; EBL = estimated blood loss; MeSH = Medical Subject Headings; MIS = minimally invasive surgery; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Roger Härtl, M.D., Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, New York 10065. email: roger@hartlmd.net.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online June 22, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.5.SPINE11399.

  • 1

    Alberti O, , Dorward NL, , Kitchen ND, & Thomas DG: Neuronavigation—impact on operating time. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 68:4448, 1997

  • 2

    Amiot LP, , Lang K, , Putzier M, , Zippel H, & Labelle H: Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:606614, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Arand M, , Hartwig E, , Hebold D, , Kinzl L, & Gebhard F: [Precision analysis of navigation-assisted implanted thoracic and lumbar pedicled screws. A prospective clinical study.]. Unfallchirurg 104:10761081, 2001. (Ger)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Chen HJ: Clinical experiences in neuronavigation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 76:145147, 2001

  • 5

    Fraser J, , Gebhard H, , Irie D, , Parikh K, & Härtl R: Iso-C/3-dimensional neuronavigation versus conventional fluoroscopy for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:184190, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Gebhard F, , Weidner A, , Liener UC, , Stöckle U, & Arand M: Navigation at the spine. Injury 35:Suppl 1 S-A35S-A-45, 2004

  • 7

    Gröbe A, , Weber C, , Schmelzle R, , Heiland M, , Klatt J, & Pohlenz P: The use of navigation (BrainLAB Vector vision(2)) and intraoperative 3D imaging system (Siemens Arcadis Orbic 3D) in the treatment of gunshot wounds of the maxillofacial region. Oral Maxillofac Surg 13:153158, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Han W, , Gao ZL, , Wang JC, , Li YP, , Peng X, & Rui J, : Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques. Orthopedics 33:DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100625-14 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hanley JA, & Thériault G: Simpson's paradox in meta-analysis. Epidemiology 11:613614, 2000

  • 10

    Härtl R, , Lham K, , Wang J, , Korge A, & Kandziora F: The AOSpine ANEG (Access and Navigation Expert Group) survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery. Presented at the Global Spine Congress 2011 Barcelona, Spain March 23–26 2011. (Abstract) (http://www.neuro.opole.pl/gsc.pdf) [Accessed May 16, 2012]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hernán MA, , Clayton D, & Keiding N: The Simpson's paradox unraveled. Int J Epidemiol 40:780785, 2011

  • 12

    Holly LT, & Foley KT: Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:15 Suppl S54S61, 2003

  • 13

    Hozo SP, , Djulbegovic B, & Hozo I: Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Ishikawa Y, , Kanemura T, , Yoshida G, , Ito Z, , Muramoto A, & Ohno S: Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:606611, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Ito H, , Neo M, , Yoshida M, , Fujibayashi S, , Yoshitomi H, & Nakamura T: Efficacy of computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion for cervical instability in RA patients. Rheumatol Int 27:567574, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Jolesz FA: Intraoperative imaging in neurosurgery: where will the future take us?. Acta Neurochir Suppl 109:2125, 2011

  • 17

    Kalfas IH, , Kormos DW, , Murphy MA, , McKenzie RL, , Barnett GH, & Bell GR, : Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg 83:641647, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kosmopoulos V, & Schizas C: Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E111E120, 2007

  • 19

    Kotani Y, , Abumi K, , Ito M, & Minami A: Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg 99:3 Suppl 257263, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kotani Y, , Abumi K, , Ito M, , Takahata M, , Sudo H, & Ohshima S, : Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:15431550, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Laine T, , Lund T, , Ylikoski M, , Lohikoski J, & Schlenzka D: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235240, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Lasio G, , Ferroli P, , Felisati G, & Broggi G: Image-guided endoscopic transnasal removal of recurrent pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 51:132137, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Lee GY, , Massicotte EM, & Rampersaud YR: Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the “open” lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:2532, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Liu YJ, , Tian W, , Liu B, , Li Q, , Hu L, & Li ZY, : [Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws implantation in the cervical spine compared with X-ray fluoroscopy technique.]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 43:13281330, 2005. (Chinese)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Merloz P, , Troccaz J, , Vouaillat H, , Vasile C, , Tonetti J, & Eid A, : Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:813820, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Nakashima H, , Sato K, , Ando T, , Inoh H, & Nakamura H: Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:468472, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Parker SL, , McGirt MJ, , Farber SH, , Amin AG, , Rick AM, & Suk I, : Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery 68:170178, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Rajasekaran S, , Vidyadhara S, , Ramesh P, & Shetty AP: Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E56E64, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Richter M, , Cakir B, & Schmidt R: Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:22802287, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Sakai Y, , Matsuyama Y, , Nakamura H, , Katayama Y, , Imagama S, & Ito Z, : Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:181186, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Schnake KJ, , König B, , Berth U, , Schroeder RJ, , Kandziora F, & Stöckle U, : [Accuracy of CT-based navitation of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine compared with conventional technique.]. Unfallchirurg 107:104112, 2004. (Ger)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Schulze CJ, , Munzinger E, & Weber U: Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:22152211, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Seller K, , Wild A, , Urselmann L, & Krauspe R: [Prospective screw misplacement analysis after conventional and navigated pedicle screw implantation.]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 50:287292, 2005. (Ger)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Silbermann J, , Riese F, , Allam Y, , Reichert T, , Koeppert H, & Gutberlet M: Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between freehand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 20:875881, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Tian NF, & Xu HZ: Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33:895903, 2009

  • 36

    Tian W, , Liu YJ, , Liu B, , Li Q, , Hu L, & Li ZY, : [Clinical contrast of cervical pedicle screw fixation assisted by C-arm fluoroscopy or 3D navigation system.]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 44:13991402, 2006. (Chinese)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Tjardes T, , Shafizadeh S, , Rixen D, , Paffrath T, , Bouillon B, & Steinhausen ES, : Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions. Eur Spine J 19:2545, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Tonn JC, , Schichor C, , Schnell O, , Zausinger S, , Uhl E, & Morhard D, : Intraoperative computed tomography. Acta Neurochir Suppl 109:163167, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Tormenti MJ, , Kostov DB, , Gardner PA, , Kanter AS, , Spiro RM, & Okonkwo DO: Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus 28:3 E11, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Wiesner L, , Kothe R, , Schulitz KP, & Rüther W: Clinical evaluation and computed tomography scan analysis of screw tracts after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:615621, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Wirtz CR, , Albert FK, , Schwaderer M, , Heuer C, , Staubert A, & Tronnier VM, : The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery. Neurol Res 22:354360, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Youkilis AS, , Quint DJ, , McGillicuddy JE, & Papadopoulos SM: Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 48:771779, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Yu X, , Xu L, & Bi LY: [Spinal navigation with intra-operative 3D-imaging modality in lumbar pedicle screw fixation.]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 88:19051908, 2008. (Chinese)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1028 437 56
Full Text Views 369 96 10
PDF Downloads 330 81 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0